Use of adult anthropometric tables to estimate children body segment inertial parameters

ABSTRACT There is a lack of knowledge in the literature concerning Body Segment Inertial Parameters (BSIP) for children aged 4 to 15 years. Nevertheless, these data are fundamental for studying the dynamics of the healthy and pathological musculoskeletal system. One common method for obtaining BSIP...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabrina Otmani, Guilhem Michon, Bruno Watier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:International Biomechanics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23335432.2023.2268686
_version_ 1797245253015568384
author Sabrina Otmani
Guilhem Michon
Bruno Watier
author_facet Sabrina Otmani
Guilhem Michon
Bruno Watier
author_sort Sabrina Otmani
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT There is a lack of knowledge in the literature concerning Body Segment Inertial Parameters (BSIP) for children aged 4 to 15 years. Nevertheless, these data are fundamental for studying the dynamics of the healthy and pathological musculoskeletal system. One common method for obtaining BSIP is to use regression equations derived from anthropometric tables. However, the majority of these equations are based on adult data. In this study, we compared certain BSIP (segment mass, center of mass position, and transverse moment of inertia) derived from adult anthropometric tables with the corresponding BSIP extracted from a pediatric anthropometric table. The goal of this study was to determine the accuracy of using adult anthropometric tables to calculate pediatric BSIP. For this comparison, we assessed the proximity of several adult anthropometric tables to a pediatric anthropometric table by Jensen (1986) for each BSIP. Our results revealed differences between the BSIP obtained using adult tables and the BSIP obtained with the pediatric table used as a reference. When considering all the tables, the mean relative difference was 12% for segment mass, 12% for center of mass position, and 25% for transverse moment of inertia. Notably, the greatest relative differences were observed for the head, hand, and foot segments. Additionally, the relative difference in female data was higher compared to males. This result could be attributed to the predominant use of male subjects in the adult tables considered in this study. Finally, the adult anthropometric tables by Dumas and Wojtsuch (2018) and De Leva (1996) provided results that were closer in comparison to Jensen (1986).
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:20:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-302b7dd1c7f94f938cf05dd0efae96af
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2333-5432
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:23:58Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Biomechanics
spelling doaj.art-302b7dd1c7f94f938cf05dd0efae96af2024-03-25T16:36:07ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Biomechanics2333-54322023-12-01101182810.1080/23335432.2023.2268686Use of adult anthropometric tables to estimate children body segment inertial parametersSabrina Otmani0Guilhem Michon1Bruno Watier2LAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS UPS, Toulouse, FranceUniversité de Toulouse, CNRS, ICA, ISAE-SUPAERO, Toulouse, FranceLAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS UPS, Toulouse, FranceABSTRACT There is a lack of knowledge in the literature concerning Body Segment Inertial Parameters (BSIP) for children aged 4 to 15 years. Nevertheless, these data are fundamental for studying the dynamics of the healthy and pathological musculoskeletal system. One common method for obtaining BSIP is to use regression equations derived from anthropometric tables. However, the majority of these equations are based on adult data. In this study, we compared certain BSIP (segment mass, center of mass position, and transverse moment of inertia) derived from adult anthropometric tables with the corresponding BSIP extracted from a pediatric anthropometric table. The goal of this study was to determine the accuracy of using adult anthropometric tables to calculate pediatric BSIP. For this comparison, we assessed the proximity of several adult anthropometric tables to a pediatric anthropometric table by Jensen (1986) for each BSIP. Our results revealed differences between the BSIP obtained using adult tables and the BSIP obtained with the pediatric table used as a reference. When considering all the tables, the mean relative difference was 12% for segment mass, 12% for center of mass position, and 25% for transverse moment of inertia. Notably, the greatest relative differences were observed for the head, hand, and foot segments. Additionally, the relative difference in female data was higher compared to males. This result could be attributed to the predominant use of male subjects in the adult tables considered in this study. Finally, the adult anthropometric tables by Dumas and Wojtsuch (2018) and De Leva (1996) provided results that were closer in comparison to Jensen (1986).https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23335432.2023.2268686Segment masscenter of massmoment of inertiaregression equations
spellingShingle Sabrina Otmani
Guilhem Michon
Bruno Watier
Use of adult anthropometric tables to estimate children body segment inertial parameters
International Biomechanics
Segment mass
center of mass
moment of inertia
regression equations
title Use of adult anthropometric tables to estimate children body segment inertial parameters
title_full Use of adult anthropometric tables to estimate children body segment inertial parameters
title_fullStr Use of adult anthropometric tables to estimate children body segment inertial parameters
title_full_unstemmed Use of adult anthropometric tables to estimate children body segment inertial parameters
title_short Use of adult anthropometric tables to estimate children body segment inertial parameters
title_sort use of adult anthropometric tables to estimate children body segment inertial parameters
topic Segment mass
center of mass
moment of inertia
regression equations
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23335432.2023.2268686
work_keys_str_mv AT sabrinaotmani useofadultanthropometrictablestoestimatechildrenbodysegmentinertialparameters
AT guilhemmichon useofadultanthropometrictablestoestimatechildrenbodysegmentinertialparameters
AT brunowatier useofadultanthropometrictablestoestimatechildrenbodysegmentinertialparameters