Disability and the household context: Findings for the United States from the public Use Microdata Sample of the American Community Survey

IntroductionBased on questions about impairments and activity limitations, the American Community Survey shows that roughly 13% of the U.S. population is experiencing disability. As most people live in households with other persons, this study explores disability at the household level. Considering...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christiane von Reichert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2022.875966/full
_version_ 1797964659897139200
author Christiane von Reichert
Christiane von Reichert
author_facet Christiane von Reichert
Christiane von Reichert
author_sort Christiane von Reichert
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionBased on questions about impairments and activity limitations, the American Community Survey shows that roughly 13% of the U.S. population is experiencing disability. As most people live in households with other persons, this study explores disability at the household level. Considering the literature on household decision-making, solidarity, and capabilities in disability, this analysis of the household context of disability takes into account residential settings, household composition, and urban–rural differences.MethodThe 2015–2019 ACS Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), which shows persons with disability (PwD) and persons without disability (PwoD), also indicates household membership, used here to separately identify PwoD as those living in households with persons with disability (PwoD_HHwD) and those in households without any household member with disability (PwoD_HHwoD). Relationship variables reveal the composition of households with and without disabilities. An adaption of Beale's rural–urban continuum code for counties is used to approximate rural–urban differences with ACS PUMS data.ResultsSolo living is two times as common among persons with disability than among persons without disability, and higher in rural than urban areas. In addition to 43 million PwD, there are another 42 million PwoD_HHwD. Two times as many persons are impacted by disability, either of their own or that of a household member, than shown by an analysis of individual-level disability. For family households, differences in the composition of households with and without disabilities are considerable with much greater complexities in the makeup of families with disability. The presence of multiple generations stands out. Adult sons or daughters without disability play an important role. Modest urban–rural differences exist in the composition of family households with disability, with a greater presence of multigenerational households in large cities.DiscussionThis research reveals the much wider scope of household-level disability than indicated by disability of individuals alone. The greater complexity and multigenerational makeup of households with disability imply intergenerational solidarity, reciprocity, and resource sharing. Household members without disability may add to the capabilities of persons with disabilities. For the sizeable share of PwD living solo, there is concern about their needs being met.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T01:48:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3036d08bcb34482cb885071ad0fa9544
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-6861
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T01:48:32Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
spelling doaj.art-3036d08bcb34482cb885071ad0fa95442023-01-03T07:27:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences2673-68612022-08-01310.3389/fresc.2022.875966875966Disability and the household context: Findings for the United States from the public Use Microdata Sample of the American Community SurveyChristiane von Reichert0Christiane von Reichert1Department of Geography, Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United StatesRTC: Rural at the Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United StatesIntroductionBased on questions about impairments and activity limitations, the American Community Survey shows that roughly 13% of the U.S. population is experiencing disability. As most people live in households with other persons, this study explores disability at the household level. Considering the literature on household decision-making, solidarity, and capabilities in disability, this analysis of the household context of disability takes into account residential settings, household composition, and urban–rural differences.MethodThe 2015–2019 ACS Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), which shows persons with disability (PwD) and persons without disability (PwoD), also indicates household membership, used here to separately identify PwoD as those living in households with persons with disability (PwoD_HHwD) and those in households without any household member with disability (PwoD_HHwoD). Relationship variables reveal the composition of households with and without disabilities. An adaption of Beale's rural–urban continuum code for counties is used to approximate rural–urban differences with ACS PUMS data.ResultsSolo living is two times as common among persons with disability than among persons without disability, and higher in rural than urban areas. In addition to 43 million PwD, there are another 42 million PwoD_HHwD. Two times as many persons are impacted by disability, either of their own or that of a household member, than shown by an analysis of individual-level disability. For family households, differences in the composition of households with and without disabilities are considerable with much greater complexities in the makeup of families with disability. The presence of multiple generations stands out. Adult sons or daughters without disability play an important role. Modest urban–rural differences exist in the composition of family households with disability, with a greater presence of multigenerational households in large cities.DiscussionThis research reveals the much wider scope of household-level disability than indicated by disability of individuals alone. The greater complexity and multigenerational makeup of households with disability imply intergenerational solidarity, reciprocity, and resource sharing. Household members without disability may add to the capabilities of persons with disabilities. For the sizeable share of PwD living solo, there is concern about their needs being met.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2022.875966/fulldisabilitypersons without disability in households with disabilitysingle-person householdsfamily solidaritycapability approachurban-rural
spellingShingle Christiane von Reichert
Christiane von Reichert
Disability and the household context: Findings for the United States from the public Use Microdata Sample of the American Community Survey
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
disability
persons without disability in households with disability
single-person households
family solidarity
capability approach
urban-rural
title Disability and the household context: Findings for the United States from the public Use Microdata Sample of the American Community Survey
title_full Disability and the household context: Findings for the United States from the public Use Microdata Sample of the American Community Survey
title_fullStr Disability and the household context: Findings for the United States from the public Use Microdata Sample of the American Community Survey
title_full_unstemmed Disability and the household context: Findings for the United States from the public Use Microdata Sample of the American Community Survey
title_short Disability and the household context: Findings for the United States from the public Use Microdata Sample of the American Community Survey
title_sort disability and the household context findings for the united states from the public use microdata sample of the american community survey
topic disability
persons without disability in households with disability
single-person households
family solidarity
capability approach
urban-rural
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2022.875966/full
work_keys_str_mv AT christianevonreichert disabilityandthehouseholdcontextfindingsfortheunitedstatesfromthepublicusemicrodatasampleoftheamericancommunitysurvey
AT christianevonreichert disabilityandthehouseholdcontextfindingsfortheunitedstatesfromthepublicusemicrodatasampleoftheamericancommunitysurvey