An Analysis of Administrative Corruption (Administrative Organizations of Yazd City)

Introduction   Administrative corruption is a complicated and multi-faceted phenomenon that has many causes and ramifications, which manifest themselves in different forms in various countries and appear to be endemic of all social systems where authority is delegated. Although there might be differ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mansour Haghighatian, Somayeh Karimizadeh, Javad Nazari
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: University of Isfahan 2013-02-01
Series:جامعه شناسی کاربردی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/jas/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-141&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1819036994063302656
author Mansour Haghighatian
Somayeh Karimizadeh
Javad Nazari
author_facet Mansour Haghighatian
Somayeh Karimizadeh
Javad Nazari
author_sort Mansour Haghighatian
collection DOAJ
description Introduction   Administrative corruption is a complicated and multi-faceted phenomenon that has many causes and ramifications, which manifest themselves in different forms in various countries and appear to be endemic of all social systems where authority is delegated. Although there might be different definitions of and approaches towards administrative corruption, the definition that has been put forward by the World Bank and Transparency International appears to be more general and comprehensive. It defines corruption as the abuse of public power, office, or resources by public or elected governmental officials for personal gain, e.g. by extortion, soliciting or offering bribes. Recent research findings indicate that organizational commitment and work satisfaction on the part of employees could be an effective antidote to administrative corruption. On the other hand, employee sense of equity and fairness also has been shown to be effective in enhancing organizational commitment. Last but not least, employee financial needs could play a significant part in their vulnerability to corruption. Therefore, the main aim of this paper is as follows: by utilizing the ideas of Selznick on organizational commitment, Merton's views on work satisfaction, Taylor's and Schwartz's ideas on financial needs, and Barnard's views on managerial capabilities, the relationships of these variables on administrative corruption were studied. The other purpose of the paper is to examine the effects of some other related variables like age, sex, level of education, job seniority, and marital status on administrative corruption.     Material and Methods   The research method was quantitative, data collection technique was survey, and the tool of data collection was questionnaire. The research population of the study consisted of all 44116 employees of public organizations of the city of Yazd. Using a stratified sampling technique, 16 administrative organizations were selected. To optimize the generalizability of the findings, p (the relevant characteristic in the population, which in this study relates to the possibility of corruption) was considered to be 0.50. Then, with the aid of systematic random sampling, 400 employees were selected as research sample. Based on relevant theoretical orientations and the results of empirical research, the following variables were regarded as independent variable: (1) Employee organizational commitment, which refers to the extent that employees believe in organizational goals and values, and the extent to which they are willing to stay with the organization and help it in realizing those goals. Seven Likert-type questions were used to measure this variable. Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability was 0.89.   (2) Employee work satisfaction, which refers to employees' sense of job security and contentedness with the organization, with his/her coworkers, and how much he/she felt that there are opportunities for progress in his/her job and the organization. Five Likert-type questions were used to measure this variable. Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability was 0.84.   (3) Managerial capabilities, which refers to the extent of management's power and abilities to run the organization in an optimum level as regards to coordination, planning, leading, and controlling employee activity towards the attainment of organizational goals. Six Likert-type questions were used to measure this variable. Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability was 0.85.   (4) Employee financial status that referred to employee salary and whether they felt that their salary and fringe benefits were fair and suitable to have a relatively comfortable life. Nine Likert-type questions were used to measure this variable. Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability was 0.88.   The dependent variable was administrative corruption and it referred to situations where organizational officials and employees felt that the use of their official status for personal gain was possible and justifiable. For example, respondents were asked to rate their following question: "since officials should be able to use their time and expertise in much needed places, they should not have to wait in queues like everyone else to get their usual chores done". Nine Likert-type questions were used to measure this variable. Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability was 0.90.   Analysis of variance, the T test, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to test the relationships among variables, and to test the theoretical model, regression analysis and the Lisrel software were utilized.     Discussion of Results and Conclusions   Research findings showed that the average amount of corruption 33.78 was higher than the expected average of 27. The amount of corruption differed by educational level, that is, as educational level increased the average amount of corruption decreased. It could be said that since jobs requiring higher levels of education also pay higher levels of wages and salaries, therefore their holders may not be as vulnerable to corruption as their counterparts with lower educational levels. The average amount of corruption for singles was 36.89 and that of married individuals was 33.19, therefore it could be said that marital status and corruption are related. Although it could be argued that since married people have more life obligations and therefore have higher expenses, thus being more vulnerable to financial corruptions, but the results showed that their average corruption levels are actually lower than singles. The higher levels of corruption among singles could be due to the fact that singles are less experienced and/or may have lower salaries, since in all probabilities; they were recently hired and are at lower levels of job rankings. It could also be argued that since singles have many more needs such as houses, automobiles, etc. they may be more vulnerable to corruption. No association was found between corruption and years of employment. This is actually interesting, since one may suspect that experience and tenure on the job could positively or negatively affect vulnerability to corruption and it is something that needs further investigation. The average amount of corruption for men was 33.47 and that of women was 34.22, and the results of the t-test showed that this difference was not statistically significant. This may seem odd because women's participation in out-of-home jobs in Iran is relatively recent and is not very significant- as far as numbers are concerned- and other studies have not found significant amounts of corruption among them. Further research in this area could be illuminating. The results of regression analysis indicated that organizational commitment (r= -0.61) and financial needs (r= 0.45) were the most important factors affecting corruption. The direction of these relationships is of importance. As one's commitment to the organization increases, his/her chances of committing corruption decreases. This means that organizational authorities should pay enormous attention to the ways and mechanisms that enhance employee commitment. Also, the direct association between financial needs and corruption also needs to be taken seriously, because it shows that as financial needs go up, so does the chances of committing corruption. There was a reverse association between job satisfaction and corruption (r= -0.35). This, like organizational commitment, seems reasonable and needs to be taken very seriously. Organizational authorities should be very keen to identify the factors that may lead to job dissatisfaction among employees and find ways to increase their job satisfaction. Managerial capabilities had the least amount of impact (r= 0.10). This is somewhat strange, since it appears that managerial capabilities should play a significant role in this area and other studies have found that managerial styles and capabilities do have an effect. Further research in this area can of course be very important. The coefficient of determination was 0.57 which, although is an acceptable level of goodness of fit, nevertheless, shows that all four independent variables could explain only about 57 percent of the variability of the dependent variable.       References   Abedi-jafari, Hasan; Hoseini-hashemnejad, Davood; Habibi, Leila. (2010). “A Comparison of the views and attitudes of male and female employees regarding administrative corruption”. Applied Research , The college of Management, University of Tehran, pp. 101-117   Baker, Terese, L. (2009). How Social Research is Done. Translated by Hooshang Naeni, Tehran: Nashre Ney   Burrell, Gibson, and Gareth Morgan.(1979). Sociological paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann publications.   Dadkhodae, Leila. (2011). “A Review of the performance of Transparency International regarding the measurement of Corruption”. Transcendental Law, no. 8-9, pp. 73-87   Danae-fard, Hasan. (2005). “Will Information Technology Decrease Administrative Corruption?” The Humanities Instructor, no. 39, pp. 101-118   Donya-e-Eqtesad. (2008). How Does State Economy affect Economic and administrative corruption?” an interview with Safdar Hoseini, Saeed Leylaz, and Dr. Ziba-kalam. No. 1576, pp. 8.   Faripoor, Faramarz. (1999). Corruption in Iran. Tehran: Enteshar publications   Iman, Mohammad Taghi; Esna-ashari, Farideh. (2004). “Studying the factors that affect Organizational Alienation in Iran (the organizations of Shiraz)”. The Research Journal of the University of Isfahan, vol. 17, no.2, pp. 31-58   Khezri, Mohammad. (2004). “administrative corruption”. Strategic studies Quarterly, no. 29, pp. 30-42   Kian Manesh, Camran. (2007). “A Reflection on the Issue of administrative corruption”. Tehran: Ertebatat va Fanavri   Lederman, Daniel& Loayza, Norman, and Soares, Rodrigo Reis .2001. Accountability and Corruption : Political Institutions Matter, social science research network.   Ritzer, George.(2011). Sociological Theory. Eighth edition. New York: mc graw Hill   Rabie, Ali. (2004). Long Live Corruption: Political sociology of Corruption in the Third World Governments. The Ministry of Islamic culture and Guidance   Rafipoor, Faramarz. (1997). Modernization and Conflict: An attempt toward the analysis of the Islamic Revolution and Social Problems o Iran. Tehran: shahid Beheshti University   Robbins, Stephen p. (1991). Organizational Behavior: concepts Controversies, and Applications. Fourth edition, new jersey: prentice-Hall, Inc   Sabatini , Fabio. (2005).”Dose social capital Improve Labor productivity in small and Medium Enterprises/” from : www.socialcapitalgetewat.org (sabatin:2005a)   Scott, Richard W.(1992). Organization: rational, natural, and open systems, third edition. New Jersey: prentice-Hall   .Shanon, A. R. (2003). The relationship between organized recreational programs and job satisfaction,” The University Connecticut   Singer, Marc J. (1999). Human Resources Management. Translated by Farideh Ale-agha. Tehran: the Center for Public administration Training   Steers, R.M. (1987). An introduction to organizational behavior". 3 rd ed. scot forsmand and company .   Tresiman, Daniel. 2000. The causes of corruption: a cross-national study, Journal of Public Economics, 76 pp 399 – 457.   www.Ostan yazd.ir   
first_indexed 2024-12-21T08:14:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3038f0fb737f4b38842fe05661d8f23f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-5745
2322-343X
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-21T08:14:21Z
publishDate 2013-02-01
publisher University of Isfahan
record_format Article
series جامعه شناسی کاربردی
spelling doaj.art-3038f0fb737f4b38842fe05661d8f23f2022-12-21T19:10:35ZfasUniversity of Isfahanجامعه شناسی کاربردی2008-57452322-343X2013-02-01234125142An Analysis of Administrative Corruption (Administrative Organizations of Yazd City)Mansour Haghighatian0Somayeh Karimizadeh1Javad Nazari2 Islamic Azad University- Dehaghan Branch Islamic Azad Universtiy- Dehaghan Branch Islamic Azad University- Dehaghan Branch Introduction   Administrative corruption is a complicated and multi-faceted phenomenon that has many causes and ramifications, which manifest themselves in different forms in various countries and appear to be endemic of all social systems where authority is delegated. Although there might be different definitions of and approaches towards administrative corruption, the definition that has been put forward by the World Bank and Transparency International appears to be more general and comprehensive. It defines corruption as the abuse of public power, office, or resources by public or elected governmental officials for personal gain, e.g. by extortion, soliciting or offering bribes. Recent research findings indicate that organizational commitment and work satisfaction on the part of employees could be an effective antidote to administrative corruption. On the other hand, employee sense of equity and fairness also has been shown to be effective in enhancing organizational commitment. Last but not least, employee financial needs could play a significant part in their vulnerability to corruption. Therefore, the main aim of this paper is as follows: by utilizing the ideas of Selznick on organizational commitment, Merton's views on work satisfaction, Taylor's and Schwartz's ideas on financial needs, and Barnard's views on managerial capabilities, the relationships of these variables on administrative corruption were studied. The other purpose of the paper is to examine the effects of some other related variables like age, sex, level of education, job seniority, and marital status on administrative corruption.     Material and Methods   The research method was quantitative, data collection technique was survey, and the tool of data collection was questionnaire. The research population of the study consisted of all 44116 employees of public organizations of the city of Yazd. Using a stratified sampling technique, 16 administrative organizations were selected. To optimize the generalizability of the findings, p (the relevant characteristic in the population, which in this study relates to the possibility of corruption) was considered to be 0.50. Then, with the aid of systematic random sampling, 400 employees were selected as research sample. Based on relevant theoretical orientations and the results of empirical research, the following variables were regarded as independent variable: (1) Employee organizational commitment, which refers to the extent that employees believe in organizational goals and values, and the extent to which they are willing to stay with the organization and help it in realizing those goals. Seven Likert-type questions were used to measure this variable. Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability was 0.89.   (2) Employee work satisfaction, which refers to employees' sense of job security and contentedness with the organization, with his/her coworkers, and how much he/she felt that there are opportunities for progress in his/her job and the organization. Five Likert-type questions were used to measure this variable. Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability was 0.84.   (3) Managerial capabilities, which refers to the extent of management's power and abilities to run the organization in an optimum level as regards to coordination, planning, leading, and controlling employee activity towards the attainment of organizational goals. Six Likert-type questions were used to measure this variable. Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability was 0.85.   (4) Employee financial status that referred to employee salary and whether they felt that their salary and fringe benefits were fair and suitable to have a relatively comfortable life. Nine Likert-type questions were used to measure this variable. Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability was 0.88.   The dependent variable was administrative corruption and it referred to situations where organizational officials and employees felt that the use of their official status for personal gain was possible and justifiable. For example, respondents were asked to rate their following question: "since officials should be able to use their time and expertise in much needed places, they should not have to wait in queues like everyone else to get their usual chores done". Nine Likert-type questions were used to measure this variable. Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability was 0.90.   Analysis of variance, the T test, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to test the relationships among variables, and to test the theoretical model, regression analysis and the Lisrel software were utilized.     Discussion of Results and Conclusions   Research findings showed that the average amount of corruption 33.78 was higher than the expected average of 27. The amount of corruption differed by educational level, that is, as educational level increased the average amount of corruption decreased. It could be said that since jobs requiring higher levels of education also pay higher levels of wages and salaries, therefore their holders may not be as vulnerable to corruption as their counterparts with lower educational levels. The average amount of corruption for singles was 36.89 and that of married individuals was 33.19, therefore it could be said that marital status and corruption are related. Although it could be argued that since married people have more life obligations and therefore have higher expenses, thus being more vulnerable to financial corruptions, but the results showed that their average corruption levels are actually lower than singles. The higher levels of corruption among singles could be due to the fact that singles are less experienced and/or may have lower salaries, since in all probabilities; they were recently hired and are at lower levels of job rankings. It could also be argued that since singles have many more needs such as houses, automobiles, etc. they may be more vulnerable to corruption. No association was found between corruption and years of employment. This is actually interesting, since one may suspect that experience and tenure on the job could positively or negatively affect vulnerability to corruption and it is something that needs further investigation. The average amount of corruption for men was 33.47 and that of women was 34.22, and the results of the t-test showed that this difference was not statistically significant. This may seem odd because women's participation in out-of-home jobs in Iran is relatively recent and is not very significant- as far as numbers are concerned- and other studies have not found significant amounts of corruption among them. Further research in this area could be illuminating. The results of regression analysis indicated that organizational commitment (r= -0.61) and financial needs (r= 0.45) were the most important factors affecting corruption. The direction of these relationships is of importance. As one's commitment to the organization increases, his/her chances of committing corruption decreases. This means that organizational authorities should pay enormous attention to the ways and mechanisms that enhance employee commitment. Also, the direct association between financial needs and corruption also needs to be taken seriously, because it shows that as financial needs go up, so does the chances of committing corruption. There was a reverse association between job satisfaction and corruption (r= -0.35). This, like organizational commitment, seems reasonable and needs to be taken very seriously. Organizational authorities should be very keen to identify the factors that may lead to job dissatisfaction among employees and find ways to increase their job satisfaction. Managerial capabilities had the least amount of impact (r= 0.10). This is somewhat strange, since it appears that managerial capabilities should play a significant role in this area and other studies have found that managerial styles and capabilities do have an effect. Further research in this area can of course be very important. The coefficient of determination was 0.57 which, although is an acceptable level of goodness of fit, nevertheless, shows that all four independent variables could explain only about 57 percent of the variability of the dependent variable.       References   Abedi-jafari, Hasan; Hoseini-hashemnejad, Davood; Habibi, Leila. (2010). “A Comparison of the views and attitudes of male and female employees regarding administrative corruption”. Applied Research , The college of Management, University of Tehran, pp. 101-117   Baker, Terese, L. (2009). How Social Research is Done. Translated by Hooshang Naeni, Tehran: Nashre Ney   Burrell, Gibson, and Gareth Morgan.(1979). Sociological paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann publications.   Dadkhodae, Leila. (2011). “A Review of the performance of Transparency International regarding the measurement of Corruption”. Transcendental Law, no. 8-9, pp. 73-87   Danae-fard, Hasan. (2005). “Will Information Technology Decrease Administrative Corruption?” The Humanities Instructor, no. 39, pp. 101-118   Donya-e-Eqtesad. (2008). How Does State Economy affect Economic and administrative corruption?” an interview with Safdar Hoseini, Saeed Leylaz, and Dr. Ziba-kalam. No. 1576, pp. 8.   Faripoor, Faramarz. (1999). Corruption in Iran. Tehran: Enteshar publications   Iman, Mohammad Taghi; Esna-ashari, Farideh. (2004). “Studying the factors that affect Organizational Alienation in Iran (the organizations of Shiraz)”. The Research Journal of the University of Isfahan, vol. 17, no.2, pp. 31-58   Khezri, Mohammad. (2004). “administrative corruption”. Strategic studies Quarterly, no. 29, pp. 30-42   Kian Manesh, Camran. (2007). “A Reflection on the Issue of administrative corruption”. Tehran: Ertebatat va Fanavri   Lederman, Daniel& Loayza, Norman, and Soares, Rodrigo Reis .2001. Accountability and Corruption : Political Institutions Matter, social science research network.   Ritzer, George.(2011). Sociological Theory. Eighth edition. New York: mc graw Hill   Rabie, Ali. (2004). Long Live Corruption: Political sociology of Corruption in the Third World Governments. The Ministry of Islamic culture and Guidance   Rafipoor, Faramarz. (1997). Modernization and Conflict: An attempt toward the analysis of the Islamic Revolution and Social Problems o Iran. Tehran: shahid Beheshti University   Robbins, Stephen p. (1991). Organizational Behavior: concepts Controversies, and Applications. Fourth edition, new jersey: prentice-Hall, Inc   Sabatini , Fabio. (2005).”Dose social capital Improve Labor productivity in small and Medium Enterprises/” from : www.socialcapitalgetewat.org (sabatin:2005a)   Scott, Richard W.(1992). Organization: rational, natural, and open systems, third edition. New Jersey: prentice-Hall   .Shanon, A. R. (2003). The relationship between organized recreational programs and job satisfaction,” The University Connecticut   Singer, Marc J. (1999). Human Resources Management. Translated by Farideh Ale-agha. Tehran: the Center for Public administration Training   Steers, R.M. (1987). An introduction to organizational behavior". 3 rd ed. scot forsmand and company .   Tresiman, Daniel. 2000. The causes of corruption: a cross-national study, Journal of Public Economics, 76 pp 399 – 457.   www.Ostan yazd.ir   http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/jas/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-141&slc_lang=en&sid=1Administrative corruption organizational commitment managerial capabilities work satisfaction financial needs
spellingShingle Mansour Haghighatian
Somayeh Karimizadeh
Javad Nazari
An Analysis of Administrative Corruption (Administrative Organizations of Yazd City)
جامعه شناسی کاربردی
Administrative corruption
organizational commitment
managerial capabilities
work satisfaction
financial needs
title An Analysis of Administrative Corruption (Administrative Organizations of Yazd City)
title_full An Analysis of Administrative Corruption (Administrative Organizations of Yazd City)
title_fullStr An Analysis of Administrative Corruption (Administrative Organizations of Yazd City)
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Administrative Corruption (Administrative Organizations of Yazd City)
title_short An Analysis of Administrative Corruption (Administrative Organizations of Yazd City)
title_sort analysis of administrative corruption administrative organizations of yazd city
topic Administrative corruption
organizational commitment
managerial capabilities
work satisfaction
financial needs
url http://uijs.ui.ac.ir/jas/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-141&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT mansourhaghighatian ananalysisofadministrativecorruptionadministrativeorganizationsofyazdcity
AT somayehkarimizadeh ananalysisofadministrativecorruptionadministrativeorganizationsofyazdcity
AT javadnazari ananalysisofadministrativecorruptionadministrativeorganizationsofyazdcity
AT mansourhaghighatian analysisofadministrativecorruptionadministrativeorganizationsofyazdcity
AT somayehkarimizadeh analysisofadministrativecorruptionadministrativeorganizationsofyazdcity
AT javadnazari analysisofadministrativecorruptionadministrativeorganizationsofyazdcity