Different places, different problems: profiles of crime and disorder at residential parcels

Abstract Certain places generate inordinate amounts of crime and disorder. We examine how places differ in their nature of crime and disorder, with three objectives: (1) identifying a typology of profiles of crime and disorder; (2) assessing whether different forms of crime and disorder co-locate at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel T. O’Brien, Alina Ristea, Forrest Hangen, Riley Tucker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-06-01
Series:Crime Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-022-00165-0
_version_ 1811235657236873216
author Daniel T. O’Brien
Alina Ristea
Forrest Hangen
Riley Tucker
author_facet Daniel T. O’Brien
Alina Ristea
Forrest Hangen
Riley Tucker
author_sort Daniel T. O’Brien
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Certain places generate inordinate amounts of crime and disorder. We examine how places differ in their nature of crime and disorder, with three objectives: (1) identifying a typology of profiles of crime and disorder; (2) assessing whether different forms of crime and disorder co-locate at parcels; and (3) determining whether problematic parcels explain crime and disorder across neighborhoods. The study uses 911 and 311 records to quantify physical and social disorder and violent crime at residential parcels in Boston, MA (n = 81,673). K-means cluster analyses identified the typology of problematic parcels and how those types were distributed across census block groups. Cluster analysis identified five types of problematic parcels, four specializing in one form of crime or disorder and one that combined all issues. The second cluster analysis found that the distribution of problematic parcels described the spectrum from low- to high-crime neighborhoods, plus commercial districts with many parcels with public physical disorder. Problematic parcels modestly explained levels of crime across neighborhoods. The results suggest a need for diverse intervention strategies to support different types of problematic parcels; and that neighborhood dynamics pertaining to crime are greater than problematic properties alone.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:55:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-303fa28e7b634a4296f30beb3f6e26ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2193-7680
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:55:43Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Crime Science
spelling doaj.art-303fa28e7b634a4296f30beb3f6e26ca2022-12-22T03:34:01ZengBMCCrime Science2193-76802022-06-0111111210.1186/s40163-022-00165-0Different places, different problems: profiles of crime and disorder at residential parcelsDaniel T. O’Brien0Alina Ristea1Forrest Hangen2Riley Tucker3School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern UniversitySchool of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern UniversitySchool of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, Northeastern UniversitySchool of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northeastern UniversityAbstract Certain places generate inordinate amounts of crime and disorder. We examine how places differ in their nature of crime and disorder, with three objectives: (1) identifying a typology of profiles of crime and disorder; (2) assessing whether different forms of crime and disorder co-locate at parcels; and (3) determining whether problematic parcels explain crime and disorder across neighborhoods. The study uses 911 and 311 records to quantify physical and social disorder and violent crime at residential parcels in Boston, MA (n = 81,673). K-means cluster analyses identified the typology of problematic parcels and how those types were distributed across census block groups. Cluster analysis identified five types of problematic parcels, four specializing in one form of crime or disorder and one that combined all issues. The second cluster analysis found that the distribution of problematic parcels described the spectrum from low- to high-crime neighborhoods, plus commercial districts with many parcels with public physical disorder. Problematic parcels modestly explained levels of crime across neighborhoods. The results suggest a need for diverse intervention strategies to support different types of problematic parcels; and that neighborhood dynamics pertaining to crime are greater than problematic properties alone.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-022-00165-0Urban criminologyCommunities and crimeCriminology of placeProblem propertiesQuantitative methods
spellingShingle Daniel T. O’Brien
Alina Ristea
Forrest Hangen
Riley Tucker
Different places, different problems: profiles of crime and disorder at residential parcels
Crime Science
Urban criminology
Communities and crime
Criminology of place
Problem properties
Quantitative methods
title Different places, different problems: profiles of crime and disorder at residential parcels
title_full Different places, different problems: profiles of crime and disorder at residential parcels
title_fullStr Different places, different problems: profiles of crime and disorder at residential parcels
title_full_unstemmed Different places, different problems: profiles of crime and disorder at residential parcels
title_short Different places, different problems: profiles of crime and disorder at residential parcels
title_sort different places different problems profiles of crime and disorder at residential parcels
topic Urban criminology
Communities and crime
Criminology of place
Problem properties
Quantitative methods
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-022-00165-0
work_keys_str_mv AT danieltobrien differentplacesdifferentproblemsprofilesofcrimeanddisorderatresidentialparcels
AT alinaristea differentplacesdifferentproblemsprofilesofcrimeanddisorderatresidentialparcels
AT forresthangen differentplacesdifferentproblemsprofilesofcrimeanddisorderatresidentialparcels
AT rileytucker differentplacesdifferentproblemsprofilesofcrimeanddisorderatresidentialparcels