The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation
The aim of this study is to examine the results of the experiment when phonologically and acoustically similar and non-similar word lists of four conditions are presented in three different retention intervals. The relevant literature about short trem memory is summarized within the models of Alan B...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Muhammed Yıldız
2018-12-01
|
| Series: | Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/605456 |
| _version_ | 1797914274711994368 |
|---|---|
| author | Nilgun Cepelioğullar |
| author_facet | Nilgun Cepelioğullar |
| author_sort | Nilgun Cepelioğullar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of this study is to examine the results of the experiment when phonologically and acoustically similar and non-similar word lists of four conditions are presented in three different retention intervals. The relevant literature about short trem memory is summarized within the models of Alan Baddeley’s Working Memory Model, James Nairne’s Feature Model and Dylan M. Jones, Robert W. Hughes, William J. Macken’s Perceptual Model. The effects of phonological similarity, acoustic similarity, modality and retention interval are examined through these models. In the present experiment; phonologically and acoustically similar and non-similar lists of five words are presented in four conditions among three different intervals with the participation of 80 students from Uludag University. After examinig the data it was found that phonological similarity had a main effect as the similar lists were recalled less correctly; serial position had a main effect in terms of recency and primacy; and retention interval had a main effect as the longer the interval gets, the recall performance drops. Phonological similarity proved to be effective as opposed to the findings ine the literature found before. Acoustic similarity had no main effect like theorized as the models that focus the importance on the perceptual features. The results are discussed through the relevant literature and the summarized models and suggestions are made regarding the studies that can be carried out from now on. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T12:24:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-304046f6d6d7403f91d0452e107b1676 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2587-1536 2587-1536 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T12:24:15Z |
| publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
| publisher | Muhammed Yıldız |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi |
| spelling | doaj.art-304046f6d6d7403f91d0452e107b16762023-02-15T16:15:15ZengMuhammed YıldızYaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi2587-15362587-15362018-12-012442944010.31461/ybpd.500804The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry RepresantationNilgun CepelioğullarThe aim of this study is to examine the results of the experiment when phonologically and acoustically similar and non-similar word lists of four conditions are presented in three different retention intervals. The relevant literature about short trem memory is summarized within the models of Alan Baddeley’s Working Memory Model, James Nairne’s Feature Model and Dylan M. Jones, Robert W. Hughes, William J. Macken’s Perceptual Model. The effects of phonological similarity, acoustic similarity, modality and retention interval are examined through these models. In the present experiment; phonologically and acoustically similar and non-similar lists of five words are presented in four conditions among three different intervals with the participation of 80 students from Uludag University. After examinig the data it was found that phonological similarity had a main effect as the similar lists were recalled less correctly; serial position had a main effect in terms of recency and primacy; and retention interval had a main effect as the longer the interval gets, the recall performance drops. Phonological similarity proved to be effective as opposed to the findings ine the literature found before. Acoustic similarity had no main effect like theorized as the models that focus the importance on the perceptual features. The results are discussed through the relevant literature and the summarized models and suggestions are made regarding the studies that can be carried out from now on.http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/605456Working MemoryPhonological SimilarityAcoustic SimilarityRetention Interval |
| spellingShingle | Nilgun Cepelioğullar The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi Working Memory Phonological Similarity Acoustic Similarity Retention Interval |
| title | The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation |
| title_full | The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation |
| title_fullStr | The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation |
| title_short | The Interaction between Phonological Similarity, Acoustic Similarity and Retention Interval under Audiotry Represantation |
| title_sort | interaction between phonological similarity acoustic similarity and retention interval under audiotry represantation |
| topic | Working Memory Phonological Similarity Acoustic Similarity Retention Interval |
| url | http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/605456 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nilguncepeliogullar theinteractionbetweenphonologicalsimilarityacousticsimilarityandretentionintervalunderaudiotryrepresantation AT nilguncepeliogullar interactionbetweenphonologicalsimilarityacousticsimilarityandretentionintervalunderaudiotryrepresantation |