In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca

Objetive: To compare in vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with 50% ethanolic extract of Musa paradisiaca and 35% hydrogen peroxide. Material and Methods: The study was experimental and used 18 premolars that were grouped into: G1 (control), G2 (50% ethanol extract of Musa pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Úrsula Pantigozo-Morán, José González-Cabeza, María Espinoza-Salcedo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Concepción. 2022-06-01
Series:Journal of Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://joralres.com/index.php/JOralRes/article/view/joralres.2022.039/1056
_version_ 1797944126310711296
author Úrsula Pantigozo-Morán
José González-Cabeza
María Espinoza-Salcedo
author_facet Úrsula Pantigozo-Morán
José González-Cabeza
María Espinoza-Salcedo
author_sort Úrsula Pantigozo-Morán
collection DOAJ
description Objetive: To compare in vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with 50% ethanolic extract of Musa paradisiaca and 35% hydrogen peroxide. Material and Methods: The study was experimental and used 18 premolars that were grouped into: G1 (control), G2 (50% ethanol extract of Musa paradisiaca) and G3 (35% hydrogen peroxide). The teeth were then exposed to a Streptococcus mutans culture for 24 hours, followed by centrifugation in thioglycolate broth. A culture on trypticase soy agar was done with a 1 in 100 dilution, and after 48 hours colony forming units (CFU) were counted. Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA test, complemented by the Bonferroni post-hoc. Results: Bacterial adherence was 77x105 CFU/ml in Group 3 using 35% hydrogen peroxide, 40x105 CFU/ml in Group 2 using 50% ethanol extract of Musa paradisiaca, and 89x104 CFU/ml in Group 1 (control). The difference between the three groups was significant (p=0.000). Conclusion: Both whitening methods cause bacterial adherence to the tooth surface, although to a lower degree with Musa paradisiaca.eses.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:34:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3060861dc96a427f894d02295c7cbc7c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0719-2460
0719-2479
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:34:45Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Universidad de Concepción.
record_format Article
series Journal of Oral Research
spelling doaj.art-3060861dc96a427f894d02295c7cbc7c2023-01-24T23:44:23ZengUniversidad de Concepción.Journal of Oral Research0719-24600719-24792022-06-01113111https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2022.039In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiacaÚrsula Pantigozo-Morán0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3640-0826José González-Cabeza1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3022-9423María Espinoza-Salcedo2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9408-4396Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Práctica Privada – Perú.Laboratorio de Microbiología Molecular y Biotecnología. Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego – Perú.Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Práctica Privada – Perú.Objetive: To compare in vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with 50% ethanolic extract of Musa paradisiaca and 35% hydrogen peroxide. Material and Methods: The study was experimental and used 18 premolars that were grouped into: G1 (control), G2 (50% ethanol extract of Musa paradisiaca) and G3 (35% hydrogen peroxide). The teeth were then exposed to a Streptococcus mutans culture for 24 hours, followed by centrifugation in thioglycolate broth. A culture on trypticase soy agar was done with a 1 in 100 dilution, and after 48 hours colony forming units (CFU) were counted. Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA test, complemented by the Bonferroni post-hoc. Results: Bacterial adherence was 77x105 CFU/ml in Group 3 using 35% hydrogen peroxide, 40x105 CFU/ml in Group 2 using 50% ethanol extract of Musa paradisiaca, and 89x104 CFU/ml in Group 1 (control). The difference between the three groups was significant (p=0.000). Conclusion: Both whitening methods cause bacterial adherence to the tooth surface, although to a lower degree with Musa paradisiaca.eses.https://joralres.com/index.php/JOralRes/article/view/joralres.2022.039/1056tooth bleachingplant extractsmusa paradisiacahydrogen peroxidebacterial adherencestreptococcus mutans
spellingShingle Úrsula Pantigozo-Morán
José González-Cabeza
María Espinoza-Salcedo
In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca
Journal of Oral Research
tooth bleaching
plant extracts
musa paradisiaca
hydrogen peroxide
bacterial adherence
streptococcus mutans
title In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca
title_full In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca
title_fullStr In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca
title_full_unstemmed In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca
title_short In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca
title_sort in vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with musa paradisiaca
topic tooth bleaching
plant extracts
musa paradisiaca
hydrogen peroxide
bacterial adherence
streptococcus mutans
url https://joralres.com/index.php/JOralRes/article/view/joralres.2022.039/1056
work_keys_str_mv AT ursulapantigozomoran invitrobacterialadherenceonteethsubmittedtowhiteningwithmusaparadisiaca
AT josegonzalezcabeza invitrobacterialadherenceonteethsubmittedtowhiteningwithmusaparadisiaca
AT mariaespinozasalcedo invitrobacterialadherenceonteethsubmittedtowhiteningwithmusaparadisiaca