In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca
Objetive: To compare in vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with 50% ethanolic extract of Musa paradisiaca and 35% hydrogen peroxide. Material and Methods: The study was experimental and used 18 premolars that were grouped into: G1 (control), G2 (50% ethanol extract of Musa pa...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad de Concepción.
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Oral Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://joralres.com/index.php/JOralRes/article/view/joralres.2022.039/1056 |
_version_ | 1797944126310711296 |
---|---|
author | Úrsula Pantigozo-Morán José González-Cabeza María Espinoza-Salcedo |
author_facet | Úrsula Pantigozo-Morán José González-Cabeza María Espinoza-Salcedo |
author_sort | Úrsula Pantigozo-Morán |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objetive: To compare in vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with 50% ethanolic extract of Musa paradisiaca and 35% hydrogen peroxide.
Material and Methods: The study was experimental and used 18 premolars that were grouped into: G1 (control), G2 (50% ethanol extract of Musa paradisiaca) and G3 (35% hydrogen peroxide). The teeth were then exposed to a Streptococcus mutans culture for 24 hours, followed by centrifugation in thioglycolate broth. A culture on trypticase soy agar was done with a 1 in 100 dilution, and after 48 hours colony forming units (CFU) were counted. Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA test, complemented by the Bonferroni post-hoc.
Results: Bacterial adherence was 77x105 CFU/ml in Group 3 using 35% hydrogen peroxide, 40x105 CFU/ml in Group 2 using 50% ethanol extract of Musa paradisiaca, and 89x104 CFU/ml in Group 1 (control). The difference between the three groups was significant (p=0.000).
Conclusion: Both whitening methods cause bacterial adherence to the tooth surface, although to a lower degree with Musa paradisiaca.eses. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T20:34:45Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3060861dc96a427f894d02295c7cbc7c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0719-2460 0719-2479 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T20:34:45Z |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | Universidad de Concepción. |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Oral Research |
spelling | doaj.art-3060861dc96a427f894d02295c7cbc7c2023-01-24T23:44:23ZengUniversidad de Concepción.Journal of Oral Research0719-24600719-24792022-06-01113111https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2022.039In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiacaÚrsula Pantigozo-Morán0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3640-0826José González-Cabeza1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3022-9423María Espinoza-Salcedo2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9408-4396Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Práctica Privada – Perú.Laboratorio de Microbiología Molecular y Biotecnología. Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego – Perú.Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Práctica Privada – Perú.Objetive: To compare in vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with 50% ethanolic extract of Musa paradisiaca and 35% hydrogen peroxide. Material and Methods: The study was experimental and used 18 premolars that were grouped into: G1 (control), G2 (50% ethanol extract of Musa paradisiaca) and G3 (35% hydrogen peroxide). The teeth were then exposed to a Streptococcus mutans culture for 24 hours, followed by centrifugation in thioglycolate broth. A culture on trypticase soy agar was done with a 1 in 100 dilution, and after 48 hours colony forming units (CFU) were counted. Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA test, complemented by the Bonferroni post-hoc. Results: Bacterial adherence was 77x105 CFU/ml in Group 3 using 35% hydrogen peroxide, 40x105 CFU/ml in Group 2 using 50% ethanol extract of Musa paradisiaca, and 89x104 CFU/ml in Group 1 (control). The difference between the three groups was significant (p=0.000). Conclusion: Both whitening methods cause bacterial adherence to the tooth surface, although to a lower degree with Musa paradisiaca.eses.https://joralres.com/index.php/JOralRes/article/view/joralres.2022.039/1056tooth bleachingplant extractsmusa paradisiacahydrogen peroxidebacterial adherencestreptococcus mutans |
spellingShingle | Úrsula Pantigozo-Morán José González-Cabeza María Espinoza-Salcedo In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca Journal of Oral Research tooth bleaching plant extracts musa paradisiaca hydrogen peroxide bacterial adherence streptococcus mutans |
title | In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca |
title_full | In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca |
title_fullStr | In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca |
title_short | In vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with Musa paradisiaca |
title_sort | in vitro bacterial adherence on teeth submitted to whitening with musa paradisiaca |
topic | tooth bleaching plant extracts musa paradisiaca hydrogen peroxide bacterial adherence streptococcus mutans |
url | https://joralres.com/index.php/JOralRes/article/view/joralres.2022.039/1056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ursulapantigozomoran invitrobacterialadherenceonteethsubmittedtowhiteningwithmusaparadisiaca AT josegonzalezcabeza invitrobacterialadherenceonteethsubmittedtowhiteningwithmusaparadisiaca AT mariaespinozasalcedo invitrobacterialadherenceonteethsubmittedtowhiteningwithmusaparadisiaca |