News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices
Social acceleration has been a catalyst for rapid changes concerning the mediascapes of European societies. Democratic societies need deliberation, but what kinds of journalism and communication cultures are supported by different stakeholders and structural possibilities? The aim of this article is...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cogitatio
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Media and Communication |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7199 |
| _version_ | 1797354927746449408 |
|---|---|
| author | Halliki Harro-Loit Tobias Eberwein |
| author_facet | Halliki Harro-Loit Tobias Eberwein |
| author_sort | Halliki Harro-Loit |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Social acceleration has been a catalyst for rapid changes concerning the mediascapes of European societies. Democratic societies need deliberation, but what kinds of journalism and communication cultures are supported by different stakeholders and structural possibilities? The aim of this article is to conceptualise and analyse the risks and opportunities concerning the monitoring capabilities in key domains of the media field. This includes the performance and normative regulation of news media (journalism) as well as media usage patterns and competencies of different actors, all of which influence the quality of deliberative communication across cultures. The monitoring potential is related to various stakeholders who gather data and information on media and media usage, transform the information into knowledge, and use this knowledge to create evidence-based media policy. What interests and values are served by which stakeholders and how does this actual monitoring serve the media policy in different European countries? What is the role and resources of media researchers? These questions are answered with the help of an extensive literature review and a synoptic analysis of the monitoring capabilities of 14 European countries, based on original case studies. The article will, thus, broaden the conceptual understanding of risks and opportunities for deliberative communication in democratic societies—and at the same time offer an initial inventory of typical problems and best practices for monitoring deliberative communication across Europe. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T13:56:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-308d0e8c4f614875a5d29690f36307b1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2183-2439 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T13:56:54Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Cogitatio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Media and Communication |
| spelling | doaj.art-308d0e8c4f614875a5d29690f36307b12024-01-15T12:06:47ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392024-01-0112010.17645/mac.71993342News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best PracticesHalliki Harro-Loit0Tobias Eberwein1Institute of Social Studies, University of Tartu, EstoniaInstitute for Comparative Media and Communication Studies (CMC), Austrian Academy of Sciences, AustriaSocial acceleration has been a catalyst for rapid changes concerning the mediascapes of European societies. Democratic societies need deliberation, but what kinds of journalism and communication cultures are supported by different stakeholders and structural possibilities? The aim of this article is to conceptualise and analyse the risks and opportunities concerning the monitoring capabilities in key domains of the media field. This includes the performance and normative regulation of news media (journalism) as well as media usage patterns and competencies of different actors, all of which influence the quality of deliberative communication across cultures. The monitoring potential is related to various stakeholders who gather data and information on media and media usage, transform the information into knowledge, and use this knowledge to create evidence-based media policy. What interests and values are served by which stakeholders and how does this actual monitoring serve the media policy in different European countries? What is the role and resources of media researchers? These questions are answered with the help of an extensive literature review and a synoptic analysis of the monitoring capabilities of 14 European countries, based on original case studies. The article will, thus, broaden the conceptual understanding of risks and opportunities for deliberative communication in democratic societies—and at the same time offer an initial inventory of typical problems and best practices for monitoring deliberative communication across Europe.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7199deliberative communicationeuropemedia monitoringmonitoring capabilitiesrisks and opportunitiesstructure and agency |
| spellingShingle | Halliki Harro-Loit Tobias Eberwein News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices Media and Communication deliberative communication europe media monitoring monitoring capabilities risks and opportunities structure and agency |
| title | News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
| title_full | News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
| title_fullStr | News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
| title_full_unstemmed | News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
| title_short | News Media Monitoring Capabilities in 14 European Countries: Problems and Best Practices |
| title_sort | news media monitoring capabilities in 14 european countries problems and best practices |
| topic | deliberative communication europe media monitoring monitoring capabilities risks and opportunities structure and agency |
| url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7199 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hallikiharroloit newsmediamonitoringcapabilitiesin14europeancountriesproblemsandbestpractices AT tobiaseberwein newsmediamonitoringcapabilitiesin14europeancountriesproblemsandbestpractices |