The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common problem and we sought to examine the burden of disease and its management in Canada from the perspectives of patients and physicians.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two parallel, Cana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keith Paul K, Desrosiers Martin, Laister Tina, Schellenberg R, Waserman Susan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-06-01
Series:Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aacijournal.com/content/8/1/7
_version_ 1818677407162302464
author Keith Paul K
Desrosiers Martin
Laister Tina
Schellenberg R
Waserman Susan
author_facet Keith Paul K
Desrosiers Martin
Laister Tina
Schellenberg R
Waserman Susan
author_sort Keith Paul K
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common problem and we sought to examine the burden of disease and its management in Canada from the perspectives of patients and physicians.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two parallel, Canadawide structured telephone interviews surveyed 1,001 AR patients and 160 physicians in July 2006.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>44% of patients had experienced nasal symptoms unrelated to a cold and 20% had a physician diagnosis of AR. At screening 27% reported asthma, 15% chronic or recurrent sinusitis and 5% nasal polyps. With attacks nasal congestion and runny nose were the most bothersome symptoms. Other problems experienced were fatigue (46%), poor concentration (32%), and reduced productivity (23%). Most (77%) had not seen a physician in the past year. Physicians estimated they prescribed intranasal cortico steroids (INCS) to most AR patients (77%) consistent with guidelines but only 19% of patients had used one in the last month. Only 48% of patients were very satisfied with their current INCS. 41% of AR patients reported discontinuing their INCS with the most common reason being a perceived lack of long-lasting symptom relief (44%). 52% of patients felt that their current INCS lost effectiveness over 24 h. The most common INCS side effects included dripping down the throat, bad taste, and dryness. Most AR patients reported lifestyle limitations despite treatment (66%). 61% of patients felt that their symptoms were only somewhat controlled or poorly/not controlled during their worst month in the past year.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>AR symptoms are common and many patients experience inadequate control. Physicians report they commonly prescribe intranasal corticosteroids, but patient’s perceived loss of efficacy and side effects lead to their discontinuation. Persistent relief of allergic rhinitis symptoms remains a major unmet need. Better treatments and education are required.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-17T08:58:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-30913f28212c4a4b9e3b681c156275d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1710-1484
1710-1492
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T08:58:53Z
publishDate 2012-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
spelling doaj.art-30913f28212c4a4b9e3b681c156275d42022-12-21T21:55:50ZengBMCAllergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology1710-14841710-14922012-06-0181710.1186/1710-1492-8-7The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patientsKeith Paul KDesrosiers MartinLaister TinaSchellenberg RWaserman Susan<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common problem and we sought to examine the burden of disease and its management in Canada from the perspectives of patients and physicians.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Two parallel, Canadawide structured telephone interviews surveyed 1,001 AR patients and 160 physicians in July 2006.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>44% of patients had experienced nasal symptoms unrelated to a cold and 20% had a physician diagnosis of AR. At screening 27% reported asthma, 15% chronic or recurrent sinusitis and 5% nasal polyps. With attacks nasal congestion and runny nose were the most bothersome symptoms. Other problems experienced were fatigue (46%), poor concentration (32%), and reduced productivity (23%). Most (77%) had not seen a physician in the past year. Physicians estimated they prescribed intranasal cortico steroids (INCS) to most AR patients (77%) consistent with guidelines but only 19% of patients had used one in the last month. Only 48% of patients were very satisfied with their current INCS. 41% of AR patients reported discontinuing their INCS with the most common reason being a perceived lack of long-lasting symptom relief (44%). 52% of patients felt that their current INCS lost effectiveness over 24 h. The most common INCS side effects included dripping down the throat, bad taste, and dryness. Most AR patients reported lifestyle limitations despite treatment (66%). 61% of patients felt that their symptoms were only somewhat controlled or poorly/not controlled during their worst month in the past year.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>AR symptoms are common and many patients experience inadequate control. Physicians report they commonly prescribe intranasal corticosteroids, but patient’s perceived loss of efficacy and side effects lead to their discontinuation. Persistent relief of allergic rhinitis symptoms remains a major unmet need. Better treatments and education are required.</p>http://www.aacijournal.com/content/8/1/7Rhinitis, AllergicAnti-allergic agentsAdministration, IntranasalQuality of life
spellingShingle Keith Paul K
Desrosiers Martin
Laister Tina
Schellenberg R
Waserman Susan
The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Rhinitis, Allergic
Anti-allergic agents
Administration, Intranasal
Quality of life
title The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title_full The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title_fullStr The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title_full_unstemmed The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title_short The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title_sort burden of allergic rhinitis ar in canada perspectives of physicians and patients
topic Rhinitis, Allergic
Anti-allergic agents
Administration, Intranasal
Quality of life
url http://www.aacijournal.com/content/8/1/7
work_keys_str_mv AT keithpaulk theburdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT desrosiersmartin theburdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT laistertina theburdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT schellenbergr theburdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT wasermansusan theburdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT keithpaulk burdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT desrosiersmartin burdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT laistertina burdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT schellenbergr burdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT wasermansusan burdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients