Hierarchical linear modelling of educational outcomes in secondary schools: What matters – teachers’ or administrators’ input?
Research has assessed the diverse characteristics of principals and teachers in analysing students’ educational outcomes at various levels. However, these studies often focus on the cognitive domain of learning, ignoring the affective and psychomotor aspects. Bridging this gap, we used hierarchical...
Main Authors: | John A. Ekpenyong, Valentine J. Owan, Joseph O. Ogar, John A. Undie |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Cogent Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2133491 |
Similar Items
-
Family and community inputs as predictors of students’ overall, cognitive, affective and psychomotor learning outcomes in secondary schools
by: John A. Ekpenyong, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Innate ability, health, motivation, and social capital as predictors of students’ cognitive, affective and psychomotor learning outcomes in secondary schools
by: Valentine Joseph Owan, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Relationship between Transformational Leadership Style and Leadership Thinking of Provincial Administration Leaders
by: Thanh Nguyen Hai, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01) -
PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LEADERS – MANAGERS’ OF SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS MANAGEMENT STYLE
by: Valeria Milyaeva, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Harnessing Leadership Styles to Enhance the Effectiveness of Secondary Schools Dynamics in the Vhembe District
by: Thivhavhudzi Muriel Badugela
Published: (2024-10-01)