MODELING YIELD, SOIL WATER BALANCE, AND ECONOMIC RETURN OF SOYBEAN UNDER DIFFERENT WATER DEFICIT LEVELS

ABSTRACT Evaluating the impacts of water stress on crop yield allows comparing irrigation management alternatives, aiming to ensure an economic return for the irrigated farms. Thus, the main objectives of this study were to model the soil water balance, deriving the crop coefficients, grain yield pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mirta T. Petry, Laudenir J. Basso, Reimar Carlesso, Maria S. Armoa, Jonas R. Henkes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola 2020-08-01
Series:Engenharia Agrícola
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162020000400526&tlng=en
_version_ 1818719820511707136
author Mirta T. Petry
Laudenir J. Basso
Reimar Carlesso
Maria S. Armoa
Jonas R. Henkes
author_facet Mirta T. Petry
Laudenir J. Basso
Reimar Carlesso
Maria S. Armoa
Jonas R. Henkes
author_sort Mirta T. Petry
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Evaluating the impacts of water stress on crop yield allows comparing irrigation management alternatives, aiming to ensure an economic return for the irrigated farms. Thus, the main objectives of this study were to model the soil water balance, deriving the crop coefficients, grain yield prediction, and economic return of soybean grown at different levels of water deficit and price quotations. The experiment was carried out under a rainout shelter, using four irrigation water managements. Irrigations were applied when the soil available water in the root zone reached 75%, 64%, 60%, and 50% of the total available water (TAW). Crop and soil parameters were monitored throughout the crop season. The SIMDualKc model was used to simulate the soil water balance. Statistics indicators demonstrated the goodness of the simulation, with regression coefficients (b0) ranging from 0.96 and 0.99 and root mean square errors (RMSE) ≤8.4 mm. Crop coefficients for initial, intermediate, and final stages were calibrated and validated at 0.15, 1.00, and 0.10, respectively. Crop yield and economic return were higher for the treatment kept at 75% of TAW, results that should be considered in irrigation management programs.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T20:13:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-309851e8746342db86bae86c3595dad8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0100-6916
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T20:13:01Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
record_format Article
series Engenharia Agrícola
spelling doaj.art-309851e8746342db86bae86c3595dad82022-12-21T21:34:12ZengSociedade Brasileira de Engenharia AgrícolaEngenharia Agrícola0100-69162020-08-0140452653510.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v40n4p526-535/2020MODELING YIELD, SOIL WATER BALANCE, AND ECONOMIC RETURN OF SOYBEAN UNDER DIFFERENT WATER DEFICIT LEVELSMirta T. Petryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4933-607XLaudenir J. BassoReimar CarlessoMaria S. ArmoaJonas R. HenkesABSTRACT Evaluating the impacts of water stress on crop yield allows comparing irrigation management alternatives, aiming to ensure an economic return for the irrigated farms. Thus, the main objectives of this study were to model the soil water balance, deriving the crop coefficients, grain yield prediction, and economic return of soybean grown at different levels of water deficit and price quotations. The experiment was carried out under a rainout shelter, using four irrigation water managements. Irrigations were applied when the soil available water in the root zone reached 75%, 64%, 60%, and 50% of the total available water (TAW). Crop and soil parameters were monitored throughout the crop season. The SIMDualKc model was used to simulate the soil water balance. Statistics indicators demonstrated the goodness of the simulation, with regression coefficients (b0) ranging from 0.96 and 0.99 and root mean square errors (RMSE) ≤8.4 mm. Crop coefficients for initial, intermediate, and final stages were calibrated and validated at 0.15, 1.00, and 0.10, respectively. Crop yield and economic return were higher for the treatment kept at 75% of TAW, results that should be considered in irrigation management programs.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162020000400526&tlng=enGlycine maxsoil water balanceSIMDualKc modeleconomic return
spellingShingle Mirta T. Petry
Laudenir J. Basso
Reimar Carlesso
Maria S. Armoa
Jonas R. Henkes
MODELING YIELD, SOIL WATER BALANCE, AND ECONOMIC RETURN OF SOYBEAN UNDER DIFFERENT WATER DEFICIT LEVELS
Engenharia Agrícola
Glycine max
soil water balance
SIMDualKc model
economic return
title MODELING YIELD, SOIL WATER BALANCE, AND ECONOMIC RETURN OF SOYBEAN UNDER DIFFERENT WATER DEFICIT LEVELS
title_full MODELING YIELD, SOIL WATER BALANCE, AND ECONOMIC RETURN OF SOYBEAN UNDER DIFFERENT WATER DEFICIT LEVELS
title_fullStr MODELING YIELD, SOIL WATER BALANCE, AND ECONOMIC RETURN OF SOYBEAN UNDER DIFFERENT WATER DEFICIT LEVELS
title_full_unstemmed MODELING YIELD, SOIL WATER BALANCE, AND ECONOMIC RETURN OF SOYBEAN UNDER DIFFERENT WATER DEFICIT LEVELS
title_short MODELING YIELD, SOIL WATER BALANCE, AND ECONOMIC RETURN OF SOYBEAN UNDER DIFFERENT WATER DEFICIT LEVELS
title_sort modeling yield soil water balance and economic return of soybean under different water deficit levels
topic Glycine max
soil water balance
SIMDualKc model
economic return
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162020000400526&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT mirtatpetry modelingyieldsoilwaterbalanceandeconomicreturnofsoybeanunderdifferentwaterdeficitlevels
AT laudenirjbasso modelingyieldsoilwaterbalanceandeconomicreturnofsoybeanunderdifferentwaterdeficitlevels
AT reimarcarlesso modelingyieldsoilwaterbalanceandeconomicreturnofsoybeanunderdifferentwaterdeficitlevels
AT mariasarmoa modelingyieldsoilwaterbalanceandeconomicreturnofsoybeanunderdifferentwaterdeficitlevels
AT jonasrhenkes modelingyieldsoilwaterbalanceandeconomicreturnofsoybeanunderdifferentwaterdeficitlevels