Refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditions
<h4>Purpose</h4> We investigated the effect of luminance on refraction and visual function under twilight conditions. <h4>Methods</h4> Twenty young adults (mean age 20.5 ± 0.5 years) without ocular diseases and 20 eyes were included in the study. Subjective and objective sphe...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012392/?tool=EBI |
| _version_ | 1818025282579202048 |
|---|---|
| author | Tatsuya Iizuka Takushi Kawamorita Tomoya Handa Hitoshi Ishikawa |
| author_facet | Tatsuya Iizuka Takushi Kawamorita Tomoya Handa Hitoshi Ishikawa |
| author_sort | Tatsuya Iizuka |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Purpose</h4> We investigated the effect of luminance on refraction and visual function under twilight conditions. <h4>Methods</h4> Twenty young adults (mean age 20.5 ± 0.5 years) without ocular diseases and 20 eyes were included in the study. Subjective and objective spherical equivalent power (SE), logMAR, pupil diameter, ocular aberration, and ocular axial length were evaluated. Measurements were conducted in a light room with high luminance (300 cd/m2) targets (photopic), in a dark room with low luminance (10 cd/m2) targets (twilight), and a dark room after 15 min of adaptation to low luminance (10 cd/m2) targets (after adaptation: AA). Differences between the three conditions were analyzed using the Friedman test and Scheffe’s multiple comparisons. <h4>Results</h4> The results of logMAR were -0.20 ± 0.07, -0.08 ± 0.08, and -0.11 ± 0.08 in photopic, twilight, and AA, respectively, with significant differences between photopic and twilight (p < 0.001) and between photopic and AA (p < 0.001). Then subjective SE were -3.58 ± 2.04 D, -3.75 ± 2.08 D, and -3.74 ± 2.04 D in photopic, twilight, and AA, respectively, with significant differences between photopic and twilight (p = 0.007) and photopic and AA (p = 0.023). However, none of the other objective SEs produced a significant difference (p = 0.63). The pupil diameter and ocular aberration changed significantly in all conditions (p < 0.001). <h4>Conclusions</h4> Subjective myopic refraction increased and visual resolution decreased in younger subjects. However, this change in refraction is less than one level (±0.25 D) in clinical optometry, so fully corrected eyeglasses are important when assuming refraction in twilight, and there is no need for additional correction. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T04:13:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-309ed6f51fea4dffb26190f658965ea6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T04:13:38Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-309ed6f51fea4dffb26190f658965ea62022-12-22T02:02:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01174Refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditionsTatsuya IizukaTakushi KawamoritaTomoya HandaHitoshi Ishikawa<h4>Purpose</h4> We investigated the effect of luminance on refraction and visual function under twilight conditions. <h4>Methods</h4> Twenty young adults (mean age 20.5 ± 0.5 years) without ocular diseases and 20 eyes were included in the study. Subjective and objective spherical equivalent power (SE), logMAR, pupil diameter, ocular aberration, and ocular axial length were evaluated. Measurements were conducted in a light room with high luminance (300 cd/m2) targets (photopic), in a dark room with low luminance (10 cd/m2) targets (twilight), and a dark room after 15 min of adaptation to low luminance (10 cd/m2) targets (after adaptation: AA). Differences between the three conditions were analyzed using the Friedman test and Scheffe’s multiple comparisons. <h4>Results</h4> The results of logMAR were -0.20 ± 0.07, -0.08 ± 0.08, and -0.11 ± 0.08 in photopic, twilight, and AA, respectively, with significant differences between photopic and twilight (p < 0.001) and between photopic and AA (p < 0.001). Then subjective SE were -3.58 ± 2.04 D, -3.75 ± 2.08 D, and -3.74 ± 2.04 D in photopic, twilight, and AA, respectively, with significant differences between photopic and twilight (p = 0.007) and photopic and AA (p = 0.023). However, none of the other objective SEs produced a significant difference (p = 0.63). The pupil diameter and ocular aberration changed significantly in all conditions (p < 0.001). <h4>Conclusions</h4> Subjective myopic refraction increased and visual resolution decreased in younger subjects. However, this change in refraction is less than one level (±0.25 D) in clinical optometry, so fully corrected eyeglasses are important when assuming refraction in twilight, and there is no need for additional correction.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012392/?tool=EBI |
| spellingShingle | Tatsuya Iizuka Takushi Kawamorita Tomoya Handa Hitoshi Ishikawa Refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditions PLoS ONE |
| title | Refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditions |
| title_full | Refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditions |
| title_fullStr | Refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditions |
| title_short | Refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditions |
| title_sort | refractive and visual function changes in twilight conditions |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012392/?tool=EBI |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tatsuyaiizuka refractiveandvisualfunctionchangesintwilightconditions AT takushikawamorita refractiveandvisualfunctionchangesintwilightconditions AT tomoyahanda refractiveandvisualfunctionchangesintwilightconditions AT hitoshiishikawa refractiveandvisualfunctionchangesintwilightconditions |