Successful students’ negotiation of township schooling in contemporary South Africa

This article draws on data from a larger longitudinal qualitative case study which is tracking the progress of students over the course of their undergraduate degrees at a South African university. For this paper, we used background questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with 62 first-year s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rochelle Kapp, Tracy S. Craig, Robert Prince, Elmi Badenhorst, Viki Janse van Rensburg, June Pym, Bongi Bangeni, Kate le Roux, Ermien van Pletzen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2014-09-01
Series:Perspectives in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie/article/view/1871
Description
Summary:This article draws on data from a larger longitudinal qualitative case study which is tracking the progress of students over the course of their undergraduate degrees at a South African university. For this paper, we used background questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with 62 first-year students from working-class, township schools who were first registered for Extended Degree Programmes in 2009. The article draws on post-structuralist theory on learning and identity to describe and analyse the participants’ perspectives on how they negotiated their high school contexts. We analyse the subject positions in which participants invested, as well as how they negotiated their way through social networks and used resources. Our data illustrate the ways in which students had to carry the burden of negotiating their way through home, school and neighbourhood spaces that were generally not conducive to learning. Nevertheless, participants consciously positioned themselves as agents. They were resilient, motivated and took highly strategic adult decisions about their learning. We argue that a focus on how successful students negotiate their environments challenges the pathologising paradigm of “disadvantage” that characterises research and debates in higher education. It also offers an additional lens for admissions processes and for providing appropriate intervention strategies in the tertiary setting.
ISSN:0258-2236
2519-593X