The Biodiversity of Grapevine Bacterial Endophytes of <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr.

In this paper, the composition profiles of bacterial endophytes in wild-growing Amur grape <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr. grown in the south of the Russian Far East were analyzed using both a cultivation-dependent (sowing bacteria) and a cultivation-independent (next generation sequencing,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olga A. Aleynova, Nikolay N. Nityagovsky, Alexandra S. Dubrovina, Konstantin V. Kiselev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Plants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/9/1128
_version_ 1797503297494450176
author Olga A. Aleynova
Nikolay N. Nityagovsky
Alexandra S. Dubrovina
Konstantin V. Kiselev
author_facet Olga A. Aleynova
Nikolay N. Nityagovsky
Alexandra S. Dubrovina
Konstantin V. Kiselev
author_sort Olga A. Aleynova
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, the composition profiles of bacterial endophytes in wild-growing Amur grape <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr. grown in the south of the Russian Far East were analyzed using both a cultivation-dependent (sowing bacteria) and a cultivation-independent (next generation sequencing, NGS) approach. Both methods revealed the prevalent endophytes in <i>V. amurensis</i> were represented by <i>Gammaproteobacteria</i>—40.3–75.8%, <i>Alphaproteobacteria</i>—8.6–18.7%, <i>Actinobacteria</i>—9.2–15.4%, and <i>Bacilli</i>—6.1–6.6%. NGS also showed a large proportion of <i>Bacteroidia</i> (12.2%) and a small proportion of other classes (less than 5.7%). In general, NGS revealed a greater variety of classes and genera in the endophytic bacterial community due to a high number of reads (574,207) in comparison with the number of colonies (933) obtained after the cultivation-dependent method. A comparative analysis performed in this study showed that both wild grape <i>V. amurensis</i> from Russia and domesticated cultivars of <i>V. vinifera</i> from Germany and California (USA) exhibit the same basic composition of endophytic bacteria, while the percentages of major taxa and minor taxa showed some differences depending on the plant organ, grape individuals, environmental conditions, and sampling time. Furthermore, the obtained data revealed that lower temperatures and increased precipitation favored the number and diversity of endophytic bacteria in the wild Amur grape. Thus, this study firstly described and analyzed the biodiversity of endophytic bacteria in wild grapevine <i>V. amurensis</i>.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:48:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-30acd23ce93f484ca0e115ad9208fd9c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2223-7747
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:48:34Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Plants
spelling doaj.art-30acd23ce93f484ca0e115ad9208fd9c2023-11-23T09:01:51ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472022-04-01119112810.3390/plants11091128The Biodiversity of Grapevine Bacterial Endophytes of <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr.Olga A. Aleynova0Nikolay N. Nityagovsky1Alexandra S. Dubrovina2Konstantin V. Kiselev3Laboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, RussiaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, RussiaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, RussiaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690022, RussiaIn this paper, the composition profiles of bacterial endophytes in wild-growing Amur grape <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr. grown in the south of the Russian Far East were analyzed using both a cultivation-dependent (sowing bacteria) and a cultivation-independent (next generation sequencing, NGS) approach. Both methods revealed the prevalent endophytes in <i>V. amurensis</i> were represented by <i>Gammaproteobacteria</i>—40.3–75.8%, <i>Alphaproteobacteria</i>—8.6–18.7%, <i>Actinobacteria</i>—9.2–15.4%, and <i>Bacilli</i>—6.1–6.6%. NGS also showed a large proportion of <i>Bacteroidia</i> (12.2%) and a small proportion of other classes (less than 5.7%). In general, NGS revealed a greater variety of classes and genera in the endophytic bacterial community due to a high number of reads (574,207) in comparison with the number of colonies (933) obtained after the cultivation-dependent method. A comparative analysis performed in this study showed that both wild grape <i>V. amurensis</i> from Russia and domesticated cultivars of <i>V. vinifera</i> from Germany and California (USA) exhibit the same basic composition of endophytic bacteria, while the percentages of major taxa and minor taxa showed some differences depending on the plant organ, grape individuals, environmental conditions, and sampling time. Furthermore, the obtained data revealed that lower temperatures and increased precipitation favored the number and diversity of endophytic bacteria in the wild Amur grape. Thus, this study firstly described and analyzed the biodiversity of endophytic bacteria in wild grapevine <i>V. amurensis</i>.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/9/1128bacteriaendophytesgrapemicrobiome<i>Vitis amurensis</i>
spellingShingle Olga A. Aleynova
Nikolay N. Nityagovsky
Alexandra S. Dubrovina
Konstantin V. Kiselev
The Biodiversity of Grapevine Bacterial Endophytes of <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr.
Plants
bacteria
endophytes
grape
microbiome
<i>Vitis amurensis</i>
title The Biodiversity of Grapevine Bacterial Endophytes of <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr.
title_full The Biodiversity of Grapevine Bacterial Endophytes of <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr.
title_fullStr The Biodiversity of Grapevine Bacterial Endophytes of <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr.
title_full_unstemmed The Biodiversity of Grapevine Bacterial Endophytes of <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr.
title_short The Biodiversity of Grapevine Bacterial Endophytes of <i>Vitis amurensis</i> Rupr.
title_sort biodiversity of grapevine bacterial endophytes of i vitis amurensis i rupr
topic bacteria
endophytes
grape
microbiome
<i>Vitis amurensis</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/9/1128
work_keys_str_mv AT olgaaaleynova thebiodiversityofgrapevinebacterialendophytesofivitisamurensisirupr
AT nikolaynnityagovsky thebiodiversityofgrapevinebacterialendophytesofivitisamurensisirupr
AT alexandrasdubrovina thebiodiversityofgrapevinebacterialendophytesofivitisamurensisirupr
AT konstantinvkiselev thebiodiversityofgrapevinebacterialendophytesofivitisamurensisirupr
AT olgaaaleynova biodiversityofgrapevinebacterialendophytesofivitisamurensisirupr
AT nikolaynnityagovsky biodiversityofgrapevinebacterialendophytesofivitisamurensisirupr
AT alexandrasdubrovina biodiversityofgrapevinebacterialendophytesofivitisamurensisirupr
AT konstantinvkiselev biodiversityofgrapevinebacterialendophytesofivitisamurensisirupr