Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: a biomechanical evaluation

Abstract. Objectives:. Implant prominence after ulnar fracture fixation may be mitigated by the use of lower profile plates. The biomechanical strength and stability of 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plates for fixation were compared. Methods:. Two fracture conditions, transverse (N = 10) and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jenna M. Wahbeh, MS, Benjamin V. Kelley, MD, Cyrus Shokoohi, BS, Sang-Hyun Park, PhD, Sai K. Devana, MD, Edward Ebramzadeh, PhD, Sophia N. Sangiorgio, PhD, Devon M. Jeffcoat, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2023-09-01
Series:OTA International
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000278
_version_ 1797732710553223168
author Jenna M. Wahbeh, MS
Benjamin V. Kelley, MD
Cyrus Shokoohi, BS
Sang-Hyun Park, PhD
Sai K. Devana, MD
Edward Ebramzadeh, PhD
Sophia N. Sangiorgio, PhD
Devon M. Jeffcoat, MD
author_facet Jenna M. Wahbeh, MS
Benjamin V. Kelley, MD
Cyrus Shokoohi, BS
Sang-Hyun Park, PhD
Sai K. Devana, MD
Edward Ebramzadeh, PhD
Sophia N. Sangiorgio, PhD
Devon M. Jeffcoat, MD
author_sort Jenna M. Wahbeh, MS
collection DOAJ
description Abstract. Objectives:. Implant prominence after ulnar fracture fixation may be mitigated by the use of lower profile plates. The biomechanical strength and stability of 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plates for fixation were compared. Methods:. Two fracture conditions, transverse (N = 10) and oblique (N = 10), were evaluated in an in vitro study. Half of the specimens for each condition were fixed with 2.7-mm plates and the other half with 3.5-mm plates, all fixed with conventional dynamic compression mechanisms. Specimens were loaded under ±2 Nm of cyclic axial torsion, then under 10 Nm of cyclic cantilever bending, and bending to failure. Interfragmentary motion and strain were analyzed to determine construct stability as a function of fracture pattern and plate size. Results:. Interfragmentary motion was significantly larger in all constructs fixed with 2.7-mm plates, compared with 3.5-mm plates (P < 0.01). The 2.7-mm constructs with transverse fractures had the greatest motion, ranging between 5° and 10° under axial rotation and 5.0–6.0 mm under bending. Motions were the lowest for 3.5-mm constructs with oblique fractures, ranging between 3.2 and 4.2 mm under bending and 2°–3.5° for axial rotation. For oblique fractures, the bending moment at ultimate failure was 31.4 ± 3.6 Nm for the 2.7-mm constructs and 10.0 ± 1.9 Nm for 3.5-mm constructs (P < 0.01). Similarly, for transverse fractures, the bending moment was 17.9 ± 4.0 Nm for the 2.7-mm constructs and 9.7 ± 1.3 Nm for the 3.5-mm constructs (P < 0.01). Conclusions:. Although 3.5-mm plates were more effective at reducing fracture motion, they were consistently associated with refracture at the distal-most screw hole under load to failure. By contrast, 2.7-mm plates plastically deformed despite excessive loads, potentially avoiding a subsequent fracture. Level of Evidence:. Level V.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:18:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-30ae9c56b2a242878d0f8719a45062cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2574-2167
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:18:28Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series OTA International
spelling doaj.art-30ae9c56b2a242878d0f8719a45062cb2023-08-30T06:17:40ZengWolters KluwerOTA International2574-21672023-09-016310.1097/OI9.0000000000000278OI90000000000000278Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: a biomechanical evaluationJenna M. Wahbeh, MS0Benjamin V. Kelley, MD1Cyrus Shokoohi, BS2Sang-Hyun Park, PhD3Sai K. Devana, MD4Edward Ebramzadeh, PhD5Sophia N. Sangiorgio, PhD6Devon M. Jeffcoat, MD7a The J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, Luskin Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Alliance with UCLA, Los Angeles, CAc University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Los Angeles, CAb University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Bioengineering, Los Angeles, CAa The J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, Luskin Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Alliance with UCLA, Los Angeles, CAc University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Los Angeles, CAa The J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, Luskin Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Alliance with UCLA, Los Angeles, CAa The J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, Luskin Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Alliance with UCLA, Los Angeles, CAc University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Los Angeles, CAAbstract. Objectives:. Implant prominence after ulnar fracture fixation may be mitigated by the use of lower profile plates. The biomechanical strength and stability of 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plates for fixation were compared. Methods:. Two fracture conditions, transverse (N = 10) and oblique (N = 10), were evaluated in an in vitro study. Half of the specimens for each condition were fixed with 2.7-mm plates and the other half with 3.5-mm plates, all fixed with conventional dynamic compression mechanisms. Specimens were loaded under ±2 Nm of cyclic axial torsion, then under 10 Nm of cyclic cantilever bending, and bending to failure. Interfragmentary motion and strain were analyzed to determine construct stability as a function of fracture pattern and plate size. Results:. Interfragmentary motion was significantly larger in all constructs fixed with 2.7-mm plates, compared with 3.5-mm plates (P < 0.01). The 2.7-mm constructs with transverse fractures had the greatest motion, ranging between 5° and 10° under axial rotation and 5.0–6.0 mm under bending. Motions were the lowest for 3.5-mm constructs with oblique fractures, ranging between 3.2 and 4.2 mm under bending and 2°–3.5° for axial rotation. For oblique fractures, the bending moment at ultimate failure was 31.4 ± 3.6 Nm for the 2.7-mm constructs and 10.0 ± 1.9 Nm for 3.5-mm constructs (P < 0.01). Similarly, for transverse fractures, the bending moment was 17.9 ± 4.0 Nm for the 2.7-mm constructs and 9.7 ± 1.3 Nm for the 3.5-mm constructs (P < 0.01). Conclusions:. Although 3.5-mm plates were more effective at reducing fracture motion, they were consistently associated with refracture at the distal-most screw hole under load to failure. By contrast, 2.7-mm plates plastically deformed despite excessive loads, potentially avoiding a subsequent fracture. Level of Evidence:. Level V.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000278
spellingShingle Jenna M. Wahbeh, MS
Benjamin V. Kelley, MD
Cyrus Shokoohi, BS
Sang-Hyun Park, PhD
Sai K. Devana, MD
Edward Ebramzadeh, PhD
Sophia N. Sangiorgio, PhD
Devon M. Jeffcoat, MD
Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: a biomechanical evaluation
OTA International
title Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: a biomechanical evaluation
title_full Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: a biomechanical evaluation
title_fullStr Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: a biomechanical evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: a biomechanical evaluation
title_short Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: a biomechanical evaluation
title_sort comparison of a 2 7 mm and 3 5 mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures a biomechanical evaluation
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000278
work_keys_str_mv AT jennamwahbehms comparisonofa27mmand35mmlockingcompressionplateforulnarfracturesabiomechanicalevaluation
AT benjaminvkelleymd comparisonofa27mmand35mmlockingcompressionplateforulnarfracturesabiomechanicalevaluation
AT cyrusshokoohibs comparisonofa27mmand35mmlockingcompressionplateforulnarfracturesabiomechanicalevaluation
AT sanghyunparkphd comparisonofa27mmand35mmlockingcompressionplateforulnarfracturesabiomechanicalevaluation
AT saikdevanamd comparisonofa27mmand35mmlockingcompressionplateforulnarfracturesabiomechanicalevaluation
AT edwardebramzadehphd comparisonofa27mmand35mmlockingcompressionplateforulnarfracturesabiomechanicalevaluation
AT sophiansangiorgiophd comparisonofa27mmand35mmlockingcompressionplateforulnarfracturesabiomechanicalevaluation
AT devonmjeffcoatmd comparisonofa27mmand35mmlockingcompressionplateforulnarfracturesabiomechanicalevaluation