Progressive cooling techniques for photovoltaic module efficiency and reliability: Comparative evaluation and optimization

The temperature of photovoltaic modules during operation is one of the most critical criteria for determining both efficiency and reliability. Alternative PV module cooling techniques have been offered as a means of lowering module temperature, lowering deterioration rates, and enhancing efficiency....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matheus Rabelo, Hasnain Yousuf, Jaeun Kim, Vinh-Ai Dao, Duy Phong Pham, Junsin Yi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-11-01
Series:Energy Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722012082
_version_ 1797901924009246720
author Matheus Rabelo
Hasnain Yousuf
Jaeun Kim
Vinh-Ai Dao
Duy Phong Pham
Junsin Yi
author_facet Matheus Rabelo
Hasnain Yousuf
Jaeun Kim
Vinh-Ai Dao
Duy Phong Pham
Junsin Yi
author_sort Matheus Rabelo
collection DOAJ
description The temperature of photovoltaic modules during operation is one of the most critical criteria for determining both efficiency and reliability. Alternative PV module cooling techniques have been offered as a means of lowering module temperature, lowering deterioration rates, and enhancing efficiency. In this work, progressive cooling methods including water jacket, phase change material (PCM), and heatsink are thoroughly analyzed using the finite element model. In addition, considerable improvements in the PV module efficiency and reliability are accomplished by introducing new designs for the water jacket. The results show that a water jacket with an aluminum container design performs best when the mass flow rate is 8 kg/min, resulting in a 6.8% power gain, whereas a water jacket with an aluminum pipe design performs best when the pipe diameter is 2.5 cm and the mass flow rate is 2 kg/min, resulting in a 5.2% power gain. In natural convection conditions, the PCM paraffin wax RT-42 and water jacket implementations can reach a 10 °C and 12 °C drop, respectively, whilst the heatsink can only achieve a 4 °C drop. An empirical model is also used to predict and quantify the impact of each cooling method on the durability of PV modules. Water jackets, PCM, and heatsinks all increase solder fatigue life by 154, 103, and 27%, respectively. The module lifetime owing to hydrolysis mitigation is increased by 68, 56, and 18%, respectively, with water jackets, PCM, and heatsink, while the module lifetime due to photodegradation mitigation is increased by 37, 31, and 11%, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:09:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-30bb1ae4ec1e41c2a31c646d16fb5f4d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-4847
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:09:40Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Energy Reports
spelling doaj.art-30bb1ae4ec1e41c2a31c646d16fb5f4d2023-02-21T05:12:12ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472022-11-01885348545Progressive cooling techniques for photovoltaic module efficiency and reliability: Comparative evaluation and optimizationMatheus Rabelo0Hasnain Yousuf1Jaeun Kim2Vinh-Ai Dao3Duy Phong Pham4Junsin Yi5Interdisciplinary Program in Photovoltaic System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of KoreaInterdisciplinary Program in Photovoltaic System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of KoreaFuture Materials & Devices Lab., Institute of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Duy Tan University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Viet Nam; Faculty of Electrical-Electronic Engineering, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Viet Nam; Corresponding authors.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea; Corresponding authors.College of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea; Corresponding authors.The temperature of photovoltaic modules during operation is one of the most critical criteria for determining both efficiency and reliability. Alternative PV module cooling techniques have been offered as a means of lowering module temperature, lowering deterioration rates, and enhancing efficiency. In this work, progressive cooling methods including water jacket, phase change material (PCM), and heatsink are thoroughly analyzed using the finite element model. In addition, considerable improvements in the PV module efficiency and reliability are accomplished by introducing new designs for the water jacket. The results show that a water jacket with an aluminum container design performs best when the mass flow rate is 8 kg/min, resulting in a 6.8% power gain, whereas a water jacket with an aluminum pipe design performs best when the pipe diameter is 2.5 cm and the mass flow rate is 2 kg/min, resulting in a 5.2% power gain. In natural convection conditions, the PCM paraffin wax RT-42 and water jacket implementations can reach a 10 °C and 12 °C drop, respectively, whilst the heatsink can only achieve a 4 °C drop. An empirical model is also used to predict and quantify the impact of each cooling method on the durability of PV modules. Water jackets, PCM, and heatsinks all increase solder fatigue life by 154, 103, and 27%, respectively. The module lifetime owing to hydrolysis mitigation is increased by 68, 56, and 18%, respectively, with water jackets, PCM, and heatsink, while the module lifetime due to photodegradation mitigation is increased by 37, 31, and 11%, respectively.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722012082Cooling methodsModule temperaturePCMWater jacketHeatsinkModule reliability
spellingShingle Matheus Rabelo
Hasnain Yousuf
Jaeun Kim
Vinh-Ai Dao
Duy Phong Pham
Junsin Yi
Progressive cooling techniques for photovoltaic module efficiency and reliability: Comparative evaluation and optimization
Energy Reports
Cooling methods
Module temperature
PCM
Water jacket
Heatsink
Module reliability
title Progressive cooling techniques for photovoltaic module efficiency and reliability: Comparative evaluation and optimization
title_full Progressive cooling techniques for photovoltaic module efficiency and reliability: Comparative evaluation and optimization
title_fullStr Progressive cooling techniques for photovoltaic module efficiency and reliability: Comparative evaluation and optimization
title_full_unstemmed Progressive cooling techniques for photovoltaic module efficiency and reliability: Comparative evaluation and optimization
title_short Progressive cooling techniques for photovoltaic module efficiency and reliability: Comparative evaluation and optimization
title_sort progressive cooling techniques for photovoltaic module efficiency and reliability comparative evaluation and optimization
topic Cooling methods
Module temperature
PCM
Water jacket
Heatsink
Module reliability
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722012082
work_keys_str_mv AT matheusrabelo progressivecoolingtechniquesforphotovoltaicmoduleefficiencyandreliabilitycomparativeevaluationandoptimization
AT hasnainyousuf progressivecoolingtechniquesforphotovoltaicmoduleefficiencyandreliabilitycomparativeevaluationandoptimization
AT jaeunkim progressivecoolingtechniquesforphotovoltaicmoduleefficiencyandreliabilitycomparativeevaluationandoptimization
AT vinhaidao progressivecoolingtechniquesforphotovoltaicmoduleefficiencyandreliabilitycomparativeevaluationandoptimization
AT duyphongpham progressivecoolingtechniquesforphotovoltaicmoduleefficiencyandreliabilitycomparativeevaluationandoptimization
AT junsinyi progressivecoolingtechniquesforphotovoltaicmoduleefficiencyandreliabilitycomparativeevaluationandoptimization