Influence of the 3D architecture and surface roughness of SiOC anodes on bioelectrochemical system performance: a comparative study of freeze-cast, 3D-printed, and tape-cast materials with uniform composition

Abstract 3D-printed anodes for bioelectrochemical systems are increasingly being reported. However, comparisons between 3D-printed anodes and their non-3D-printed counterparts with the same material composition are still lacking. In addition, surface roughness parameters that could be correlated wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedro Henrique da Rosa Braun, Anne Kuchenbuch, Bruno Toselli, Kurosch Rezwan, Falk Harnisch, Michaela Wilhelm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-02-01
Series:Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40243-023-00253-4
_version_ 1797209197115342848
author Pedro Henrique da Rosa Braun
Anne Kuchenbuch
Bruno Toselli
Kurosch Rezwan
Falk Harnisch
Michaela Wilhelm
author_facet Pedro Henrique da Rosa Braun
Anne Kuchenbuch
Bruno Toselli
Kurosch Rezwan
Falk Harnisch
Michaela Wilhelm
author_sort Pedro Henrique da Rosa Braun
collection DOAJ
description Abstract 3D-printed anodes for bioelectrochemical systems are increasingly being reported. However, comparisons between 3D-printed anodes and their non-3D-printed counterparts with the same material composition are still lacking. In addition, surface roughness parameters that could be correlated with bioelectrochemical performance are rarely determined. To fill these gaps, slurries with identical composition but different mass fractions were processed into SiOC anodes by tape-casting, freeze-casting, or direct-ink writing. The current generation was investigated using electroactive biofilms enriched with Geobacter spp. Freeze-cast anodes showed more surface pores and the highest surface kurtosis of 5.7 ± 0.5, whereas tape-cast and 3D-printed anodes showed a closed surface porosity. 3D-printing was only possible using slurries 85 wt% of mass fraction. The surface pores of the freeze-cast anodes improved bacterial adhesion and resulted in a high initial (first cycle) maximum current density per geometric surface area of 9.2 ± 2.1 A m−2. The larger surface area of the 3D-printed anodes prevented pore clogging and produced the highest current density per geometric surface area of 12.0 ± 1.2 A m−2. The current density values of all anodes are similar when the current density is normalized over the entire geometric surface as determined by CT-scans. This study highlights the role of geometric surface area in normalizing current generation and the need to use more surface roughness parameters to correlate anode properties, bacterial adhesion, and current generation.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:50:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-30cd7568bdb140e2ba3afe0d871ea974
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2194-1459
2194-1467
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:50:52Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy
spelling doaj.art-30cd7568bdb140e2ba3afe0d871ea9742024-04-14T11:23:07ZengSpringerOpenMaterials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy2194-14592194-14672024-02-01131819610.1007/s40243-023-00253-4Influence of the 3D architecture and surface roughness of SiOC anodes on bioelectrochemical system performance: a comparative study of freeze-cast, 3D-printed, and tape-cast materials with uniform compositionPedro Henrique da Rosa Braun0Anne Kuchenbuch1Bruno Toselli2Kurosch Rezwan3Falk Harnisch4Michaela Wilhelm5Advanced Ceramics, University of BremenDepartment of Microbial Biotechnology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research GmbH-UFZAdvanced Ceramics, University of BremenAdvanced Ceramics, University of BremenDepartment of Microbial Biotechnology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research GmbH-UFZAdvanced Ceramics, University of BremenAbstract 3D-printed anodes for bioelectrochemical systems are increasingly being reported. However, comparisons between 3D-printed anodes and their non-3D-printed counterparts with the same material composition are still lacking. In addition, surface roughness parameters that could be correlated with bioelectrochemical performance are rarely determined. To fill these gaps, slurries with identical composition but different mass fractions were processed into SiOC anodes by tape-casting, freeze-casting, or direct-ink writing. The current generation was investigated using electroactive biofilms enriched with Geobacter spp. Freeze-cast anodes showed more surface pores and the highest surface kurtosis of 5.7 ± 0.5, whereas tape-cast and 3D-printed anodes showed a closed surface porosity. 3D-printing was only possible using slurries 85 wt% of mass fraction. The surface pores of the freeze-cast anodes improved bacterial adhesion and resulted in a high initial (first cycle) maximum current density per geometric surface area of 9.2 ± 2.1 A m−2. The larger surface area of the 3D-printed anodes prevented pore clogging and produced the highest current density per geometric surface area of 12.0 ± 1.2 A m−2. The current density values of all anodes are similar when the current density is normalized over the entire geometric surface as determined by CT-scans. This study highlights the role of geometric surface area in normalizing current generation and the need to use more surface roughness parameters to correlate anode properties, bacterial adhesion, and current generation.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40243-023-00253-4Microbial electrochemical technologiesPolymer-derived ceramics3D printingDirect-ink writingFreeze-castingGeobacter
spellingShingle Pedro Henrique da Rosa Braun
Anne Kuchenbuch
Bruno Toselli
Kurosch Rezwan
Falk Harnisch
Michaela Wilhelm
Influence of the 3D architecture and surface roughness of SiOC anodes on bioelectrochemical system performance: a comparative study of freeze-cast, 3D-printed, and tape-cast materials with uniform composition
Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Microbial electrochemical technologies
Polymer-derived ceramics
3D printing
Direct-ink writing
Freeze-casting
Geobacter
title Influence of the 3D architecture and surface roughness of SiOC anodes on bioelectrochemical system performance: a comparative study of freeze-cast, 3D-printed, and tape-cast materials with uniform composition
title_full Influence of the 3D architecture and surface roughness of SiOC anodes on bioelectrochemical system performance: a comparative study of freeze-cast, 3D-printed, and tape-cast materials with uniform composition
title_fullStr Influence of the 3D architecture and surface roughness of SiOC anodes on bioelectrochemical system performance: a comparative study of freeze-cast, 3D-printed, and tape-cast materials with uniform composition
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the 3D architecture and surface roughness of SiOC anodes on bioelectrochemical system performance: a comparative study of freeze-cast, 3D-printed, and tape-cast materials with uniform composition
title_short Influence of the 3D architecture and surface roughness of SiOC anodes on bioelectrochemical system performance: a comparative study of freeze-cast, 3D-printed, and tape-cast materials with uniform composition
title_sort influence of the 3d architecture and surface roughness of sioc anodes on bioelectrochemical system performance a comparative study of freeze cast 3d printed and tape cast materials with uniform composition
topic Microbial electrochemical technologies
Polymer-derived ceramics
3D printing
Direct-ink writing
Freeze-casting
Geobacter
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40243-023-00253-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrohenriquedarosabraun influenceofthe3darchitectureandsurfaceroughnessofsiocanodesonbioelectrochemicalsystemperformanceacomparativestudyoffreezecast3dprintedandtapecastmaterialswithuniformcomposition
AT annekuchenbuch influenceofthe3darchitectureandsurfaceroughnessofsiocanodesonbioelectrochemicalsystemperformanceacomparativestudyoffreezecast3dprintedandtapecastmaterialswithuniformcomposition
AT brunotoselli influenceofthe3darchitectureandsurfaceroughnessofsiocanodesonbioelectrochemicalsystemperformanceacomparativestudyoffreezecast3dprintedandtapecastmaterialswithuniformcomposition
AT kuroschrezwan influenceofthe3darchitectureandsurfaceroughnessofsiocanodesonbioelectrochemicalsystemperformanceacomparativestudyoffreezecast3dprintedandtapecastmaterialswithuniformcomposition
AT falkharnisch influenceofthe3darchitectureandsurfaceroughnessofsiocanodesonbioelectrochemicalsystemperformanceacomparativestudyoffreezecast3dprintedandtapecastmaterialswithuniformcomposition
AT michaelawilhelm influenceofthe3darchitectureandsurfaceroughnessofsiocanodesonbioelectrochemicalsystemperformanceacomparativestudyoffreezecast3dprintedandtapecastmaterialswithuniformcomposition