Beyond Engagement Exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens’ Technology Forum from the Bottom-Up

Exercises intended to engage laypeople in deliberations about emerging scientific and technological issues have become very popular in recent decades. These exercises are typically organized by political or intellectual elites, and often assessed in a top-down fashion as well. This paper disrupts th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason Delborne, Maria Powell, Mathilde Colin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Westminster Press 2011-10-01
Series:Journal of Deliberative Democracy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/387/
_version_ 1811309416506458112
author Jason Delborne
Maria Powell
Mathilde Colin
author_facet Jason Delborne
Maria Powell
Mathilde Colin
author_sort Jason Delborne
collection DOAJ
description Exercises intended to engage laypeople in deliberations about emerging scientific and technological issues have become very popular in recent decades. These exercises are typically organized by political or intellectual elites, and often assessed in a top-down fashion as well. This paper disrupts that pattern by using a mix of complementary qualitative approaches to explore the experiences of citizen participants in a large exercise on emerging technologies, the 2008 U.S. National Citizens Technology Forum (NCTF), which included both face-to-face and online deliberations. Research questions explore participants’ perspectives on 1) the quality of the deliberations, 2) the potential for the exercise to have impacts, and 3) the degree of empowerment they experienced. While most participants had positive experiences in the exercise, and did not feel that anyone dominated deliberations, at times tensions and conflicts simmered under the surface. Further, the majority of the participants were highly critical of what they felt were chaotic online interactions that failed to engage with some of their key questions. Though many mentioned gaining some personal efficacy, most categorized the exercise as a research project and therefore did not feel it would have many broader societal or political impacts. Finally, participants’ reflections on their experiences in the exercise revealed interesting insights that went beyond the focal research questions—such as their awareness of the top-down power dynamics in the exercise—and how they actively negotiated these dynamics in ways that shaped the quality of deliberation, their sense of empowerment, and assessments of the exercise’s potential impacts.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:41:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-30ed43fcf7254f15b74099045e08c3fa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2634-0488
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:41:44Z
publishDate 2011-10-01
publisher University of Westminster Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Deliberative Democracy
spelling doaj.art-30ed43fcf7254f15b74099045e08c3fa2022-12-22T02:51:53ZengUniversity of Westminster PressJournal of Deliberative Democracy2634-04882011-10-017110.16997/jdd.115Beyond Engagement Exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens’ Technology Forum from the Bottom-UpJason Delborne0Maria Powell1Mathilde Colin2Colorado School of MinesMidwest Environmental Justice Organization, Nanotechnology Citizen Engagement OrganizationAvicennExercises intended to engage laypeople in deliberations about emerging scientific and technological issues have become very popular in recent decades. These exercises are typically organized by political or intellectual elites, and often assessed in a top-down fashion as well. This paper disrupts that pattern by using a mix of complementary qualitative approaches to explore the experiences of citizen participants in a large exercise on emerging technologies, the 2008 U.S. National Citizens Technology Forum (NCTF), which included both face-to-face and online deliberations. Research questions explore participants’ perspectives on 1) the quality of the deliberations, 2) the potential for the exercise to have impacts, and 3) the degree of empowerment they experienced. While most participants had positive experiences in the exercise, and did not feel that anyone dominated deliberations, at times tensions and conflicts simmered under the surface. Further, the majority of the participants were highly critical of what they felt were chaotic online interactions that failed to engage with some of their key questions. Though many mentioned gaining some personal efficacy, most categorized the exercise as a research project and therefore did not feel it would have many broader societal or political impacts. Finally, participants’ reflections on their experiences in the exercise revealed interesting insights that went beyond the focal research questions—such as their awareness of the top-down power dynamics in the exercise—and how they actively negotiated these dynamics in ways that shaped the quality of deliberation, their sense of empowerment, and assessments of the exercise’s potential impacts.https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/387/human enhancementnanotechnologyconsensus conferencedemocracydeliberationcitizen engagement
spellingShingle Jason Delborne
Maria Powell
Mathilde Colin
Beyond Engagement Exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens’ Technology Forum from the Bottom-Up
Journal of Deliberative Democracy
human enhancement
nanotechnology
consensus conference
democracy
deliberation
citizen engagement
title Beyond Engagement Exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens’ Technology Forum from the Bottom-Up
title_full Beyond Engagement Exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens’ Technology Forum from the Bottom-Up
title_fullStr Beyond Engagement Exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens’ Technology Forum from the Bottom-Up
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Engagement Exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens’ Technology Forum from the Bottom-Up
title_short Beyond Engagement Exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens’ Technology Forum from the Bottom-Up
title_sort beyond engagement exercises exploring the u s national citizens technology forum from the bottom up
topic human enhancement
nanotechnology
consensus conference
democracy
deliberation
citizen engagement
url https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/387/
work_keys_str_mv AT jasondelborne beyondengagementexercisesexploringtheusnationalcitizenstechnologyforumfromthebottomup
AT mariapowell beyondengagementexercisesexploringtheusnationalcitizenstechnologyforumfromthebottomup
AT mathildecolin beyondengagementexercisesexploringtheusnationalcitizenstechnologyforumfromthebottomup