Mari, Merya, Muroma — History of the Ethnonyms and Reconstruction of the Substrate Toponymy Languages

The old hypothesis on the relatedness of Merya languages (today we can speak about a group of languages or dialects reconstructed on the basis of substrate toponymy of Central Russia: Merya of Rostov, Merya of Kostroma, and Merya of Murom also known as “Lower Klyazma” Merya) with the Mari (Cheremis)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vladimir V. Napolskikh, Alexander V. Savelyev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta 2023-12-01
Series:Вопросы ономастики
Subjects:
Online Access:http://onomastics.ru/sites/default/files/doi/10.15826/vopr_onom.2023.20.3.029.pdf
_version_ 1797398195104382976
author Vladimir V. Napolskikh
Alexander V. Savelyev
author_facet Vladimir V. Napolskikh
Alexander V. Savelyev
author_sort Vladimir V. Napolskikh
collection DOAJ
description The old hypothesis on the relatedness of Merya languages (today we can speak about a group of languages or dialects reconstructed on the basis of substrate toponymy of Central Russia: Merya of Rostov, Merya of Kostroma, and Merya of Murom also known as “Lower Klyazma” Merya) with the Mari (Cheremis) language has been reliably proven in the works of A. K. Matveyev, O. V. Smirnov and others. The authors contribute to the ongoing discussion in this area and argue that the new reconstruction of Proto-Mari vocalism based on the history of Mari-Turkic contacts undoubtedly supports this hypothesis. The article suggests a version of the Stammbaum of Finno-Permian languages, including the Mari-Merya group and some other extinct Finno-Permian languages, reconstructed on the basis of substrate toponymic data. However, since the results of the analysis of substrate toponymy are naturally debatable to a certain extent, the authors propose to turn to the analysis of ethnonymy. The long-noted (by M. A. Castrén) similarity of the ethnonyms Mari, Merya, and Muroma is considered, suggesting them to be self-names of the respective ethnic groups. The reconstruction of the Mari historical vocalism (as well as features of the vocalism of the Merya and Muromian languages that can be extracted from toponymic materials) delivers the proto-forms Mari *märə, Merya *märə, Muromian *mürə, going back to the proto-form *märə. The latter is proposed to regard (as it is now common in the Finno-Ugric studies) as some reflex of Aryan *marya- ‘young man, warrior, member of youth war community’ (the authors are going to devote a special article to the problem of the Aryan source of this ethnonym). The reconstruction of the common Mari–Meryan–Muromian auto-ethnonym *märə is not only a strong argument for the relatedness of these languages, but also indicates to close relations between the respective ethnic groups and their common origin.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:22:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-31004efbcccb4048b17b6c73be753fd5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1994-2400
1994-2451
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:22:18Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Izdatelstvo Uralskogo Universiteta
record_format Article
series Вопросы ономастики
spelling doaj.art-31004efbcccb4048b17b6c73be753fd52023-12-10T10:32:36ZrusIzdatelstvo Uralskogo UniversitetaВопросы ономастики1994-24001994-24512023-12-0120393010.15826/vopr_onom.2023.20.3.029Mari, Merya, Muroma — History of the Ethnonyms and Reconstruction of the Substrate Toponymy LanguagesVladimir V. Napolskikh0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1549-9639Alexander V. Savelyev1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-2057Ural Federal University, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian FederationUral Federal University, Institute of Linguistics of the RAS, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsThe old hypothesis on the relatedness of Merya languages (today we can speak about a group of languages or dialects reconstructed on the basis of substrate toponymy of Central Russia: Merya of Rostov, Merya of Kostroma, and Merya of Murom also known as “Lower Klyazma” Merya) with the Mari (Cheremis) language has been reliably proven in the works of A. K. Matveyev, O. V. Smirnov and others. The authors contribute to the ongoing discussion in this area and argue that the new reconstruction of Proto-Mari vocalism based on the history of Mari-Turkic contacts undoubtedly supports this hypothesis. The article suggests a version of the Stammbaum of Finno-Permian languages, including the Mari-Merya group and some other extinct Finno-Permian languages, reconstructed on the basis of substrate toponymic data. However, since the results of the analysis of substrate toponymy are naturally debatable to a certain extent, the authors propose to turn to the analysis of ethnonymy. The long-noted (by M. A. Castrén) similarity of the ethnonyms Mari, Merya, and Muroma is considered, suggesting them to be self-names of the respective ethnic groups. The reconstruction of the Mari historical vocalism (as well as features of the vocalism of the Merya and Muromian languages that can be extracted from toponymic materials) delivers the proto-forms Mari *märə, Merya *märə, Muromian *mürə, going back to the proto-form *märə. The latter is proposed to regard (as it is now common in the Finno-Ugric studies) as some reflex of Aryan *marya- ‘young man, warrior, member of youth war community’ (the authors are going to devote a special article to the problem of the Aryan source of this ethnonym). The reconstruction of the common Mari–Meryan–Muromian auto-ethnonym *märə is not only a strong argument for the relatedness of these languages, but also indicates to close relations between the respective ethnic groups and their common origin.http://onomastics.ru/sites/default/files/doi/10.15826/vopr_onom.2023.20.3.029.pdfethnonymyfinno-permian languagesmarimari (cheremis) languagemeryamerya languagemuromasubstrate toponymy
spellingShingle Vladimir V. Napolskikh
Alexander V. Savelyev
Mari, Merya, Muroma — History of the Ethnonyms and Reconstruction of the Substrate Toponymy Languages
Вопросы ономастики
ethnonymy
finno-permian languages
mari
mari (cheremis) language
merya
merya language
muroma
substrate toponymy
title Mari, Merya, Muroma — History of the Ethnonyms and Reconstruction of the Substrate Toponymy Languages
title_full Mari, Merya, Muroma — History of the Ethnonyms and Reconstruction of the Substrate Toponymy Languages
title_fullStr Mari, Merya, Muroma — History of the Ethnonyms and Reconstruction of the Substrate Toponymy Languages
title_full_unstemmed Mari, Merya, Muroma — History of the Ethnonyms and Reconstruction of the Substrate Toponymy Languages
title_short Mari, Merya, Muroma — History of the Ethnonyms and Reconstruction of the Substrate Toponymy Languages
title_sort mari merya muroma history of the ethnonyms and reconstruction of the substrate toponymy languages
topic ethnonymy
finno-permian languages
mari
mari (cheremis) language
merya
merya language
muroma
substrate toponymy
url http://onomastics.ru/sites/default/files/doi/10.15826/vopr_onom.2023.20.3.029.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vladimirvnapolskikh marimeryamuromahistoryoftheethnonymsandreconstructionofthesubstratetoponymylanguages
AT alexandervsavelyev marimeryamuromahistoryoftheethnonymsandreconstructionofthesubstratetoponymylanguages