CEPEJ Gudelines for Mediation Resolving Administrative Disputes – A Comparison between Council of Europe States and Ukrainian Perspectives

The status of Ukraine as a candidate country for the European Union membership reinforces the need for comparative analysis between Ukrainian regulations and law of other EU Member States as well as European regulations. One of the fields of comparative law is a development of mediation for disputes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alina Serhieieva
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Published: Lodz University Press 2023-12-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Iuridica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/Iuridica/article/view/17684
_version_ 1797338601813442560
author Alina Serhieieva
author_facet Alina Serhieieva
author_sort Alina Serhieieva
collection DOAJ
description The status of Ukraine as a candidate country for the European Union membership reinforces the need for comparative analysis between Ukrainian regulations and law of other EU Member States as well as European regulations. One of the fields of comparative law is a development of mediation for disputes covered by administrative law. It has already been a subject of interest and promotion to both – The EU and the Council of Europe, since European standards of democracy provide for state cooperate with citizens/individuals. The aim of this article is, to examine the main provisions, recommendations and best practices of the CoE member states, and to analyse the current practice and existing gaps in Ukraine in order to develop a proposal for effective implementation in the light of the most recent CEPEJ Guidelines promoting mediation to resolve administrative disputes. A comparative overview of this type of mediation regulations may be considered as novum. As for methodology, the paper is dominated by the logical-linguistic and comparative method. So far – though Ukrainian legal system is quite compatibile with the examined CEPEJ gudelines and provide for inter-branch solutions – the development of administrative and court-administrative mediation is quite resilient and there is still much to be done not solely with legal regulations, but also „mediation culture” in such field.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:33:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3111ec29c397429bb8ffd747c87fcebd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0208-6069
2450-2782
language Polish
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:33:39Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Lodz University Press
record_format Article
series Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Iuridica
spelling doaj.art-3111ec29c397429bb8ffd747c87fcebd2024-01-30T16:39:43ZpolLodz University PressActa Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Iuridica0208-60692450-27822023-12-0110518519410.18778/0208-6069.105.1117433CEPEJ Gudelines for Mediation Resolving Administrative Disputes – A Comparison between Council of Europe States and Ukrainian PerspectivesAlina Serhieieva0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-4062Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University of Kharkiv, Mykolas Romeris University of VilniusThe status of Ukraine as a candidate country for the European Union membership reinforces the need for comparative analysis between Ukrainian regulations and law of other EU Member States as well as European regulations. One of the fields of comparative law is a development of mediation for disputes covered by administrative law. It has already been a subject of interest and promotion to both – The EU and the Council of Europe, since European standards of democracy provide for state cooperate with citizens/individuals. The aim of this article is, to examine the main provisions, recommendations and best practices of the CoE member states, and to analyse the current practice and existing gaps in Ukraine in order to develop a proposal for effective implementation in the light of the most recent CEPEJ Guidelines promoting mediation to resolve administrative disputes. A comparative overview of this type of mediation regulations may be considered as novum. As for methodology, the paper is dominated by the logical-linguistic and comparative method. So far – though Ukrainian legal system is quite compatibile with the examined CEPEJ gudelines and provide for inter-branch solutions – the development of administrative and court-administrative mediation is quite resilient and there is still much to be done not solely with legal regulations, but also „mediation culture” in such field.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/Iuridica/article/view/17684ukrainian lawmediation on administrative disputescepej guidelineseuropean law
spellingShingle Alina Serhieieva
CEPEJ Gudelines for Mediation Resolving Administrative Disputes – A Comparison between Council of Europe States and Ukrainian Perspectives
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Iuridica
ukrainian law
mediation on administrative disputes
cepej guidelines
european law
title CEPEJ Gudelines for Mediation Resolving Administrative Disputes – A Comparison between Council of Europe States and Ukrainian Perspectives
title_full CEPEJ Gudelines for Mediation Resolving Administrative Disputes – A Comparison between Council of Europe States and Ukrainian Perspectives
title_fullStr CEPEJ Gudelines for Mediation Resolving Administrative Disputes – A Comparison between Council of Europe States and Ukrainian Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed CEPEJ Gudelines for Mediation Resolving Administrative Disputes – A Comparison between Council of Europe States and Ukrainian Perspectives
title_short CEPEJ Gudelines for Mediation Resolving Administrative Disputes – A Comparison between Council of Europe States and Ukrainian Perspectives
title_sort cepej gudelines for mediation resolving administrative disputes a comparison between council of europe states and ukrainian perspectives
topic ukrainian law
mediation on administrative disputes
cepej guidelines
european law
url https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/Iuridica/article/view/17684
work_keys_str_mv AT alinaserhieieva cepejgudelinesformediationresolvingadministrativedisputesacomparisonbetweencouncilofeuropestatesandukrainianperspectives