Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography
Abstract Background Perianal fistula is a considered as chronic recurrent inflammatory condition that requires proper surgical treatment and may require repeated intervention. Therefore, adequate pre-operative radiological diagnosis plays a critical role. In this study, we aimed at comparing the rol...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2022-08-01
|
Series: | The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00869-y |
_version_ | 1798032057060818944 |
---|---|
author | Alaa Sayed Hatem Mohamed Said El-azizi Mohamed Yehia Ahmed El-barmelgi Heba Azzam |
author_facet | Alaa Sayed Hatem Mohamed Said El-azizi Mohamed Yehia Ahmed El-barmelgi Heba Azzam |
author_sort | Alaa Sayed |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Perianal fistula is a considered as chronic recurrent inflammatory condition that requires proper surgical treatment and may require repeated intervention. Therefore, adequate pre-operative radiological diagnosis plays a critical role. In this study, we aimed at comparing the role of endoanal ultrasonography with MRI fistulography in evaluating the primary fistula's tract, internal opening, secondary extensions, and complications of the perianal fistula. Results The study was carried over 108 males (90%) and 12 females (10%) presenting with clinically diagnosed perianal fistula. Ultrasound was found superior to MRI in the localization of the internal opening with estimated K value (0.44), P value (0.001). Regarding the type of fistula, ultrasound was found in agreement with MRI in 112 cases (93.3%) with estimated K value of about (0.7). Ultrasound was found equally effective as MRI in the detection of complication with estimated agreement K value of about 1. Regarding assessment of the secondary extensions, the agreement between the two modalities was about 50% with estimated k value of about 0.65. Conversely, MRI was found superior to ultrasound in the characterization of the fibrotic tracts. Conclusions Both EAUS and MRI have a crucial role in the evaluation and detection of perianal fistulas. EAUS was preferable to MRI in the localization of the internal opening; ,conversely, in the evaluation of extra-sphincteric fistulas and fibrotic tracts characterization MRI was preferable to EAUS. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:07:49Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-311f06814ee6414f87c1952184496722 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2090-4762 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:07:49Z |
publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-311f06814ee6414f87c19521844967222022-12-22T04:05:16ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine2090-47622022-08-0153111110.1186/s43055-022-00869-yRole of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulographyAlaa Sayed0Hatem Mohamed Said El-azizi1Mohamed Yehia Ahmed El-barmelgi2Heba Azzam3Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityKasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityKasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityKasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityAbstract Background Perianal fistula is a considered as chronic recurrent inflammatory condition that requires proper surgical treatment and may require repeated intervention. Therefore, adequate pre-operative radiological diagnosis plays a critical role. In this study, we aimed at comparing the role of endoanal ultrasonography with MRI fistulography in evaluating the primary fistula's tract, internal opening, secondary extensions, and complications of the perianal fistula. Results The study was carried over 108 males (90%) and 12 females (10%) presenting with clinically diagnosed perianal fistula. Ultrasound was found superior to MRI in the localization of the internal opening with estimated K value (0.44), P value (0.001). Regarding the type of fistula, ultrasound was found in agreement with MRI in 112 cases (93.3%) with estimated K value of about (0.7). Ultrasound was found equally effective as MRI in the detection of complication with estimated agreement K value of about 1. Regarding assessment of the secondary extensions, the agreement between the two modalities was about 50% with estimated k value of about 0.65. Conversely, MRI was found superior to ultrasound in the characterization of the fibrotic tracts. Conclusions Both EAUS and MRI have a crucial role in the evaluation and detection of perianal fistulas. EAUS was preferable to MRI in the localization of the internal opening; ,conversely, in the evaluation of extra-sphincteric fistulas and fibrotic tracts characterization MRI was preferable to EAUS.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00869-yEndoanal ultrasoundPerianal fistulaMRI fistulography |
spellingShingle | Alaa Sayed Hatem Mohamed Said El-azizi Mohamed Yehia Ahmed El-barmelgi Heba Azzam Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Endoanal ultrasound Perianal fistula MRI fistulography |
title | Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography |
title_full | Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography |
title_fullStr | Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography |
title_short | Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography |
title_sort | role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with mri fistulography |
topic | Endoanal ultrasound Perianal fistula MRI fistulography |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00869-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alaasayed roleofendoanalultrasoundintheassessmentofperianalfistulaincorrelationwithmrifistulography AT hatemmohamedsaidelazizi roleofendoanalultrasoundintheassessmentofperianalfistulaincorrelationwithmrifistulography AT mohamedyehiaahmedelbarmelgi roleofendoanalultrasoundintheassessmentofperianalfistulaincorrelationwithmrifistulography AT hebaazzam roleofendoanalultrasoundintheassessmentofperianalfistulaincorrelationwithmrifistulography |