Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography

Abstract Background Perianal fistula is a considered as chronic recurrent inflammatory condition that requires proper surgical treatment and may require repeated intervention. Therefore, adequate pre-operative radiological diagnosis plays a critical role. In this study, we aimed at comparing the rol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alaa Sayed, Hatem Mohamed Said El-azizi, Mohamed Yehia Ahmed El-barmelgi, Heba Azzam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-08-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00869-y
_version_ 1798032057060818944
author Alaa Sayed
Hatem Mohamed Said El-azizi
Mohamed Yehia Ahmed El-barmelgi
Heba Azzam
author_facet Alaa Sayed
Hatem Mohamed Said El-azizi
Mohamed Yehia Ahmed El-barmelgi
Heba Azzam
author_sort Alaa Sayed
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Perianal fistula is a considered as chronic recurrent inflammatory condition that requires proper surgical treatment and may require repeated intervention. Therefore, adequate pre-operative radiological diagnosis plays a critical role. In this study, we aimed at comparing the role of endoanal ultrasonography with MRI fistulography in evaluating the primary fistula's tract, internal opening, secondary extensions, and complications of the perianal fistula. Results The study was carried over 108 males (90%) and 12 females (10%) presenting with clinically diagnosed perianal fistula. Ultrasound was found superior to MRI in the localization of the internal opening with estimated K value (0.44), P value (0.001). Regarding the type of fistula, ultrasound was found in agreement with MRI in 112 cases (93.3%) with estimated K value of about (0.7). Ultrasound was found equally effective as MRI in the detection of complication with estimated agreement K value of about 1. Regarding assessment of the secondary extensions, the agreement between the two modalities was about 50% with estimated k value of about 0.65. Conversely, MRI was found superior to ultrasound in the characterization of the fibrotic tracts. Conclusions Both EAUS and MRI have a crucial role in the evaluation and detection of perianal fistulas. EAUS was preferable to MRI in the localization of the internal opening; ,conversely, in the evaluation of extra-sphincteric fistulas and fibrotic tracts characterization MRI was preferable to EAUS.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:07:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-311f06814ee6414f87c1952184496722
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-4762
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:07:49Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
spelling doaj.art-311f06814ee6414f87c19521844967222022-12-22T04:05:16ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine2090-47622022-08-0153111110.1186/s43055-022-00869-yRole of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulographyAlaa Sayed0Hatem Mohamed Said El-azizi1Mohamed Yehia Ahmed El-barmelgi2Heba Azzam3Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityKasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityKasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityKasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityAbstract Background Perianal fistula is a considered as chronic recurrent inflammatory condition that requires proper surgical treatment and may require repeated intervention. Therefore, adequate pre-operative radiological diagnosis plays a critical role. In this study, we aimed at comparing the role of endoanal ultrasonography with MRI fistulography in evaluating the primary fistula's tract, internal opening, secondary extensions, and complications of the perianal fistula. Results The study was carried over 108 males (90%) and 12 females (10%) presenting with clinically diagnosed perianal fistula. Ultrasound was found superior to MRI in the localization of the internal opening with estimated K value (0.44), P value (0.001). Regarding the type of fistula, ultrasound was found in agreement with MRI in 112 cases (93.3%) with estimated K value of about (0.7). Ultrasound was found equally effective as MRI in the detection of complication with estimated agreement K value of about 1. Regarding assessment of the secondary extensions, the agreement between the two modalities was about 50% with estimated k value of about 0.65. Conversely, MRI was found superior to ultrasound in the characterization of the fibrotic tracts. Conclusions Both EAUS and MRI have a crucial role in the evaluation and detection of perianal fistulas. EAUS was preferable to MRI in the localization of the internal opening; ,conversely, in the evaluation of extra-sphincteric fistulas and fibrotic tracts characterization MRI was preferable to EAUS.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00869-yEndoanal ultrasoundPerianal fistulaMRI fistulography
spellingShingle Alaa Sayed
Hatem Mohamed Said El-azizi
Mohamed Yehia Ahmed El-barmelgi
Heba Azzam
Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Endoanal ultrasound
Perianal fistula
MRI fistulography
title Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography
title_full Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography
title_fullStr Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography
title_full_unstemmed Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography
title_short Role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with MRI fistulography
title_sort role of endoanal ultrasound in the assessment of perianal fistula in correlation with mri fistulography
topic Endoanal ultrasound
Perianal fistula
MRI fistulography
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00869-y
work_keys_str_mv AT alaasayed roleofendoanalultrasoundintheassessmentofperianalfistulaincorrelationwithmrifistulography
AT hatemmohamedsaidelazizi roleofendoanalultrasoundintheassessmentofperianalfistulaincorrelationwithmrifistulography
AT mohamedyehiaahmedelbarmelgi roleofendoanalultrasoundintheassessmentofperianalfistulaincorrelationwithmrifistulography
AT hebaazzam roleofendoanalultrasoundintheassessmentofperianalfistulaincorrelationwithmrifistulography