Evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection – A single-arm, prospective, interventional trial (PORTAL trial)

Background and Aims: The International Normalised Ratio (INR), which assesses the loss of procoagulant factors in the extrinsic pathway, fails to evaluate the coagulation abnormalities comprehensively after a major liver resection, which often leads to reduced synthesis of procoagulant and anticoagu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reshma Ambulkar, Vignesh Baskar, Shraddha Patkar, Aditya Kunte, Vandana Agarwal, Sohan Lal Solanki, Jigeeshu V Divatia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2023;volume=67;issue=12;spage=1077;epage=1083;aulast=Ambulkar
_version_ 1797352080471490560
author Reshma Ambulkar
Vignesh Baskar
Shraddha Patkar
Aditya Kunte
Vandana Agarwal
Sohan Lal Solanki
Jigeeshu V Divatia
author_facet Reshma Ambulkar
Vignesh Baskar
Shraddha Patkar
Aditya Kunte
Vandana Agarwal
Sohan Lal Solanki
Jigeeshu V Divatia
author_sort Reshma Ambulkar
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: The International Normalised Ratio (INR), which assesses the loss of procoagulant factors in the extrinsic pathway, fails to evaluate the coagulation abnormalities comprehensively after a major liver resection, which often leads to reduced synthesis of procoagulant and anticoagulant-factors. This study was conducted with an aim to study the trend and compare the results of routine coagulation tests and thromboelastography (TEG) during the perioperative period in patients undergoing major liver resections (≥3 segments). Methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent a major liver resection were enrolled. This prospective, single-arm, interventional study was performed with the primary objective of determining the serial changes in conventional coagulation tests and TEG during the perioperative period in patients undergoing major liver resections, at the preincision period, intraoperative period, postoperatively, at 48 h and on the fifth postoperative day. Transfusion requirements of blood components were also assessed with a TEG-guided replacement strategy. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to study the relationships of coagulation tests (both TEG and conventional tests) at each time point. Results: The prothrombin time (PT)-INR was elevated in 14 patients (56%) at the intraoperative, immediate postoperative and 48-h time points in contrast to the TEG parameters, which remained normal in all patients. Blood component transfusion was avoided in 4, 11 and 10 patients at the intraoperative, immediate postoperative and 48-h time points, respectively. Conclusion: International Normalised Ratio overestimates the coagulopathy in patients undergoing major liver resection, and a thromboelastography-guided transfusion strategy reduces overall transfusion requirements.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:11:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-313043f144104facaa23998887557d35
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0019-5049
0976-2817
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:11:05Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-313043f144104facaa23998887557d352024-01-18T12:28:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172023-01-0167121077108310.4103/ija.ija_344_23Evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection – A single-arm, prospective, interventional trial (PORTAL trial)Reshma AmbulkarVignesh BaskarShraddha PatkarAditya KunteVandana AgarwalSohan Lal SolankiJigeeshu V DivatiaBackground and Aims: The International Normalised Ratio (INR), which assesses the loss of procoagulant factors in the extrinsic pathway, fails to evaluate the coagulation abnormalities comprehensively after a major liver resection, which often leads to reduced synthesis of procoagulant and anticoagulant-factors. This study was conducted with an aim to study the trend and compare the results of routine coagulation tests and thromboelastography (TEG) during the perioperative period in patients undergoing major liver resections (≥3 segments). Methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent a major liver resection were enrolled. This prospective, single-arm, interventional study was performed with the primary objective of determining the serial changes in conventional coagulation tests and TEG during the perioperative period in patients undergoing major liver resections, at the preincision period, intraoperative period, postoperatively, at 48 h and on the fifth postoperative day. Transfusion requirements of blood components were also assessed with a TEG-guided replacement strategy. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to study the relationships of coagulation tests (both TEG and conventional tests) at each time point. Results: The prothrombin time (PT)-INR was elevated in 14 patients (56%) at the intraoperative, immediate postoperative and 48-h time points in contrast to the TEG parameters, which remained normal in all patients. Blood component transfusion was avoided in 4, 11 and 10 patients at the intraoperative, immediate postoperative and 48-h time points, respectively. Conclusion: International Normalised Ratio overestimates the coagulopathy in patients undergoing major liver resection, and a thromboelastography-guided transfusion strategy reduces overall transfusion requirements.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2023;volume=67;issue=12;spage=1077;epage=1083;aulast=Ambulkarblood transfusioncoagulationhepatectomyinternational normalised ratioperioperative outcomesprothrombin timethromboelastography
spellingShingle Reshma Ambulkar
Vignesh Baskar
Shraddha Patkar
Aditya Kunte
Vandana Agarwal
Sohan Lal Solanki
Jigeeshu V Divatia
Evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection – A single-arm, prospective, interventional trial (PORTAL trial)
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
blood transfusion
coagulation
hepatectomy
international normalised ratio
perioperative outcomes
prothrombin time
thromboelastography
title Evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection – A single-arm, prospective, interventional trial (PORTAL trial)
title_full Evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection – A single-arm, prospective, interventional trial (PORTAL trial)
title_fullStr Evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection – A single-arm, prospective, interventional trial (PORTAL trial)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection – A single-arm, prospective, interventional trial (PORTAL trial)
title_short Evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection – A single-arm, prospective, interventional trial (PORTAL trial)
title_sort evaluation of perioperative routine coagulation testing versus thromboelastography for major liver resection a single arm prospective interventional trial portal trial
topic blood transfusion
coagulation
hepatectomy
international normalised ratio
perioperative outcomes
prothrombin time
thromboelastography
url http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2023;volume=67;issue=12;spage=1077;epage=1083;aulast=Ambulkar
work_keys_str_mv AT reshmaambulkar evaluationofperioperativeroutinecoagulationtestingversusthromboelastographyformajorliverresectionasinglearmprospectiveinterventionaltrialportaltrial
AT vigneshbaskar evaluationofperioperativeroutinecoagulationtestingversusthromboelastographyformajorliverresectionasinglearmprospectiveinterventionaltrialportaltrial
AT shraddhapatkar evaluationofperioperativeroutinecoagulationtestingversusthromboelastographyformajorliverresectionasinglearmprospectiveinterventionaltrialportaltrial
AT adityakunte evaluationofperioperativeroutinecoagulationtestingversusthromboelastographyformajorliverresectionasinglearmprospectiveinterventionaltrialportaltrial
AT vandanaagarwal evaluationofperioperativeroutinecoagulationtestingversusthromboelastographyformajorliverresectionasinglearmprospectiveinterventionaltrialportaltrial
AT sohanlalsolanki evaluationofperioperativeroutinecoagulationtestingversusthromboelastographyformajorliverresectionasinglearmprospectiveinterventionaltrialportaltrial
AT jigeeshuvdivatia evaluationofperioperativeroutinecoagulationtestingversusthromboelastographyformajorliverresectionasinglearmprospectiveinterventionaltrialportaltrial