Determination of Ultra-Trace Cobalt in Water Samples Using Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Followed by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

A novel method for the determination of ultra-trace cobalt by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry has been developed. It is based on the color reaction of Co<sup>2+</sup> with 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-dimethylami...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quan Han, Yaqi Liu, Yanyan Huo, Dan Li, Xiaohui Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/9/2694
_version_ 1797503724497666048
author Quan Han
Yaqi Liu
Yanyan Huo
Dan Li
Xiaohui Yang
author_facet Quan Han
Yaqi Liu
Yanyan Huo
Dan Li
Xiaohui Yang
author_sort Quan Han
collection DOAJ
description A novel method for the determination of ultra-trace cobalt by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry has been developed. It is based on the color reaction of Co<sup>2+</sup> with 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-dimethylaminoaniline (5-Br-PADMA) in a Britton–Robinson buffer solution at pH 6.0 to form stable hydrophobic chelates, which were separated and enriched by DLLME with 1,2-dichloroethane (CH<sub>2</sub>ClCH<sub>2</sub>Cl) as extraction and acetonitrile (CH<sub>3</sub>CN) as a dispersive solvent. The sedimented phase containing the chelates is then determined with GFAAS. Parameters that affect extraction efficiency, such as types and volumes of extraction and disperser solvents, pH of sample solution, extraction time, concentration of the chelating agent 5-Br-PADMA, and salt effect, were investigated. Under optimal conditions, the calibration graph was linear over the range 0.05–1.0 ng/mL, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9922 and a detection limit of 0.03 ng/mL. Preconcentration factor (PF) is calculated as the ratio of the aqueous solution volume (5 mL) to that of the organic phase volume (40 μL), and enrichment factor (EF) is calculated as the ratio of the slopes of the calibration graphs obtained with and without DLLME for 5.0 mL of sample solution, which were 120 and 112.5, respectively. The extraction efficiency, calculated by EF/PF·100, was 93.8%. The relative standard deviation (RSD) at the 0.5 ng/mL Co<sup>2+</sup> level was 3.8% (<i>n</i> = 6). The method has been applied to the determination of trace cobalt in water samples with satisfactory results.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:54:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-313995dcf8c94c6caa3f995618566605
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1420-3049
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:54:25Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Molecules
spelling doaj.art-313995dcf8c94c6caa3f9956185666052023-11-23T08:48:15ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492022-04-01279269410.3390/molecules27092694Determination of Ultra-Trace Cobalt in Water Samples Using Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Followed by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption SpectrometryQuan Han0Yaqi Liu1Yanyan Huo2Dan Li3Xiaohui Yang4School of Chemical Engineering, Xi’an University, Xi’an 710065, ChinaSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yan′an University, Xi’an 716061, ChinaSchool of Chemical Engineering, Xi’an University, Xi’an 710065, ChinaSchool of Chemical Engineering, Xi’an University, Xi’an 710065, ChinaSchool of Chemical Engineering, Xi’an University, Xi’an 710065, ChinaA novel method for the determination of ultra-trace cobalt by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry has been developed. It is based on the color reaction of Co<sup>2+</sup> with 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-dimethylaminoaniline (5-Br-PADMA) in a Britton–Robinson buffer solution at pH 6.0 to form stable hydrophobic chelates, which were separated and enriched by DLLME with 1,2-dichloroethane (CH<sub>2</sub>ClCH<sub>2</sub>Cl) as extraction and acetonitrile (CH<sub>3</sub>CN) as a dispersive solvent. The sedimented phase containing the chelates is then determined with GFAAS. Parameters that affect extraction efficiency, such as types and volumes of extraction and disperser solvents, pH of sample solution, extraction time, concentration of the chelating agent 5-Br-PADMA, and salt effect, were investigated. Under optimal conditions, the calibration graph was linear over the range 0.05–1.0 ng/mL, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9922 and a detection limit of 0.03 ng/mL. Preconcentration factor (PF) is calculated as the ratio of the aqueous solution volume (5 mL) to that of the organic phase volume (40 μL), and enrichment factor (EF) is calculated as the ratio of the slopes of the calibration graphs obtained with and without DLLME for 5.0 mL of sample solution, which were 120 and 112.5, respectively. The extraction efficiency, calculated by EF/PF·100, was 93.8%. The relative standard deviation (RSD) at the 0.5 ng/mL Co<sup>2+</sup> level was 3.8% (<i>n</i> = 6). The method has been applied to the determination of trace cobalt in water samples with satisfactory results.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/9/2694dispersive liquid–liquid microextractiongraphite furnace atomic absorptionspectrometrycobalt2-(5-bromopyridyazo)-5-dimethylaminoanline1,2-dichloroethanacetonitrile
spellingShingle Quan Han
Yaqi Liu
Yanyan Huo
Dan Li
Xiaohui Yang
Determination of Ultra-Trace Cobalt in Water Samples Using Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Followed by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
Molecules
dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
graphite furnace atomic absorptionspectrometry
cobalt
2-(5-bromopyridyazo)-5-dimethylaminoanline
1,2-dichloroethan
acetonitrile
title Determination of Ultra-Trace Cobalt in Water Samples Using Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Followed by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
title_full Determination of Ultra-Trace Cobalt in Water Samples Using Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Followed by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
title_fullStr Determination of Ultra-Trace Cobalt in Water Samples Using Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Followed by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Determination of Ultra-Trace Cobalt in Water Samples Using Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Followed by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
title_short Determination of Ultra-Trace Cobalt in Water Samples Using Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Followed by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
title_sort determination of ultra trace cobalt in water samples using dispersive liquid liquid microextraction followed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry
topic dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
graphite furnace atomic absorptionspectrometry
cobalt
2-(5-bromopyridyazo)-5-dimethylaminoanline
1,2-dichloroethan
acetonitrile
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/9/2694
work_keys_str_mv AT quanhan determinationofultratracecobaltinwatersamplesusingdispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionfollowedbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry
AT yaqiliu determinationofultratracecobaltinwatersamplesusingdispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionfollowedbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry
AT yanyanhuo determinationofultratracecobaltinwatersamplesusingdispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionfollowedbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry
AT danli determinationofultratracecobaltinwatersamplesusingdispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionfollowedbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry
AT xiaohuiyang determinationofultratracecobaltinwatersamplesusingdispersiveliquidliquidmicroextractionfollowedbygraphitefurnaceatomicabsorptionspectrometry