Clinical comparison and agreement of PCR, antigen, and viral culture for the diagnosis of COVID-19

The aim of this study is to compare the COVID-19 nasopharyngeal PCR (NP PCR) to antigen, nasal PCR, and viral culture. One-hundred-and-fourteen risk-stratified patients were tested by culture, nasal PCR, NP PCR, and Ag testing. Twenty (48%) of the high risk and 23 (32%) of the low risk were NP PCR p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda Agard, Omar Elsheikh, Drew Bell, Ryan F. Relich, Bryan H. Schmitt, Josh Sadowski, William Fadel, Douglas H. Webb, Lana Dbeibo, Kristen Kelley, Mariel Carozza, Guang-Shen Lei, Paul Calkins, Cole Beeler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038022000382
Description
Summary:The aim of this study is to compare the COVID-19 nasopharyngeal PCR (NP PCR) to antigen, nasal PCR, and viral culture. One-hundred-and-fourteen risk-stratified patients were tested by culture, nasal PCR, NP PCR, and Ag testing. Twenty (48%) of the high risk and 23 (32%) of the low risk were NP PCR positive. Compared with NP PCR, the sensitivity of nasal PCR, Sofia Ag, BinaxNOW Ag, and culture were 44%, 31%, 37%, and 15%. In the high risk group, the sensitivity of these tests improved to 71%, 37%, 50%, and 22%. Agreement between tests was highest between nasal PCR and both antigen tests. Patients who were NP PCR positive but antigen negative were more likely to have remote prior COVID-19 infection (p<0.01). Nasal PCR and antigen positive patients were more likely to have symptoms (p = 0.01).
ISSN:2667-0380