If you build it, will they come? Linking researcher engagement and scientific productivity in large infrastructure grants

Abstract Introduction: The NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program supports the creation of program infrastructure promoting scientific collaboration and improvement in translational research. While most evaluations of these and similar programs focus on scientific outcomes su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Todd B. Combs, Bobbi J. Carothers, Yuanchen Liu, Bradley Evanoff, Douglas A. Luke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866121000170/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156546820767744
author Todd B. Combs
Bobbi J. Carothers
Yuanchen Liu
Bradley Evanoff
Douglas A. Luke
author_facet Todd B. Combs
Bobbi J. Carothers
Yuanchen Liu
Bradley Evanoff
Douglas A. Luke
author_sort Todd B. Combs
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction: The NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program supports the creation of program infrastructure promoting scientific collaboration and improvement in translational research. While most evaluations of these and similar programs focus on scientific outcomes such as grants and publications, few studies investigate the underlying mechanisms through which large infrastructure grants produce scientific or translational benefits. This study investigated how engagement – researchers’ interactions with CTSA-funded resources – can help to increase scientific productivity. Methods: Authors 1) developed process indicators to define engagement in the CTSA infrastructure at Washington University in St. Louis in four general categories (core service use, internal funding, mentor-mentee opportunities, and leadership roles); 2) explored the relationship between CTSA engagement and scholarly productivity; and 3) compared the relationships between engagement and productivity across gender and race/ethnicity. Mixed effects Poisson regressions modeled productivity outcomes on engagement, controlling for demographic and academic characteristics. Results: CTSA members who were engaged were more likely to publish papers and submit grants when compared to others. They were more likely to receive external grant awards – 10% to 20% percent more – than those who were not engaged. Productivity disparities between men and women and to a lesser extent across categories of race and ethnicity persisted even in samples matched on previous productivity levels. Conclusions: CTSAs could see larger growth in scientific productivity by increasing researcher engagement and addressing demographic disparities – possibly through focused communications to raise awareness of opportunities – and dissemination of case studies and success stories of engagement to membership.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:53:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-314fc49bcbe44c99954d6048a0de4d77
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:53:28Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-314fc49bcbe44c99954d6048a0de4d772023-03-09T12:31:03ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612021-01-01510.1017/cts.2021.17If you build it, will they come? Linking researcher engagement and scientific productivity in large infrastructure grantsTodd B. Combs0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1015-6589Bobbi J. Carothers1Yuanchen Liu2Bradley Evanoff3Douglas A. Luke4Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USACenter for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USACenter for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USASchool of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USACenter for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA Abstract Introduction: The NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program supports the creation of program infrastructure promoting scientific collaboration and improvement in translational research. While most evaluations of these and similar programs focus on scientific outcomes such as grants and publications, few studies investigate the underlying mechanisms through which large infrastructure grants produce scientific or translational benefits. This study investigated how engagement – researchers’ interactions with CTSA-funded resources – can help to increase scientific productivity. Methods: Authors 1) developed process indicators to define engagement in the CTSA infrastructure at Washington University in St. Louis in four general categories (core service use, internal funding, mentor-mentee opportunities, and leadership roles); 2) explored the relationship between CTSA engagement and scholarly productivity; and 3) compared the relationships between engagement and productivity across gender and race/ethnicity. Mixed effects Poisson regressions modeled productivity outcomes on engagement, controlling for demographic and academic characteristics. Results: CTSA members who were engaged were more likely to publish papers and submit grants when compared to others. They were more likely to receive external grant awards – 10% to 20% percent more – than those who were not engaged. Productivity disparities between men and women and to a lesser extent across categories of race and ethnicity persisted even in samples matched on previous productivity levels. Conclusions: CTSAs could see larger growth in scientific productivity by increasing researcher engagement and addressing demographic disparities – possibly through focused communications to raise awareness of opportunities – and dissemination of case studies and success stories of engagement to membership. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866121000170/type/journal_articleTranslational researchdesign and analysis
spellingShingle Todd B. Combs
Bobbi J. Carothers
Yuanchen Liu
Bradley Evanoff
Douglas A. Luke
If you build it, will they come? Linking researcher engagement and scientific productivity in large infrastructure grants
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Translational research
design and analysis
title If you build it, will they come? Linking researcher engagement and scientific productivity in large infrastructure grants
title_full If you build it, will they come? Linking researcher engagement and scientific productivity in large infrastructure grants
title_fullStr If you build it, will they come? Linking researcher engagement and scientific productivity in large infrastructure grants
title_full_unstemmed If you build it, will they come? Linking researcher engagement and scientific productivity in large infrastructure grants
title_short If you build it, will they come? Linking researcher engagement and scientific productivity in large infrastructure grants
title_sort if you build it will they come linking researcher engagement and scientific productivity in large infrastructure grants
topic Translational research
design and analysis
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866121000170/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT toddbcombs ifyoubuilditwilltheycomelinkingresearcherengagementandscientificproductivityinlargeinfrastructuregrants
AT bobbijcarothers ifyoubuilditwilltheycomelinkingresearcherengagementandscientificproductivityinlargeinfrastructuregrants
AT yuanchenliu ifyoubuilditwilltheycomelinkingresearcherengagementandscientificproductivityinlargeinfrastructuregrants
AT bradleyevanoff ifyoubuilditwilltheycomelinkingresearcherengagementandscientificproductivityinlargeinfrastructuregrants
AT douglasaluke ifyoubuilditwilltheycomelinkingresearcherengagementandscientificproductivityinlargeinfrastructuregrants