Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0
Abstract Background Current treatment options for patellofemoral (PF) instability have required functional scoring systems. The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 and Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) scores were explicitly created to meet the need to evaluate PF instability. Differen...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2024-02-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04612-3 |
| _version_ | 1827326709919121408 |
|---|---|
| author | Engin Turkay Yilmaz Ibrahim Mehmet Goymen Melih Oral Ozan Tuncay Gokay Dursun Egemen Turhan Ahmet Mazhar Tokgozoglu |
| author_facet | Engin Turkay Yilmaz Ibrahim Mehmet Goymen Melih Oral Ozan Tuncay Gokay Dursun Egemen Turhan Ahmet Mazhar Tokgozoglu |
| author_sort | Engin Turkay Yilmaz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Current treatment options for patellofemoral (PF) instability have required functional scoring systems. The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 and Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) scores were explicitly created to meet the need to evaluate PF instability. Different patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are used to evaluate anterior knee problems. Objectives To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score. Study design and methods Fifty-one patients that operated for PF instability, older than eighteen years old, were included in this study. Turkish translation of the BPII 2.0 and NPI scores was undertaken through translation into Turkish by an independent translator. Two tests were repeated seven days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for test–retest reliability. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Validity was assessed by correlating the Kujala and Lysholm knee scores. Results Fifty-one patients (34 females/17 males), the average age was 25 ± 7, were included in this study. Cronbach's alpha value was 0.829 for BPII 2.0 and 0.843 for NPI for the first time answered by patients. ICC values applied to evaluate test–retest reliability were 0.904 (p < 0.05) for BPII 2.0 and 0.915 (p < 0.05) for NPI. There was a moderate correlation between the BPII 2.0 Turkish version and the Kujala score. There was a very high correlation between the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and Lysholm knee scores. An excellent negative correlation was found between Norwich and Kujala scores (r = −0.819, p < 0.05). The correlation coefficient between Norwich and Lysholm scores was −0.662, indicating a high negative correlation (p < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between the Turkish version of BPII 2.0 and NPI were −0.533 (p < 0.05). Conclusions The Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score is a reliable and valid instrument for Turkish-speaking patients with patellofemoral instability. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:49:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-31549760d5d144b687b2669aa50ed04a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1749-799X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:49:24Z |
| publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-31549760d5d144b687b2669aa50ed04a2024-03-05T19:46:14ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2024-02-011911610.1186/s13018-024-04612-3Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0Engin Turkay Yilmaz0Ibrahim Mehmet Goymen1Melih Oral2Ozan Tuncay3Gokay Dursun4Egemen Turhan5Ahmet Mazhar Tokgozoglu6Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical SchoolOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical SchoolOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical SchoolOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical SchoolOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical SchoolOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical SchoolOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical SchoolAbstract Background Current treatment options for patellofemoral (PF) instability have required functional scoring systems. The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 and Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) scores were explicitly created to meet the need to evaluate PF instability. Different patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are used to evaluate anterior knee problems. Objectives To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score. Study design and methods Fifty-one patients that operated for PF instability, older than eighteen years old, were included in this study. Turkish translation of the BPII 2.0 and NPI scores was undertaken through translation into Turkish by an independent translator. Two tests were repeated seven days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for test–retest reliability. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Validity was assessed by correlating the Kujala and Lysholm knee scores. Results Fifty-one patients (34 females/17 males), the average age was 25 ± 7, were included in this study. Cronbach's alpha value was 0.829 for BPII 2.0 and 0.843 for NPI for the first time answered by patients. ICC values applied to evaluate test–retest reliability were 0.904 (p < 0.05) for BPII 2.0 and 0.915 (p < 0.05) for NPI. There was a moderate correlation between the BPII 2.0 Turkish version and the Kujala score. There was a very high correlation between the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and Lysholm knee scores. An excellent negative correlation was found between Norwich and Kujala scores (r = −0.819, p < 0.05). The correlation coefficient between Norwich and Lysholm scores was −0.662, indicating a high negative correlation (p < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between the Turkish version of BPII 2.0 and NPI were −0.533 (p < 0.05). Conclusions The Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score is a reliable and valid instrument for Turkish-speaking patients with patellofemoral instability.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04612-3 |
| spellingShingle | Engin Turkay Yilmaz Ibrahim Mehmet Goymen Melih Oral Ozan Tuncay Gokay Dursun Egemen Turhan Ahmet Mazhar Tokgozoglu Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
| title | Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 |
| title_full | Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 |
| title_fullStr | Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 |
| title_short | Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 |
| title_sort | translation reliability and validity of the turkish versions of norwich patellar instability score and the banff patellar instability instrument 2 0 |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04612-3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT enginturkayyilmaz translationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionsofnorwichpatellarinstabilityscoreandthebanffpatellarinstabilityinstrument20 AT ibrahimmehmetgoymen translationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionsofnorwichpatellarinstabilityscoreandthebanffpatellarinstabilityinstrument20 AT melihoral translationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionsofnorwichpatellarinstabilityscoreandthebanffpatellarinstabilityinstrument20 AT ozantuncay translationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionsofnorwichpatellarinstabilityscoreandthebanffpatellarinstabilityinstrument20 AT gokaydursun translationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionsofnorwichpatellarinstabilityscoreandthebanffpatellarinstabilityinstrument20 AT egementurhan translationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionsofnorwichpatellarinstabilityscoreandthebanffpatellarinstabilityinstrument20 AT ahmetmazhartokgozoglu translationreliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionsofnorwichpatellarinstabilityscoreandthebanffpatellarinstabilityinstrument20 |