Incorporating and addressing testing bias within estimates of epidemic dynamics for SARS-CoV-2

Abstract Background The disease burden of SARS-CoV-2 as measured by tests from various localities, and at different time points present varying estimates of infection and fatality rates. Models based on these acquired data may suffer from systematic errors and large estimation variances due to the b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yasir Suhail, Junaid Afzal, Kshitiz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01196-4
_version_ 1818418699861753856
author Yasir Suhail
Junaid Afzal
Kshitiz
author_facet Yasir Suhail
Junaid Afzal
Kshitiz
author_sort Yasir Suhail
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The disease burden of SARS-CoV-2 as measured by tests from various localities, and at different time points present varying estimates of infection and fatality rates. Models based on these acquired data may suffer from systematic errors and large estimation variances due to the biases associated with testing. An unbiased randomized testing to estimate the true fatality rate is still missing. Methods Here, we characterize the effect of incidental sampling bias in the estimation of epidemic dynamics. Towards this, we explicitly modeled for sampling bias in an augmented compartment model to predict epidemic dynamics. We further calculate the bias from differences in disease prediction from biased, and randomized sampling, proposing a strategy to obtain unbiased estimates. Results Our simulations demonstrate that sampling biases in favor of patients with higher disease manifestation could significantly affect direct estimates of infection and fatality rates calculated from the numbers of confirmed cases and deaths, and serological testing can partially mitigate these biased estimates. Conclusions The augmented compartmental model allows the explicit modeling of different testing policies and their effects on disease estimates. Our calculations for the dependence of expected confidence on a randomized sample sizes, show that relatively small sample sizes can provide statistically significant estimates for SARS-CoV-2 related death rates.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T12:26:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3159fa55c9a84bb18192020eb78c72d7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T12:26:50Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-3159fa55c9a84bb18192020eb78c72d72022-12-21T23:01:17ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882021-01-0121111310.1186/s12874-020-01196-4Incorporating and addressing testing bias within estimates of epidemic dynamics for SARS-CoV-2Yasir Suhail0Junaid Afzal1Kshitiz2Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut HealthDepartment of Medicine, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut HealthAbstract Background The disease burden of SARS-CoV-2 as measured by tests from various localities, and at different time points present varying estimates of infection and fatality rates. Models based on these acquired data may suffer from systematic errors and large estimation variances due to the biases associated with testing. An unbiased randomized testing to estimate the true fatality rate is still missing. Methods Here, we characterize the effect of incidental sampling bias in the estimation of epidemic dynamics. Towards this, we explicitly modeled for sampling bias in an augmented compartment model to predict epidemic dynamics. We further calculate the bias from differences in disease prediction from biased, and randomized sampling, proposing a strategy to obtain unbiased estimates. Results Our simulations demonstrate that sampling biases in favor of patients with higher disease manifestation could significantly affect direct estimates of infection and fatality rates calculated from the numbers of confirmed cases and deaths, and serological testing can partially mitigate these biased estimates. Conclusions The augmented compartmental model allows the explicit modeling of different testing policies and their effects on disease estimates. Our calculations for the dependence of expected confidence on a randomized sample sizes, show that relatively small sample sizes can provide statistically significant estimates for SARS-CoV-2 related death rates.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01196-4SARS-CoV-2EpidemiologySampling biasCovid-19, inaccurate epidemic predictions, overestimation of COVID death rate
spellingShingle Yasir Suhail
Junaid Afzal
Kshitiz
Incorporating and addressing testing bias within estimates of epidemic dynamics for SARS-CoV-2
BMC Medical Research Methodology
SARS-CoV-2
Epidemiology
Sampling bias
Covid-19, inaccurate epidemic predictions, overestimation of COVID death rate
title Incorporating and addressing testing bias within estimates of epidemic dynamics for SARS-CoV-2
title_full Incorporating and addressing testing bias within estimates of epidemic dynamics for SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Incorporating and addressing testing bias within estimates of epidemic dynamics for SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating and addressing testing bias within estimates of epidemic dynamics for SARS-CoV-2
title_short Incorporating and addressing testing bias within estimates of epidemic dynamics for SARS-CoV-2
title_sort incorporating and addressing testing bias within estimates of epidemic dynamics for sars cov 2
topic SARS-CoV-2
Epidemiology
Sampling bias
Covid-19, inaccurate epidemic predictions, overestimation of COVID death rate
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01196-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yasirsuhail incorporatingandaddressingtestingbiaswithinestimatesofepidemicdynamicsforsarscov2
AT junaidafzal incorporatingandaddressingtestingbiaswithinestimatesofepidemicdynamicsforsarscov2
AT kshitiz incorporatingandaddressingtestingbiaswithinestimatesofepidemicdynamicsforsarscov2