Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff.
Significant efforts are underway within the biomedical research community to encourage sharing and reuse of research data in order to enhance research reproducibility and enable scientific discovery. While some technological challenges do exist, many of the barriers to sharing and reuse are social i...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4481309?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1818034256325115904 |
|---|---|
| author | Lisa M Federer Ya-Ling Lu Douglas J Joubert Judith Welsh Barbara Brandys |
| author_facet | Lisa M Federer Ya-Ling Lu Douglas J Joubert Judith Welsh Barbara Brandys |
| author_sort | Lisa M Federer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Significant efforts are underway within the biomedical research community to encourage sharing and reuse of research data in order to enhance research reproducibility and enable scientific discovery. While some technological challenges do exist, many of the barriers to sharing and reuse are social in nature, arising from researchers' concerns about and attitudes toward sharing their data. In addition, clinical and basic science researchers face their own unique sets of challenges to sharing data within their communities. This study investigates these differences in experiences with and perceptions about sharing data, as well as barriers to sharing among clinical and basic science researchers.Clinical and basic science researchers in the Intramural Research Program at the National Institutes of Health were surveyed about their attitudes toward and experiences with sharing and reusing research data. Of 190 respondents to the survey, the 135 respondents who identified themselves as clinical or basic science researchers were included in this analysis. Odds ratio and Fisher's exact tests were the primary methods to examine potential relationships between variables. Worst-case scenario sensitivity tests were conducted when necessary.While most respondents considered data sharing and reuse important to their work, they generally rated their expertise as low. Sharing data directly with other researchers was common, but most respondents did not have experience with uploading data to a repository. A number of significant differences exist between the attitudes and practices of clinical and basic science researchers, including their motivations for sharing, their reasons for not sharing, and the amount of work required to prepare their data.Even within the scope of biomedical research, addressing the unique concerns of diverse research communities is important to encouraging researchers to share and reuse data. Efforts at promoting data sharing and reuse should be aimed at solving not only technological problems, but also addressing researchers' concerns about sharing their data. Given the varied practices of individual researchers and research communities, standardizing data practices like data citation and repository upload could make sharing and reuse easier. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T06:36:16Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-315bcf9c734d43b3a9b50b710f7033df |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T06:36:16Z |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-315bcf9c734d43b3a9b50b710f7033df2022-12-22T01:58:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e012950610.1371/journal.pone.0129506Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff.Lisa M FedererYa-Ling LuDouglas J JoubertJudith WelshBarbara BrandysSignificant efforts are underway within the biomedical research community to encourage sharing and reuse of research data in order to enhance research reproducibility and enable scientific discovery. While some technological challenges do exist, many of the barriers to sharing and reuse are social in nature, arising from researchers' concerns about and attitudes toward sharing their data. In addition, clinical and basic science researchers face their own unique sets of challenges to sharing data within their communities. This study investigates these differences in experiences with and perceptions about sharing data, as well as barriers to sharing among clinical and basic science researchers.Clinical and basic science researchers in the Intramural Research Program at the National Institutes of Health were surveyed about their attitudes toward and experiences with sharing and reusing research data. Of 190 respondents to the survey, the 135 respondents who identified themselves as clinical or basic science researchers were included in this analysis. Odds ratio and Fisher's exact tests were the primary methods to examine potential relationships between variables. Worst-case scenario sensitivity tests were conducted when necessary.While most respondents considered data sharing and reuse important to their work, they generally rated their expertise as low. Sharing data directly with other researchers was common, but most respondents did not have experience with uploading data to a repository. A number of significant differences exist between the attitudes and practices of clinical and basic science researchers, including their motivations for sharing, their reasons for not sharing, and the amount of work required to prepare their data.Even within the scope of biomedical research, addressing the unique concerns of diverse research communities is important to encouraging researchers to share and reuse data. Efforts at promoting data sharing and reuse should be aimed at solving not only technological problems, but also addressing researchers' concerns about sharing their data. Given the varied practices of individual researchers and research communities, standardizing data practices like data citation and repository upload could make sharing and reuse easier.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4481309?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Lisa M Federer Ya-Ling Lu Douglas J Joubert Judith Welsh Barbara Brandys Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff. PLoS ONE |
| title | Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff. |
| title_full | Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff. |
| title_fullStr | Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff. |
| title_short | Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff. |
| title_sort | biomedical data sharing and reuse attitudes and practices of clinical and scientific research staff |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4481309?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lisamfederer biomedicaldatasharingandreuseattitudesandpracticesofclinicalandscientificresearchstaff AT yalinglu biomedicaldatasharingandreuseattitudesandpracticesofclinicalandscientificresearchstaff AT douglasjjoubert biomedicaldatasharingandreuseattitudesandpracticesofclinicalandscientificresearchstaff AT judithwelsh biomedicaldatasharingandreuseattitudesandpracticesofclinicalandscientificresearchstaff AT barbarabrandys biomedicaldatasharingandreuseattitudesandpracticesofclinicalandscientificresearchstaff |