Comparative-Critical Review of the Views of Ibn Sina, Fakhr Razi, and Mulla Sadra about the Occurrence and Step of Nature

In this article, after the precise statement of the topic and purpose of occurrence and progress, Ibn Sina's, Fakhr Razi's, and Sadr al-Mutalahin Shirazi's views on the occurrence or time step of the natural world have been presented and critically analyzed. According to the historica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: maryam khoshnevisan, Seyed Sadruddin Taheri, Babak Abbasi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2022-06-01
Series:حکمت و فلسفه
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_15427_3aad6721fc37119ecf0db3da546af0c8.pdf
_version_ 1797387445220671488
author maryam khoshnevisan
Seyed Sadruddin Taheri
Babak Abbasi
author_facet maryam khoshnevisan
Seyed Sadruddin Taheri
Babak Abbasi
author_sort maryam khoshnevisan
collection DOAJ
description In this article, after the precise statement of the topic and purpose of occurrence and progress, Ibn Sina's, Fakhr Razi's, and Sadr al-Mutalahin Shirazi's views on the occurrence or time step of the natural world have been presented and critically analyzed. According to the historical order, Ibn Sina's opinion based on the antiquity of nature, and a reason for it, based on the natural-philosophical rule, "every event is preceded by matter and duration" is established. Then, the criticisms of Ghazali and Fakhr Razi, which are similar to each other, and Khwaja Tusi's response to Fakhr Razi's criticism are presented, and, in the continuation, the opinion of Mullasadra, which agrees with Ibn Sina, is narrated. In the following, a reference was made to Mulla Sadra's special opinion about the temporal occurrence of nature based on intrinsic movement, and it was pointed out that this opinion can be summed up with any occurrence or step of nature. Then, two side problems related to the discussion: the infinite sequence of equipment and the specific problem of entities, have been raised and resolved. The summary and conclusion of the article are also given at the end and, in the conclusion, the theologian's opinion regarding the temporal occurrence of nature is ambiguous and inefficient, and the opinion of philosophers is preferred over nature's step.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T22:24:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-316ba17fca204056ac6f6061b60f2e83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-3238
2476-6038
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T22:24:15Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series حکمت و فلسفه
spelling doaj.art-316ba17fca204056ac6f6061b60f2e832023-12-18T10:48:12ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University Pressحکمت و فلسفه1735-32382476-60382022-06-011870275310.22054/wph.2022.66805.205815427Comparative-Critical Review of the Views of Ibn Sina, Fakhr Razi, and Mulla Sadra about the Occurrence and Step of Naturemaryam khoshnevisan0Seyed Sadruddin Taheri1Babak Abbasi2Ph.D. Student in Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IranProfessor of Philosophy, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, IranAssistant Professor of Philosophy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IranIn this article, after the precise statement of the topic and purpose of occurrence and progress, Ibn Sina's, Fakhr Razi's, and Sadr al-Mutalahin Shirazi's views on the occurrence or time step of the natural world have been presented and critically analyzed. According to the historical order, Ibn Sina's opinion based on the antiquity of nature, and a reason for it, based on the natural-philosophical rule, "every event is preceded by matter and duration" is established. Then, the criticisms of Ghazali and Fakhr Razi, which are similar to each other, and Khwaja Tusi's response to Fakhr Razi's criticism are presented, and, in the continuation, the opinion of Mullasadra, which agrees with Ibn Sina, is narrated. In the following, a reference was made to Mulla Sadra's special opinion about the temporal occurrence of nature based on intrinsic movement, and it was pointed out that this opinion can be summed up with any occurrence or step of nature. Then, two side problems related to the discussion: the infinite sequence of equipment and the specific problem of entities, have been raised and resolved. The summary and conclusion of the article are also given at the end and, in the conclusion, the theologian's opinion regarding the temporal occurrence of nature is ambiguous and inefficient, and the opinion of philosophers is preferred over nature's step.https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_15427_3aad6721fc37119ecf0db3da546af0c8.pdfoccurrence. age. obedience sequence of equipment. a matter move. time. talent actuality determinant
spellingShingle maryam khoshnevisan
Seyed Sadruddin Taheri
Babak Abbasi
Comparative-Critical Review of the Views of Ibn Sina, Fakhr Razi, and Mulla Sadra about the Occurrence and Step of Nature
حکمت و فلسفه
occurrence. age. obedience sequence of equipment. a matter move. time. talent actuality determinant
title Comparative-Critical Review of the Views of Ibn Sina, Fakhr Razi, and Mulla Sadra about the Occurrence and Step of Nature
title_full Comparative-Critical Review of the Views of Ibn Sina, Fakhr Razi, and Mulla Sadra about the Occurrence and Step of Nature
title_fullStr Comparative-Critical Review of the Views of Ibn Sina, Fakhr Razi, and Mulla Sadra about the Occurrence and Step of Nature
title_full_unstemmed Comparative-Critical Review of the Views of Ibn Sina, Fakhr Razi, and Mulla Sadra about the Occurrence and Step of Nature
title_short Comparative-Critical Review of the Views of Ibn Sina, Fakhr Razi, and Mulla Sadra about the Occurrence and Step of Nature
title_sort comparative critical review of the views of ibn sina fakhr razi and mulla sadra about the occurrence and step of nature
topic occurrence. age. obedience sequence of equipment. a matter move. time. talent actuality determinant
url https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_15427_3aad6721fc37119ecf0db3da546af0c8.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT maryamkhoshnevisan comparativecriticalreviewoftheviewsofibnsinafakhrraziandmullasadraabouttheoccurrenceandstepofnature
AT seyedsadruddintaheri comparativecriticalreviewoftheviewsofibnsinafakhrraziandmullasadraabouttheoccurrenceandstepofnature
AT babakabbasi comparativecriticalreviewoftheviewsofibnsinafakhrraziandmullasadraabouttheoccurrenceandstepofnature