Bioprospects of Endophytic Bacteria in Plant Growth Promotion and Ag-Nanoparticle Biosynthesis

In this study, five endophytic bacterial strains, namely <i>Rhizobium pusense</i> (MS-1), <i>Bacillus cereus</i> MS-2, <i>Bacillus flexus</i> (MS-3), <i>Methylophilus flavus</i> (MS-4), and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (MS-5), were used to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monika Singh, Kamal A. Qureshi, Mariusz Jaremko, Minakshi Rajput, Sandeep Kumar Singh, Kaushalendra, Kapil D. Pandey, Luiz Fernando Romanholo Ferreira, Ajay Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Plants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/14/1787
_version_ 1797433167417704448
author Monika Singh
Kamal A. Qureshi
Mariusz Jaremko
Minakshi Rajput
Sandeep Kumar Singh
Kaushalendra
Kapil D. Pandey
Luiz Fernando Romanholo Ferreira
Ajay Kumar
author_facet Monika Singh
Kamal A. Qureshi
Mariusz Jaremko
Minakshi Rajput
Sandeep Kumar Singh
Kaushalendra
Kapil D. Pandey
Luiz Fernando Romanholo Ferreira
Ajay Kumar
author_sort Monika Singh
collection DOAJ
description In this study, five endophytic bacterial strains, namely <i>Rhizobium pusense</i> (MS-1), <i>Bacillus cereus</i> MS-2, <i>Bacillus flexus</i> (MS-3), <i>Methylophilus flavus</i> (MS-4), and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (MS-5), were used to investigate their potential role in the enhancement of growth yields of two types of tomato varieties, viz. hybrid and local, and in the biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). The inoculation of bacterial strains enhanced the root and shoot length, biomass, and leaf chlorophyll contents. The fruit weight of the tomato (kg/plant) was also higher in the bacteria inoculated plants of both hybrid and local varieties than in the control (untreated). A significant increase was recorded in the fruit yield (g/plant) in all the treatments, whereas <i>Methylophilus flavus</i> (MS-4) inoculated plants yielded nearly 2.5 times more fruit weight compared to the control in the hybrid variety and two times higher in the local variety. The response to <i>M. flavus</i> as a microbial inoculant was greater than to the other strains. Biosynthesis of Ag nanoparticles was also carried out using all five endophytic bacterial strains. The weakest producers of AgNPs were <i>Rhizobium pusense</i> (MS-1) and <i>Methylophilus flavus</i> (MS-4), while <i>Bacillus cereus</i> MS-2, <i>Bacillus flexus</i> (MS-3), and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (MS-5) were strong producers of AgNPs. Nanoparticles were further characterized using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), UV-Vis spectrophotometry, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and revealed cuboidal shaped AgNPs in the <i>Bacillus cereus</i> MS-2 strain. In addition, the biosynthesized AgNPs showed antibacterial activity against various pathogenic and endophytic bacterial strains.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:13:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-316e6482f0284c99bc88da887754c355
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2223-7747
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:13:13Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Plants
spelling doaj.art-316e6482f0284c99bc88da887754c3552023-12-01T22:35:31ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472022-07-011114178710.3390/plants11141787Bioprospects of Endophytic Bacteria in Plant Growth Promotion and Ag-Nanoparticle BiosynthesisMonika Singh0Kamal A. Qureshi1Mariusz Jaremko2Minakshi Rajput3Sandeep Kumar Singh4Kaushalendra5Kapil D. Pandey6Luiz Fernando Romanholo Ferreira7Ajay Kumar8Department of Biotechnology, School of Applied and Life Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, IndiaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Unaizah 51911, Saudi ArabiaSmart-Health Initiative (SHI) and Red Sea Research Center (RSRC), Division of Biological and Environment Sciences and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Applied and Life Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, IndiaDivision of Microbiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, IndiaDepartment of Zoology, Pachhunga University College Campus, Mizoram University (a Central University), Aizawl 796001, IndiaCentre of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, IndiaInstitute for Technology and Research (ITP), Tiradentes University-UNIT, Aracaju 49032-490, SE, BrazilCentre of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, IndiaIn this study, five endophytic bacterial strains, namely <i>Rhizobium pusense</i> (MS-1), <i>Bacillus cereus</i> MS-2, <i>Bacillus flexus</i> (MS-3), <i>Methylophilus flavus</i> (MS-4), and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (MS-5), were used to investigate their potential role in the enhancement of growth yields of two types of tomato varieties, viz. hybrid and local, and in the biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). The inoculation of bacterial strains enhanced the root and shoot length, biomass, and leaf chlorophyll contents. The fruit weight of the tomato (kg/plant) was also higher in the bacteria inoculated plants of both hybrid and local varieties than in the control (untreated). A significant increase was recorded in the fruit yield (g/plant) in all the treatments, whereas <i>Methylophilus flavus</i> (MS-4) inoculated plants yielded nearly 2.5 times more fruit weight compared to the control in the hybrid variety and two times higher in the local variety. The response to <i>M. flavus</i> as a microbial inoculant was greater than to the other strains. Biosynthesis of Ag nanoparticles was also carried out using all five endophytic bacterial strains. The weakest producers of AgNPs were <i>Rhizobium pusense</i> (MS-1) and <i>Methylophilus flavus</i> (MS-4), while <i>Bacillus cereus</i> MS-2, <i>Bacillus flexus</i> (MS-3), and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (MS-5) were strong producers of AgNPs. Nanoparticles were further characterized using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), UV-Vis spectrophotometry, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and revealed cuboidal shaped AgNPs in the <i>Bacillus cereus</i> MS-2 strain. In addition, the biosynthesized AgNPs showed antibacterial activity against various pathogenic and endophytic bacterial strains.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/14/1787endophytic bacteriaplant growth promotiontomatoAg-nanoparticlesHR-SEMTEM
spellingShingle Monika Singh
Kamal A. Qureshi
Mariusz Jaremko
Minakshi Rajput
Sandeep Kumar Singh
Kaushalendra
Kapil D. Pandey
Luiz Fernando Romanholo Ferreira
Ajay Kumar
Bioprospects of Endophytic Bacteria in Plant Growth Promotion and Ag-Nanoparticle Biosynthesis
Plants
endophytic bacteria
plant growth promotion
tomato
Ag-nanoparticles
HR-SEM
TEM
title Bioprospects of Endophytic Bacteria in Plant Growth Promotion and Ag-Nanoparticle Biosynthesis
title_full Bioprospects of Endophytic Bacteria in Plant Growth Promotion and Ag-Nanoparticle Biosynthesis
title_fullStr Bioprospects of Endophytic Bacteria in Plant Growth Promotion and Ag-Nanoparticle Biosynthesis
title_full_unstemmed Bioprospects of Endophytic Bacteria in Plant Growth Promotion and Ag-Nanoparticle Biosynthesis
title_short Bioprospects of Endophytic Bacteria in Plant Growth Promotion and Ag-Nanoparticle Biosynthesis
title_sort bioprospects of endophytic bacteria in plant growth promotion and ag nanoparticle biosynthesis
topic endophytic bacteria
plant growth promotion
tomato
Ag-nanoparticles
HR-SEM
TEM
url https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/14/1787
work_keys_str_mv AT monikasingh bioprospectsofendophyticbacteriainplantgrowthpromotionandagnanoparticlebiosynthesis
AT kamalaqureshi bioprospectsofendophyticbacteriainplantgrowthpromotionandagnanoparticlebiosynthesis
AT mariuszjaremko bioprospectsofendophyticbacteriainplantgrowthpromotionandagnanoparticlebiosynthesis
AT minakshirajput bioprospectsofendophyticbacteriainplantgrowthpromotionandagnanoparticlebiosynthesis
AT sandeepkumarsingh bioprospectsofendophyticbacteriainplantgrowthpromotionandagnanoparticlebiosynthesis
AT kaushalendra bioprospectsofendophyticbacteriainplantgrowthpromotionandagnanoparticlebiosynthesis
AT kapildpandey bioprospectsofendophyticbacteriainplantgrowthpromotionandagnanoparticlebiosynthesis
AT luizfernandoromanholoferreira bioprospectsofendophyticbacteriainplantgrowthpromotionandagnanoparticlebiosynthesis
AT ajaykumar bioprospectsofendophyticbacteriainplantgrowthpromotionandagnanoparticlebiosynthesis