What Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian Constitution
The question should perhaps be “what went right?”. I argue that for more than 30 years, as a result of a key provision in the Constitution, and the work of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (CCRF) there were many positive changes to Russian law and practice. These advances were only...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
2024-02-01
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/what-went-wrong-and-what-could-be-done/ |
| Summary: | The question should perhaps be “what went right?”. I argue that for more than 30 years, as a result of a key provision in the Constitution, and the work of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (CCRF) there were many positive changes to Russian law and practice. These advances were only possible as a result of Russia’s membership of the Council of Europe and ratification of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). But that chapter in Russia’s constitutional history has been closed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2366-7044 |