What Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian Constitution
The question should perhaps be “what went right?”. I argue that for more than 30 years, as a result of a key provision in the Constitution, and the work of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (CCRF) there were many positive changes to Russian law and practice. These advances were only...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
2024-02-01
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/what-went-wrong-and-what-could-be-done/ |
| _version_ | 1797316973167640576 |
|---|---|
| author | Bill Bowring |
| author_facet | Bill Bowring |
| author_sort | Bill Bowring |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The question should perhaps be “what went right?”. I argue that for more than 30 years, as a result of a key provision in the Constitution, and the work of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (CCRF) there were many positive changes to Russian law and practice. These advances were only possible as a result of Russia’s membership of the Council of Europe and ratification of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). But that chapter in Russia’s constitutional history has been closed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T03:28:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-317ca56018224c8ba1e95c2f4145002a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7044 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T03:28:09Z |
| publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
| publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verfassungsblog |
| spelling | doaj.art-317ca56018224c8ba1e95c2f4145002a2024-02-11T14:59:48ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442024-02-012366-704410.59704/2a3fea0a4d5379bdWhat Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian ConstitutionBill BowringThe question should perhaps be “what went right?”. I argue that for more than 30 years, as a result of a key provision in the Constitution, and the work of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (CCRF) there were many positive changes to Russian law and practice. These advances were only possible as a result of Russia’s membership of the Council of Europe and ratification of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). But that chapter in Russia’s constitutional history has been closed.https://verfassungsblog.de/what-went-wrong-and-what-could-be-done/ECHRRussian Constitutional CourtRusslandRussland |
| spellingShingle | Bill Bowring What Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian Constitution Verfassungsblog ECHR Russian Constitutional Court Russland Russland |
| title | What Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian Constitution |
| title_full | What Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian Constitution |
| title_fullStr | What Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian Constitution |
| title_full_unstemmed | What Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian Constitution |
| title_short | What Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian Constitution |
| title_sort | what went wrong and what could be done 30 years of the russian constitution |
| topic | ECHR Russian Constitutional Court Russland Russland |
| url | https://verfassungsblog.de/what-went-wrong-and-what-could-be-done/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT billbowring whatwentwrongandwhatcouldbedone30yearsoftherussianconstitution |