What Went Wrong and What Could be Done? - 30 Years of the Russian Constitution
The question should perhaps be “what went right?”. I argue that for more than 30 years, as a result of a key provision in the Constitution, and the work of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (CCRF) there were many positive changes to Russian law and practice. These advances were only...
Main Author: | Bill Bowring |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
2024-02-01
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/what-went-wrong-and-what-could-be-done/ |
Similar Items
-
Why the Russian Constitution Matters
by: William Partlett
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Can the Russian Constitution Still Strike Back? - Accountability and Justice in Russia After Putin
by: Nikolai Bobrinsky
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Legitimizing Authoritarian Transformation - Russia’s Constitutional Court and the Cost of Compromise
by: Olga Podoplelova
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Regime Adaptation Within Russia’s Judicial Elites - The Case of Valery Zorkin
by: Caroline von Gall
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Paving the Way for Violence - The Constitutional Crisis of 1993 and Russia’s Political Trajectory
by: Vladimir Gel’man
Published: (2024-02-01)