Improved Arctic sea ice thickness projections using bias-corrected CMIP5 simulations

Projections of Arctic sea ice thickness (SIT) have the potential to inform stakeholders about accessibility to the region, but are currently rather uncertain. The latest suite of CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) produce a wide range of simulated SIT in the historical period (1979–2014) and exhibit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Melia, K. Haines, E. Hawkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-12-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:http://www.the-cryosphere.net/9/2237/2015/tc-9-2237-2015.pdf
_version_ 1818205622651322368
author N. Melia
K. Haines
E. Hawkins
author_facet N. Melia
K. Haines
E. Hawkins
author_sort N. Melia
collection DOAJ
description Projections of Arctic sea ice thickness (SIT) have the potential to inform stakeholders about accessibility to the region, but are currently rather uncertain. The latest suite of CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) produce a wide range of simulated SIT in the historical period (1979–2014) and exhibit various biases when compared with the Pan-Arctic Ice–Ocean Modelling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS) sea ice reanalysis. We present a new method to constrain such GCM simulations of SIT via a statistical bias correction technique. The bias correction successfully constrains the spatial SIT distribution and temporal variability in the CMIP5 projections whilst retaining the climatic fluctuations from individual ensemble members. The bias correction acts to reduce the spread in projections of SIT and reveals the significant contributions of climate internal variability in the first half of the century and of scenario uncertainty from the mid-century onwards. The projected date of ice-free conditions in the Arctic under the RCP8.5 high emission scenario occurs in the 2050s, which is a decade earlier than without the bias correction, with potentially significant implications for stakeholders in the Arctic such as the shipping industry. The bias correction methodology developed could be similarly applied to other variables to reduce spread in climate projections more generally.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T04:00:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-317dc9f3d8474ed5810f34787bcdb016
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T04:00:04Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The Cryosphere
spelling doaj.art-317dc9f3d8474ed5810f34787bcdb0162022-12-22T00:39:05ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242015-12-01962237225110.5194/tc-9-2237-2015Improved Arctic sea ice thickness projections using bias-corrected CMIP5 simulationsN. Melia0K. Haines1E. Hawkins2Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UKNational Centre for Earth Observation, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UKNCAS-Climate, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UKProjections of Arctic sea ice thickness (SIT) have the potential to inform stakeholders about accessibility to the region, but are currently rather uncertain. The latest suite of CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) produce a wide range of simulated SIT in the historical period (1979–2014) and exhibit various biases when compared with the Pan-Arctic Ice–Ocean Modelling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS) sea ice reanalysis. We present a new method to constrain such GCM simulations of SIT via a statistical bias correction technique. The bias correction successfully constrains the spatial SIT distribution and temporal variability in the CMIP5 projections whilst retaining the climatic fluctuations from individual ensemble members. The bias correction acts to reduce the spread in projections of SIT and reveals the significant contributions of climate internal variability in the first half of the century and of scenario uncertainty from the mid-century onwards. The projected date of ice-free conditions in the Arctic under the RCP8.5 high emission scenario occurs in the 2050s, which is a decade earlier than without the bias correction, with potentially significant implications for stakeholders in the Arctic such as the shipping industry. The bias correction methodology developed could be similarly applied to other variables to reduce spread in climate projections more generally.http://www.the-cryosphere.net/9/2237/2015/tc-9-2237-2015.pdf
spellingShingle N. Melia
K. Haines
E. Hawkins
Improved Arctic sea ice thickness projections using bias-corrected CMIP5 simulations
The Cryosphere
title Improved Arctic sea ice thickness projections using bias-corrected CMIP5 simulations
title_full Improved Arctic sea ice thickness projections using bias-corrected CMIP5 simulations
title_fullStr Improved Arctic sea ice thickness projections using bias-corrected CMIP5 simulations
title_full_unstemmed Improved Arctic sea ice thickness projections using bias-corrected CMIP5 simulations
title_short Improved Arctic sea ice thickness projections using bias-corrected CMIP5 simulations
title_sort improved arctic sea ice thickness projections using bias corrected cmip5 simulations
url http://www.the-cryosphere.net/9/2237/2015/tc-9-2237-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nmelia improvedarcticseaicethicknessprojectionsusingbiascorrectedcmip5simulations
AT khaines improvedarcticseaicethicknessprojectionsusingbiascorrectedcmip5simulations
AT ehawkins improvedarcticseaicethicknessprojectionsusingbiascorrectedcmip5simulations