Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Serum Neutralizing Antibody to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus

Lactogenic immunity is important for the protection of piglets against many pathogens including porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Circulating neutralizing antibodies levels in sow sera may help determine if a detectable immune response could confer protection to piglets. Neutralizing antibodies can b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justin Brown, Korakrit Poonsuk, Ting-Yu Cheng, Chris Rademacher, Erin Kalkwarf, Liying Tian, Lauren A. McKeen, Chong Wang, Luis Gimenez-Lirola, David Baum, Locke A. Karriker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/4/757
_version_ 1797622758990938112
author Justin Brown
Korakrit Poonsuk
Ting-Yu Cheng
Chris Rademacher
Erin Kalkwarf
Liying Tian
Lauren A. McKeen
Chong Wang
Luis Gimenez-Lirola
David Baum
Locke A. Karriker
author_facet Justin Brown
Korakrit Poonsuk
Ting-Yu Cheng
Chris Rademacher
Erin Kalkwarf
Liying Tian
Lauren A. McKeen
Chong Wang
Luis Gimenez-Lirola
David Baum
Locke A. Karriker
author_sort Justin Brown
collection DOAJ
description Lactogenic immunity is important for the protection of piglets against many pathogens including porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Circulating neutralizing antibodies levels in sow sera may help determine if a detectable immune response could confer protection to piglets. Neutralizing antibodies can be detected through various diagnostic assays. This study evaluated the diagnostic characteristics of two neutralizing antibody assays for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus neutralizing antibodies in serum of challenged gilts. Four treatment groups, control, non-vaccinated, vaccinated prior to challenge, and vaccinated following challenge, were comprised of 20 gilts. Serum sample were collected from each gilt prior to and following challenge with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Samples were evaluated for the presence of neutralizing antibodies via a fluorescent focus neutralization assay and a high-throughput neutralization assay. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the fluorescent focus neutralization and high-throughput neutralization assays for this study were optimized at a cutoff of a dilution of 80 and 80% fluorescent reduction respectively and demonstrated moderate agreement based off the kappa statistic. The focus fluorescent neutralization and high-throughput neutralization assays can be used to monitor the status of neutralizing antibodies within animals or a population of animals. The high-throughput assay has advantages over the focus fluorescent assay in that it has a higher specificity at the indicated cut-off and the nature of the results allows for more discrimination between individual results.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T09:15:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-31818917f418415a83f447e9b11404a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T09:15:47Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-31818917f418415a83f447e9b11404a82023-11-16T18:41:10ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152023-02-0113475710.3390/ani13040757Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Serum Neutralizing Antibody to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea VirusJustin Brown0Korakrit Poonsuk1Ting-Yu Cheng2Chris Rademacher3Erin Kalkwarf4Liying Tian5Lauren A. McKeen6Chong Wang7Luis Gimenez-Lirola8David Baum9Locke A. Karriker10Swine Medicine Education Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USANebraska Veterinary Diagnostic Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USAVeterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USAVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USAVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USAVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USADepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, 1121 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USADepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, 1121 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USAVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USAVeterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USASwine Medicine Education Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USALactogenic immunity is important for the protection of piglets against many pathogens including porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Circulating neutralizing antibodies levels in sow sera may help determine if a detectable immune response could confer protection to piglets. Neutralizing antibodies can be detected through various diagnostic assays. This study evaluated the diagnostic characteristics of two neutralizing antibody assays for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus neutralizing antibodies in serum of challenged gilts. Four treatment groups, control, non-vaccinated, vaccinated prior to challenge, and vaccinated following challenge, were comprised of 20 gilts. Serum sample were collected from each gilt prior to and following challenge with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Samples were evaluated for the presence of neutralizing antibodies via a fluorescent focus neutralization assay and a high-throughput neutralization assay. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the fluorescent focus neutralization and high-throughput neutralization assays for this study were optimized at a cutoff of a dilution of 80 and 80% fluorescent reduction respectively and demonstrated moderate agreement based off the kappa statistic. The focus fluorescent neutralization and high-throughput neutralization assays can be used to monitor the status of neutralizing antibodies within animals or a population of animals. The high-throughput assay has advantages over the focus fluorescent assay in that it has a higher specificity at the indicated cut-off and the nature of the results allows for more discrimination between individual results.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/4/757PEDVneutralizing antibodydiagnostic assay
spellingShingle Justin Brown
Korakrit Poonsuk
Ting-Yu Cheng
Chris Rademacher
Erin Kalkwarf
Liying Tian
Lauren A. McKeen
Chong Wang
Luis Gimenez-Lirola
David Baum
Locke A. Karriker
Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Serum Neutralizing Antibody to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus
Animals
PEDV
neutralizing antibody
diagnostic assay
title Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Serum Neutralizing Antibody to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus
title_full Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Serum Neutralizing Antibody to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Serum Neutralizing Antibody to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Serum Neutralizing Antibody to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus
title_short Comparison of Two Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Serum Neutralizing Antibody to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus
title_sort comparison of two diagnostic assays for the detection of serum neutralizing antibody to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus
topic PEDV
neutralizing antibody
diagnostic assay
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/4/757
work_keys_str_mv AT justinbrown comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus
AT korakritpoonsuk comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus
AT tingyucheng comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus
AT chrisrademacher comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus
AT erinkalkwarf comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus
AT liyingtian comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus
AT laurenamckeen comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus
AT chongwang comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus
AT luisgimenezlirola comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus
AT davidbaum comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus
AT lockeakarriker comparisonoftwodiagnosticassaysforthedetectionofserumneutralizingantibodytoporcineepidemicdiarrheavirus