Impact of Rumen Fluid Storage on In Vitro Feed Fermentation Characteristics

Storing rumen fluid (RF) has the potential to standardize subsequent in vitro feed fermentation studies. The first phase of this experiment aimed to evaluate the effect of two RF storage methods on gas composition and dry matter disappearance (DMD) in wheat grain and lucerne hay under in vitro ferme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bereket Zeleke Tunkala, Kristy DiGiacomo, Pablo S. Alvarez Hess, Frank R. Dunshea, Brian J. Leury
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Fermentation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5637/9/4/392
_version_ 1797605492313292800
author Bereket Zeleke Tunkala
Kristy DiGiacomo
Pablo S. Alvarez Hess
Frank R. Dunshea
Brian J. Leury
author_facet Bereket Zeleke Tunkala
Kristy DiGiacomo
Pablo S. Alvarez Hess
Frank R. Dunshea
Brian J. Leury
author_sort Bereket Zeleke Tunkala
collection DOAJ
description Storing rumen fluid (RF) has the potential to standardize subsequent in vitro feed fermentation studies. The first phase of this experiment aimed to evaluate the effect of two RF storage methods on gas composition and dry matter disappearance (DMD) in wheat grain and lucerne hay under in vitro fermentation. The storage methods were as follows: (1) snap-freezing RF using liquid nitrogen and then storing it at −80 °C (−80 °C); and (2) mixing RF with 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), subsequently freezing it at −20 °C (D−20 °C), and comparing it to fresh RF on days 1, 14, and 30 post collection. The objective of the second phase was to quantify the impact of preserving the RF for 180 days at D−20 °C on the in vitro fermentation parameters. The methane composition was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in both the preserved RFs than in the fresh RF. There was no difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in DMD values between days 14 and 30. The average cumulative gas production and DMD from the RF stored at D−20 °C was higher than that from the RF stored at −80 °C. Moreover, there was no difference between day 30 and day 180 in the total gas production and lag time when fermenting with RF preserved at D−20 °C. Therefore, storing RF at D−20 °C is preferable to storing it at −80 °C when access to fresh RF is limited.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T05:01:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3183145e27d7426381d3222d95ca66ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-5637
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T05:01:52Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Fermentation
spelling doaj.art-3183145e27d7426381d3222d95ca66ef2023-11-17T19:11:16ZengMDPI AGFermentation2311-56372023-04-019439210.3390/fermentation9040392Impact of Rumen Fluid Storage on In Vitro Feed Fermentation CharacteristicsBereket Zeleke Tunkala0Kristy DiGiacomo1Pablo S. Alvarez Hess2Frank R. Dunshea3Brian J. Leury4Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaFaculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaAgriculture Victoria Research, 1301 Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank, VIC 3821, AustraliaFaculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaFaculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, AustraliaStoring rumen fluid (RF) has the potential to standardize subsequent in vitro feed fermentation studies. The first phase of this experiment aimed to evaluate the effect of two RF storage methods on gas composition and dry matter disappearance (DMD) in wheat grain and lucerne hay under in vitro fermentation. The storage methods were as follows: (1) snap-freezing RF using liquid nitrogen and then storing it at −80 °C (−80 °C); and (2) mixing RF with 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), subsequently freezing it at −20 °C (D−20 °C), and comparing it to fresh RF on days 1, 14, and 30 post collection. The objective of the second phase was to quantify the impact of preserving the RF for 180 days at D−20 °C on the in vitro fermentation parameters. The methane composition was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in both the preserved RFs than in the fresh RF. There was no difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in DMD values between days 14 and 30. The average cumulative gas production and DMD from the RF stored at D−20 °C was higher than that from the RF stored at −80 °C. Moreover, there was no difference between day 30 and day 180 in the total gas production and lag time when fermenting with RF preserved at D−20 °C. Therefore, storing RF at D−20 °C is preferable to storing it at −80 °C when access to fresh RF is limited.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5637/9/4/392preservationgas productionmethanedry matter disappearancevolatile fatty acids
spellingShingle Bereket Zeleke Tunkala
Kristy DiGiacomo
Pablo S. Alvarez Hess
Frank R. Dunshea
Brian J. Leury
Impact of Rumen Fluid Storage on In Vitro Feed Fermentation Characteristics
Fermentation
preservation
gas production
methane
dry matter disappearance
volatile fatty acids
title Impact of Rumen Fluid Storage on In Vitro Feed Fermentation Characteristics
title_full Impact of Rumen Fluid Storage on In Vitro Feed Fermentation Characteristics
title_fullStr Impact of Rumen Fluid Storage on In Vitro Feed Fermentation Characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Rumen Fluid Storage on In Vitro Feed Fermentation Characteristics
title_short Impact of Rumen Fluid Storage on In Vitro Feed Fermentation Characteristics
title_sort impact of rumen fluid storage on in vitro feed fermentation characteristics
topic preservation
gas production
methane
dry matter disappearance
volatile fatty acids
url https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5637/9/4/392
work_keys_str_mv AT bereketzeleketunkala impactofrumenfluidstorageoninvitrofeedfermentationcharacteristics
AT kristydigiacomo impactofrumenfluidstorageoninvitrofeedfermentationcharacteristics
AT pablosalvarezhess impactofrumenfluidstorageoninvitrofeedfermentationcharacteristics
AT frankrdunshea impactofrumenfluidstorageoninvitrofeedfermentationcharacteristics
AT brianjleury impactofrumenfluidstorageoninvitrofeedfermentationcharacteristics