Comparison between Methods for Estimating Length of G.V.F. Curves in Mild Circular Open Channel with Experimental Length

Abstract- A gradually varied flow computation is important for the design of water structures. To design dimensions of channels, examining the depth of water in a gradually varied flow is required. In this study, experiments study were performed to evaluate different methods for calculating the leng...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amal Naeem, Ebrahim Rashwan, Mossad Khadr
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Faculty of engineering, Tanta University 2021-12-01
Series:Journal of Engineering Research - Egypt
Subjects:
Online Access:https://erjeng.journals.ekb.eg/article_204400_e42717864908784a6957f5ed5b3b4244.pdf
_version_ 1797799131558707200
author Amal Naeem
Ebrahim Rashwan
Mossad Khadr
author_facet Amal Naeem
Ebrahim Rashwan
Mossad Khadr
author_sort Amal Naeem
collection DOAJ
description Abstract- A gradually varied flow computation is important for the design of water structures. To design dimensions of channels, examining the depth of water in a gradually varied flow is required. In this study, experiments study were performed to evaluate different methods for calculating the lengths of gradually varied flow curves in mild slope circular open channel. The study was performed in a circular flume with an inner diameter equal to 24.40 cm with a mild slope equal to 0.00083 for different discharges from 2.38 l/sec to 14.08 l/sec. The objective of this study is to compare water surface profiles resulting from experimental measurements with the water surface profiles computed from graphical integration method), direct step method, and Runge-Kutta method for two gradually varied flow curves M3 and M2. The graphical integration method has a minimum percentage error of -0.18% and a maximum of -8.68% for M3 curves, while it has a minimum percentage error of 0.78% and a maximum of 8.37% for M2 curves. The direct step method has a minimum percentage error of 0.04% and a maximum of 9.34% for M3 curves while having a minimum percentage error of 0.91% and a maximum of 8.25 for curves M2 curves. For the Runge-Kutta method, the maximum error in water surface for all runs is -5.00% for M3 curves and 1.95% for M2 curves. The Runge-Kutta method perfectly fits in the circular channels.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:14:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3189bc8c651d4d2f975ea0ce5a85463d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2356-9441
2735-4873
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:14:22Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Faculty of engineering, Tanta University
record_format Article
series Journal of Engineering Research - Egypt
spelling doaj.art-3189bc8c651d4d2f975ea0ce5a85463d2023-06-21T06:47:12ZaraFaculty of engineering, Tanta UniversityJournal of Engineering Research - Egypt2356-94412735-48732021-12-0154152410.21608/erjeng.2021.104696.1038204400Comparison between Methods for Estimating Length of G.V.F. Curves in Mild Circular Open Channel with Experimental LengthAmal Naeem0Ebrahim Rashwan1Mossad Khadr2Department of hydraulic and irrigation, faculty of engineering, Tanta university, Tanta, EgyptProfessor of Irrigation & Hydraulics EngineeringCollege of Engineering, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia, Department of Irrigation and Hydraulics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt,Abstract- A gradually varied flow computation is important for the design of water structures. To design dimensions of channels, examining the depth of water in a gradually varied flow is required. In this study, experiments study were performed to evaluate different methods for calculating the lengths of gradually varied flow curves in mild slope circular open channel. The study was performed in a circular flume with an inner diameter equal to 24.40 cm with a mild slope equal to 0.00083 for different discharges from 2.38 l/sec to 14.08 l/sec. The objective of this study is to compare water surface profiles resulting from experimental measurements with the water surface profiles computed from graphical integration method), direct step method, and Runge-Kutta method for two gradually varied flow curves M3 and M2. The graphical integration method has a minimum percentage error of -0.18% and a maximum of -8.68% for M3 curves, while it has a minimum percentage error of 0.78% and a maximum of 8.37% for M2 curves. The direct step method has a minimum percentage error of 0.04% and a maximum of 9.34% for M3 curves while having a minimum percentage error of 0.91% and a maximum of 8.25 for curves M2 curves. For the Runge-Kutta method, the maximum error in water surface for all runs is -5.00% for M3 curves and 1.95% for M2 curves. The Runge-Kutta method perfectly fits in the circular channels.https://erjeng.journals.ekb.eg/article_204400_e42717864908784a6957f5ed5b3b4244.pdfgradually varied flowcircular channelmild slopecomputation flow profilerunge-kutta method
spellingShingle Amal Naeem
Ebrahim Rashwan
Mossad Khadr
Comparison between Methods for Estimating Length of G.V.F. Curves in Mild Circular Open Channel with Experimental Length
Journal of Engineering Research - Egypt
gradually varied flow
circular channel
mild slope
computation flow profile
runge-kutta method
title Comparison between Methods for Estimating Length of G.V.F. Curves in Mild Circular Open Channel with Experimental Length
title_full Comparison between Methods for Estimating Length of G.V.F. Curves in Mild Circular Open Channel with Experimental Length
title_fullStr Comparison between Methods for Estimating Length of G.V.F. Curves in Mild Circular Open Channel with Experimental Length
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Methods for Estimating Length of G.V.F. Curves in Mild Circular Open Channel with Experimental Length
title_short Comparison between Methods for Estimating Length of G.V.F. Curves in Mild Circular Open Channel with Experimental Length
title_sort comparison between methods for estimating length of g v f curves in mild circular open channel with experimental length
topic gradually varied flow
circular channel
mild slope
computation flow profile
runge-kutta method
url https://erjeng.journals.ekb.eg/article_204400_e42717864908784a6957f5ed5b3b4244.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT amalnaeem comparisonbetweenmethodsforestimatinglengthofgvfcurvesinmildcircularopenchannelwithexperimentallength
AT ebrahimrashwan comparisonbetweenmethodsforestimatinglengthofgvfcurvesinmildcircularopenchannelwithexperimentallength
AT mossadkhadr comparisonbetweenmethodsforestimatinglengthofgvfcurvesinmildcircularopenchannelwithexperimentallength