Unmet Needs in Managing Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Malignancy

Patients with cancer face a high short-term risk of arterial thromboembolism. One of the most fatal manifestations of arterial thromboembolism is myocardial infarction (MI), and patients with cancer face a 3-fold greater risk of MI than patients without cancer. The individual risk for arterial throm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taku Inohara, Ayaka Endo, Chiara Melloni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00057/full
_version_ 1828764380443967488
author Taku Inohara
Taku Inohara
Ayaka Endo
Ayaka Endo
Chiara Melloni
author_facet Taku Inohara
Taku Inohara
Ayaka Endo
Ayaka Endo
Chiara Melloni
author_sort Taku Inohara
collection DOAJ
description Patients with cancer face a high short-term risk of arterial thromboembolism. One of the most fatal manifestations of arterial thromboembolism is myocardial infarction (MI), and patients with cancer face a 3-fold greater risk of MI than patients without cancer. The individual risk for arterial thrombotic events in patients with cancer is determined by the complex interaction of baseline cardiovascular risk factors, cancer type and stage, chemotherapeutic regimen, and other general contributing factors for thrombosis. Managing MI in patients with cancer is a clinical challenge, particularly due to cancer's unique pathophysiology, which makes it difficult to balance thrombotic and bleeding risks in this specific patient population. When patients with cancer present with MI, a limited proportion are treated with guideline-recommended therapy, such as antiplatelet therapy or invasive revascularization. Despite the limited evidence, existing reports consistently suggest similar clinical benefits of guideline-recommended therapy when administered to patients with cancer presenting with MI. In this review, we briefly summarize the available evidence, clinical challenges, and future perspectives on simultaneous management of MI and cancer, with a focus on invasive strategy.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T02:20:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-31a8b3ac8feb4952a1d22c8e8c4c1610
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T02:20:48Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-31a8b3ac8feb4952a1d22c8e8c4c16102022-12-22T01:24:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2019-05-01610.3389/fcvm.2019.00057440112Unmet Needs in Managing Myocardial Infarction in Patients With MalignancyTaku Inohara0Taku Inohara1Ayaka Endo2Ayaka Endo3Chiara Melloni4Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, JapanDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United StatesPatients with cancer face a high short-term risk of arterial thromboembolism. One of the most fatal manifestations of arterial thromboembolism is myocardial infarction (MI), and patients with cancer face a 3-fold greater risk of MI than patients without cancer. The individual risk for arterial thrombotic events in patients with cancer is determined by the complex interaction of baseline cardiovascular risk factors, cancer type and stage, chemotherapeutic regimen, and other general contributing factors for thrombosis. Managing MI in patients with cancer is a clinical challenge, particularly due to cancer's unique pathophysiology, which makes it difficult to balance thrombotic and bleeding risks in this specific patient population. When patients with cancer present with MI, a limited proportion are treated with guideline-recommended therapy, such as antiplatelet therapy or invasive revascularization. Despite the limited evidence, existing reports consistently suggest similar clinical benefits of guideline-recommended therapy when administered to patients with cancer presenting with MI. In this review, we briefly summarize the available evidence, clinical challenges, and future perspectives on simultaneous management of MI and cancer, with a focus on invasive strategy.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00057/fullmyocardial infarctioncancerarterial thrombosischemotherapyinvasive strategy
spellingShingle Taku Inohara
Taku Inohara
Ayaka Endo
Ayaka Endo
Chiara Melloni
Unmet Needs in Managing Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Malignancy
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
myocardial infarction
cancer
arterial thrombosis
chemotherapy
invasive strategy
title Unmet Needs in Managing Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Malignancy
title_full Unmet Needs in Managing Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Malignancy
title_fullStr Unmet Needs in Managing Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Malignancy
title_full_unstemmed Unmet Needs in Managing Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Malignancy
title_short Unmet Needs in Managing Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Malignancy
title_sort unmet needs in managing myocardial infarction in patients with malignancy
topic myocardial infarction
cancer
arterial thrombosis
chemotherapy
invasive strategy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00057/full
work_keys_str_mv AT takuinohara unmetneedsinmanagingmyocardialinfarctioninpatientswithmalignancy
AT takuinohara unmetneedsinmanagingmyocardialinfarctioninpatientswithmalignancy
AT ayakaendo unmetneedsinmanagingmyocardialinfarctioninpatientswithmalignancy
AT ayakaendo unmetneedsinmanagingmyocardialinfarctioninpatientswithmalignancy
AT chiaramelloni unmetneedsinmanagingmyocardialinfarctioninpatientswithmalignancy