Photovoltaic Energy Production Forecasting in a Short Term Horizon: Comparison between Analytical and Machine Learning Models

The existing trend towards increased penetration of renewable energies in the traditional grid, and the intermittent nature of the weather conditions on which these energy sources depend, make the development of tools for the forecasting of renewable energy production more necessary than ever. Likew...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garazi Etxegarai, Irati Zapirain, Haritza Camblong, Juanjo Ugartemendia, Juan Hernandez, Octavian Curea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/23/12171
Description
Summary:The existing trend towards increased penetration of renewable energies in the traditional grid, and the intermittent nature of the weather conditions on which these energy sources depend, make the development of tools for the forecasting of renewable energy production more necessary than ever. Likewise, the prediction of the energy generated in these renewable production plants is key to the implementation of efficient Energy Management Systems (EMS) in buildings. These will aim both to increase the energy efficiency of the building itself, as well as to encourage self-consumption or, where appropriate, collective self-consumption (CSC). This paper presents a comparison between four different models, the former one being an analytical model and the remaining three machine learning (ML) based models. All of them will forecast the photovoltaic (PV) production curve for the next day. In order to validate these models, a case study of a PV system installed on the roof of a university building located in Bidart (France) is proposed. The model that most accurately forecasts the PV production during the period of July 2021 is the support vector regression (SVR), which has a mean R<sup>2</sup> of 0.934 for July, being 0.97 on sunny days and 0.85 on cloudy ones. This is an improvement of 5.14%, 4.07%, and 4.18% over the nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous inputs (NARX), feedforward neural network (FFNN), and analytical model, respectively.
ISSN:2076-3417