Helping low-income smokers quit: findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing specialized quitline services with and without social needs navigationResearch in context

Summary: Background: Quitting smoking is especially challenging for low-income smokers due to high stress, high smoking prevalence around them, and limited support for quitting. This study aimed to determine whether any of three interventions designed specifically for low-income smokers would be mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew W. Kreuter, Rachel Garg, Qiang Fu, Charlene Caburnay, Tess Thompson, Christina Roberts, Dominique Sandheinrich, Irum Javed, Jennifer M. Wolff, Taylor Butler, Lauren M. Grimes, Kelly M. Carpenter, Robin Pokojski, Kristen Engelbrecht, Valerie Howard, Amy McQueen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-07-01
Series:The Lancet Regional Health. Americas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X23001035
_version_ 1797781842292637696
author Matthew W. Kreuter
Rachel Garg
Qiang Fu
Charlene Caburnay
Tess Thompson
Christina Roberts
Dominique Sandheinrich
Irum Javed
Jennifer M. Wolff
Taylor Butler
Lauren M. Grimes
Kelly M. Carpenter
Robin Pokojski
Kristen Engelbrecht
Valerie Howard
Amy McQueen
author_facet Matthew W. Kreuter
Rachel Garg
Qiang Fu
Charlene Caburnay
Tess Thompson
Christina Roberts
Dominique Sandheinrich
Irum Javed
Jennifer M. Wolff
Taylor Butler
Lauren M. Grimes
Kelly M. Carpenter
Robin Pokojski
Kristen Engelbrecht
Valerie Howard
Amy McQueen
author_sort Matthew W. Kreuter
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Background: Quitting smoking is especially challenging for low-income smokers due to high stress, high smoking prevalence around them, and limited support for quitting. This study aimed to determine whether any of three interventions designed specifically for low-income smokers would be more effective than standard tobacco quitline services: a specialized quitline, the specialized quitline with social needs navigation, or the standard quitline with social needs navigation. Methods: Using a randomized 2 × 2 factorial design, low-income daily cigarette smokers (n = 1944) in Missouri, USA who called a helpline seeking assistance with food, rent or other social needs were assigned to receive Standard Quitline alone (n = 485), Standard Quitline + Social Needs Navigation (n = 484), Specialized Quitline alone (n = 485), or Specialized Quitline + Social Needs Navigation (n = 490). The target sample size was 2000, 500 per group. The main outcome was 7-day self-reported point prevalence abstinence at 6-month follow-up. Multiple imputation was used to impute outcomes for those missing data at 6-month follow-up. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to assess differences between study groups. Findings: Participants were recruited from June 2017 to November 2020; most were African American (1111 [58%]) or White (666 [35%]), female (1396 [72%]), and reported <$10,000 (957 [51%]) or <$20,000 (1529 [82%]) annual pre-tax household income. At 6-month follow-up (58% retention), 101 participants in the Standard Quitline group reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (20.8% of those assigned at baseline, 38.1% after imputation). Quit rates in the Specialized Quitline (90 quitters, 18.6%, 38.1%) and Specialized Quitline + Social Needs Navigation (103 quitters, 21.0%, 39.8%) were not different from the Standard Quitline. Quit rates for Standard Quitline + Social Needs Navigation (74 quitters, 15.3%, 30.1%) were significantly lower than Standard Quitline (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.50–0.98). Interpretation: A specialized version of a state tobacco quitline was no more effective than standard quitline services in helping low-income smokers quit. Adding social needs navigation to a standard quitline decreased its effectiveness. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03194958. Funding: National Cancer Institute: R01CA201429.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:02:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-31bc93f844824eb3a72b53a60e993174
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-193X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:02:40Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series The Lancet Regional Health. Americas
spelling doaj.art-31bc93f844824eb3a72b53a60e9931742023-07-13T05:30:59ZengElsevierThe Lancet Regional Health. Americas2667-193X2023-07-0123100529Helping low-income smokers quit: findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing specialized quitline services with and without social needs navigationResearch in contextMatthew W. Kreuter0Rachel Garg1Qiang Fu2Charlene Caburnay3Tess Thompson4Christina Roberts5Dominique Sandheinrich6Irum Javed7Jennifer M. Wolff8Taylor Butler9Lauren M. Grimes10Kelly M. Carpenter11Robin Pokojski12Kristen Engelbrecht13Valerie Howard14Amy McQueen15Health Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Corresponding author. Health Communication Research Laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.Health Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USADepartment of Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USAHealth Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USAHealth Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USAHealth Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USAHealth Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USAHealth Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USAHealth Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USAHealth Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USAHealth Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USACenter for Wellbeing Research, OptumHealth, Seattle, WA, USACommunity Partnerships, United Way of Greater St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA211, United Way of Greater Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USATobacco Prevention and Control Program, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, MO, USAHealth Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USASummary: Background: Quitting smoking is especially challenging for low-income smokers due to high stress, high smoking prevalence around them, and limited support for quitting. This study aimed to determine whether any of three interventions designed specifically for low-income smokers would be more effective than standard tobacco quitline services: a specialized quitline, the specialized quitline with social needs navigation, or the standard quitline with social needs navigation. Methods: Using a randomized 2 × 2 factorial design, low-income daily cigarette smokers (n = 1944) in Missouri, USA who called a helpline seeking assistance with food, rent or other social needs were assigned to receive Standard Quitline alone (n = 485), Standard Quitline + Social Needs Navigation (n = 484), Specialized Quitline alone (n = 485), or Specialized Quitline + Social Needs Navigation (n = 490). The target sample size was 2000, 500 per group. The main outcome was 7-day self-reported point prevalence abstinence at 6-month follow-up. Multiple imputation was used to impute outcomes for those missing data at 6-month follow-up. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to assess differences between study groups. Findings: Participants were recruited from June 2017 to November 2020; most were African American (1111 [58%]) or White (666 [35%]), female (1396 [72%]), and reported <$10,000 (957 [51%]) or <$20,000 (1529 [82%]) annual pre-tax household income. At 6-month follow-up (58% retention), 101 participants in the Standard Quitline group reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (20.8% of those assigned at baseline, 38.1% after imputation). Quit rates in the Specialized Quitline (90 quitters, 18.6%, 38.1%) and Specialized Quitline + Social Needs Navigation (103 quitters, 21.0%, 39.8%) were not different from the Standard Quitline. Quit rates for Standard Quitline + Social Needs Navigation (74 quitters, 15.3%, 30.1%) were significantly lower than Standard Quitline (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.50–0.98). Interpretation: A specialized version of a state tobacco quitline was no more effective than standard quitline services in helping low-income smokers quit. Adding social needs navigation to a standard quitline decreased its effectiveness. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03194958. Funding: National Cancer Institute: R01CA201429.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X23001035SmokingCessationLow-incomeHealth disparitiesHealth equitySocial needs
spellingShingle Matthew W. Kreuter
Rachel Garg
Qiang Fu
Charlene Caburnay
Tess Thompson
Christina Roberts
Dominique Sandheinrich
Irum Javed
Jennifer M. Wolff
Taylor Butler
Lauren M. Grimes
Kelly M. Carpenter
Robin Pokojski
Kristen Engelbrecht
Valerie Howard
Amy McQueen
Helping low-income smokers quit: findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing specialized quitline services with and without social needs navigationResearch in context
The Lancet Regional Health. Americas
Smoking
Cessation
Low-income
Health disparities
Health equity
Social needs
title Helping low-income smokers quit: findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing specialized quitline services with and without social needs navigationResearch in context
title_full Helping low-income smokers quit: findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing specialized quitline services with and without social needs navigationResearch in context
title_fullStr Helping low-income smokers quit: findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing specialized quitline services with and without social needs navigationResearch in context
title_full_unstemmed Helping low-income smokers quit: findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing specialized quitline services with and without social needs navigationResearch in context
title_short Helping low-income smokers quit: findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing specialized quitline services with and without social needs navigationResearch in context
title_sort helping low income smokers quit findings from a randomized controlled trial comparing specialized quitline services with and without social needs navigationresearch in context
topic Smoking
Cessation
Low-income
Health disparities
Health equity
Social needs
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X23001035
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewwkreuter helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT rachelgarg helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT qiangfu helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT charlenecaburnay helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT tessthompson helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT christinaroberts helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT dominiquesandheinrich helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT irumjaved helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT jennifermwolff helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT taylorbutler helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT laurenmgrimes helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT kellymcarpenter helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT robinpokojski helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT kristenengelbrecht helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT valeriehoward helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext
AT amymcqueen helpinglowincomesmokersquitfindingsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingspecializedquitlineserviceswithandwithoutsocialneedsnavigationresearchincontext