Government Incentive Contracts for Microgrid Users

Tariff subsidies are beneficial to the further development of the microgrid market. In response to the reduction of the power generation costs of microgrids, the energy storage subsidy for microgrids has become a key factor affecting their further development. Therefore, it is essential to explore a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guanyi Yu, Qiang Lin, Xiaoqian Qi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/994
_version_ 1797396571604647936
author Guanyi Yu
Qiang Lin
Xiaoqian Qi
author_facet Guanyi Yu
Qiang Lin
Xiaoqian Qi
author_sort Guanyi Yu
collection DOAJ
description Tariff subsidies are beneficial to the further development of the microgrid market. In response to the reduction of the power generation costs of microgrids, the energy storage subsidy for microgrids has become a key factor affecting their further development. Therefore, it is essential to explore and establish a government subsidy mechanism for the energy storage price of microgrids. In this paper, we consider the incentive compatibility constraints and participation constraints of both the government and the microgrid energy storage subsidy. The cases of hidden information and no hidden information are investigated. A microgrid energy storage subsidy model of the incentive compatibility constraint was established to analyze the efficiency of the government subsidy and the microgrid energy storage in the “self-generation + energy storage” mode. The results show that there is an adverse selection problem between the government and energy storage subsidies for microgrid users. In the case of no hidden information, the government can sign different contracts with microgrid users according to their different energy storage efficiency levels. In the case of hidden information, it is better for the government to design a menu of different incentive contracts for microgrid users with different energy storage efficiencies. This approach can ensure that microgrid users with low energy storage efficiency continue to participate in the microgrid construction. Microgrid users with high energy storage efficiency can, thus, better control their costs related to the self-generation, self-use, and surplus electricity transmitted to the grid as well as better select high-regulation carbon dioxide emission reductions and their capacity generation.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:53:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-31c2c78dd2214f9f8ec8d5b4b726c1eb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T00:53:18Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-31c2c78dd2214f9f8ec8d5b4b726c1eb2023-12-11T17:02:00ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-02-0114499410.3390/en14040994Government Incentive Contracts for Microgrid UsersGuanyi Yu0Qiang Lin1Xiaoqian Qi2School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, ChinaCollege of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, ChinaSchool of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, ChinaTariff subsidies are beneficial to the further development of the microgrid market. In response to the reduction of the power generation costs of microgrids, the energy storage subsidy for microgrids has become a key factor affecting their further development. Therefore, it is essential to explore and establish a government subsidy mechanism for the energy storage price of microgrids. In this paper, we consider the incentive compatibility constraints and participation constraints of both the government and the microgrid energy storage subsidy. The cases of hidden information and no hidden information are investigated. A microgrid energy storage subsidy model of the incentive compatibility constraint was established to analyze the efficiency of the government subsidy and the microgrid energy storage in the “self-generation + energy storage” mode. The results show that there is an adverse selection problem between the government and energy storage subsidies for microgrid users. In the case of no hidden information, the government can sign different contracts with microgrid users according to their different energy storage efficiency levels. In the case of hidden information, it is better for the government to design a menu of different incentive contracts for microgrid users with different energy storage efficiencies. This approach can ensure that microgrid users with low energy storage efficiency continue to participate in the microgrid construction. Microgrid users with high energy storage efficiency can, thus, better control their costs related to the self-generation, self-use, and surplus electricity transmitted to the grid as well as better select high-regulation carbon dioxide emission reductions and their capacity generation.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/994governmentmicrogrid usersincentive contractshidden informationsubsidy
spellingShingle Guanyi Yu
Qiang Lin
Xiaoqian Qi
Government Incentive Contracts for Microgrid Users
Energies
government
microgrid users
incentive contracts
hidden information
subsidy
title Government Incentive Contracts for Microgrid Users
title_full Government Incentive Contracts for Microgrid Users
title_fullStr Government Incentive Contracts for Microgrid Users
title_full_unstemmed Government Incentive Contracts for Microgrid Users
title_short Government Incentive Contracts for Microgrid Users
title_sort government incentive contracts for microgrid users
topic government
microgrid users
incentive contracts
hidden information
subsidy
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/994
work_keys_str_mv AT guanyiyu governmentincentivecontractsformicrogridusers
AT qianglin governmentincentivecontractsformicrogridusers
AT xiaoqianqi governmentincentivecontractsformicrogridusers