New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making

Ninety-eight Australian students participated in a functional replication of a study published by Dijksterhuis et al. (2006). The results indicated that unconscious thought does not necessarily lead to better normative decision making performance than conscious thought, which is contrary to the resu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Felix Acker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2008-04-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm71128.pdf
_version_ 1797723025682989056
author Felix Acker
author_facet Felix Acker
author_sort Felix Acker
collection DOAJ
description Ninety-eight Australian students participated in a functional replication of a study published by Dijksterhuis et al. (2006). The results indicated that unconscious thought does not necessarily lead to better normative decision making performance than conscious thought, which is contrary to the results found in Dijksterhuis et al. Since other studies showed a positive, though statistically not significant, effect for unconscious thought, a meta-analysis comprising a total of 17 experiments was conducted. It suggests that there is little evidence for an advantage to normative decision making using unconscious thought. However, a discussion of potential moderators shows that further study would help to identify situations in which unconscious thought is truly helpful and those in which it is not.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:57:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-31d062bfb1e54751a1fc285755c17c12
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:57:13Z
publishDate 2008-04-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-31d062bfb1e54751a1fc285755c17c122023-09-02T12:04:15ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752008-04-013NA292303New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision makingFelix AckerNinety-eight Australian students participated in a functional replication of a study published by Dijksterhuis et al. (2006). The results indicated that unconscious thought does not necessarily lead to better normative decision making performance than conscious thought, which is contrary to the results found in Dijksterhuis et al. Since other studies showed a positive, though statistically not significant, effect for unconscious thought, a meta-analysis comprising a total of 17 experiments was conducted. It suggests that there is little evidence for an advantage to normative decision making using unconscious thought. However, a discussion of potential moderators shows that further study would help to identify situations in which unconscious thought is truly helpful and those in which it is not.http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm71128.pdfunconscious thoughtmeta-analysisnormative decision making.NAKeywords
spellingShingle Felix Acker
New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making
Judgment and Decision Making
unconscious thought
meta-analysis
normative decision making.NAKeywords
title New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making
title_full New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making
title_fullStr New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making
title_full_unstemmed New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making
title_short New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making
title_sort new findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making
topic unconscious thought
meta-analysis
normative decision making.NAKeywords
url http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm71128.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT felixacker newfindingsonunconsciousversusconsciousthoughtindecisionmaking