Ascribing Sentience: Evidential and Ethical Considerations in Policymaking

Deciding which animals are sentient is an important precursor for decisions about the application of animal welfare legislation, and the wider assessment of the impacts of policies on animal suffering. We ascribe sentience in order to inform decisions about how animals should be treated, and how the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James William Yeates
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/15/1893
_version_ 1797433028404838400
author James William Yeates
author_facet James William Yeates
author_sort James William Yeates
collection DOAJ
description Deciding which animals are sentient is an important precursor for decisions about the application of animal welfare legislation, and the wider assessment of the impacts of policies on animal suffering. We ascribe sentience in order to inform decisions about how animals should be treated, and how their treatment should be regulated. This ascription is both an ethical and an evidential process, and what evidence to use and require are ethical questions. Policymakers, therefore, cannot simply rely on scientific evidence in an ethically neutral way, but must be conscious of the ethical assumptions and positions underlying the process of ascription and its application in policy and law. As such, ethical principles that apply to policymaking apply to the ascription of sentience. This paper considers the implications of the Nolan principles for public service on the ascription of animals.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:10:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-31dd02fd82f4498d9b81c5dcee0fabf3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:10:13Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-31dd02fd82f4498d9b81c5dcee0fabf32023-12-01T22:48:15ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152022-07-011215189310.3390/ani12151893Ascribing Sentience: Evidential and Ethical Considerations in PolicymakingJames William Yeates0World Federation of Animals, Boston, MA 02130, USADeciding which animals are sentient is an important precursor for decisions about the application of animal welfare legislation, and the wider assessment of the impacts of policies on animal suffering. We ascribe sentience in order to inform decisions about how animals should be treated, and how their treatment should be regulated. This ascription is both an ethical and an evidential process, and what evidence to use and require are ethical questions. Policymakers, therefore, cannot simply rely on scientific evidence in an ethically neutral way, but must be conscious of the ethical assumptions and positions underlying the process of ascription and its application in policy and law. As such, ethical principles that apply to policymaking apply to the ascription of sentience. This paper considers the implications of the Nolan principles for public service on the ascription of animals.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/15/1893animal welfarecephalopoddecapodNolan principlespolicymakingsentience
spellingShingle James William Yeates
Ascribing Sentience: Evidential and Ethical Considerations in Policymaking
Animals
animal welfare
cephalopod
decapod
Nolan principles
policymaking
sentience
title Ascribing Sentience: Evidential and Ethical Considerations in Policymaking
title_full Ascribing Sentience: Evidential and Ethical Considerations in Policymaking
title_fullStr Ascribing Sentience: Evidential and Ethical Considerations in Policymaking
title_full_unstemmed Ascribing Sentience: Evidential and Ethical Considerations in Policymaking
title_short Ascribing Sentience: Evidential and Ethical Considerations in Policymaking
title_sort ascribing sentience evidential and ethical considerations in policymaking
topic animal welfare
cephalopod
decapod
Nolan principles
policymaking
sentience
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/15/1893
work_keys_str_mv AT jameswilliamyeates ascribingsentienceevidentialandethicalconsiderationsinpolicymaking