Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To assess heart failure therapies in diabetic patients with preserved as compared to impaired systolic ventricular function.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>3304 patients with heart failure from 9 different studies were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angermann Christiane E, Lüers Claus, Neumann Till, Stahrenberg Raoul, Richter Annette, Störk Stefan, Düngen Hans-Dirk, Wachter Rolf, Edelmann Frank, Mehrhof Felix, Gelbrich Götz, Pieske Burkert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-02-01
Series:Cardiovascular Diabetology
Online Access:http://www.cardiab.com/content/10/1/15
_version_ 1818525079730913280
author Angermann Christiane E
Lüers Claus
Neumann Till
Stahrenberg Raoul
Richter Annette
Störk Stefan
Düngen Hans-Dirk
Wachter Rolf
Edelmann Frank
Mehrhof Felix
Gelbrich Götz
Pieske Burkert
author_facet Angermann Christiane E
Lüers Claus
Neumann Till
Stahrenberg Raoul
Richter Annette
Störk Stefan
Düngen Hans-Dirk
Wachter Rolf
Edelmann Frank
Mehrhof Felix
Gelbrich Götz
Pieske Burkert
author_sort Angermann Christiane E
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To assess heart failure therapies in diabetic patients with preserved as compared to impaired systolic ventricular function.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>3304 patients with heart failure from 9 different studies were included (mean age 63 ± 14 years); out of these, 711 subjects had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥ 50%) and 994 patients in the whole cohort suffered from diabetes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The majority (>90%) of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (SHF) and diabetes were treated with an ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or with beta-blockers. By contrast, patients with diabetes and preserved ejection fraction (HFNEF) were less likely to receive these substance classes (p < 0.001) and had a worse blood pressure control (p < 0.001). In comparison to patients without diabetes, the probability to receive these therapies was increased in diabetic HFNEF patients (p < 0.001), but not in diabetic SHF patients. Aldosterone receptor blockers were given more often to diabetic patients with reduced ejection fraction (p < 0.001), and the presence and severity of diabetes decreased the probability to receive this substance class, irrespective of renal function.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Diabetic patients with HFNEF received less heart failure medication and showed a poorer control of blood pressure as compared to diabetic patients with SHF. SHF patients with diabetes were less likely to receive aldosterone receptor blocker therapy, irrespective of renal function.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T06:04:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-31e5974ca0514e6c8da2a71018a3361d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1475-2840
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T06:04:57Z
publishDate 2011-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Cardiovascular Diabetology
spelling doaj.art-31e5974ca0514e6c8da2a71018a3361d2022-12-22T01:18:20ZengBMCCardiovascular Diabetology1475-28402011-02-011011510.1186/1475-2840-10-15Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guidelineAngermann Christiane ELüers ClausNeumann TillStahrenberg RaoulRichter AnnetteStörk StefanDüngen Hans-DirkWachter RolfEdelmann FrankMehrhof FelixGelbrich GötzPieske Burkert<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To assess heart failure therapies in diabetic patients with preserved as compared to impaired systolic ventricular function.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>3304 patients with heart failure from 9 different studies were included (mean age 63 ± 14 years); out of these, 711 subjects had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥ 50%) and 994 patients in the whole cohort suffered from diabetes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The majority (>90%) of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (SHF) and diabetes were treated with an ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or with beta-blockers. By contrast, patients with diabetes and preserved ejection fraction (HFNEF) were less likely to receive these substance classes (p < 0.001) and had a worse blood pressure control (p < 0.001). In comparison to patients without diabetes, the probability to receive these therapies was increased in diabetic HFNEF patients (p < 0.001), but not in diabetic SHF patients. Aldosterone receptor blockers were given more often to diabetic patients with reduced ejection fraction (p < 0.001), and the presence and severity of diabetes decreased the probability to receive this substance class, irrespective of renal function.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Diabetic patients with HFNEF received less heart failure medication and showed a poorer control of blood pressure as compared to diabetic patients with SHF. SHF patients with diabetes were less likely to receive aldosterone receptor blocker therapy, irrespective of renal function.</p>http://www.cardiab.com/content/10/1/15
spellingShingle Angermann Christiane E
Lüers Claus
Neumann Till
Stahrenberg Raoul
Richter Annette
Störk Stefan
Düngen Hans-Dirk
Wachter Rolf
Edelmann Frank
Mehrhof Felix
Gelbrich Götz
Pieske Burkert
Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline
Cardiovascular Diabetology
title Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline
title_full Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline
title_fullStr Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline
title_full_unstemmed Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline
title_short Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline
title_sort heart failure therapy in diabetic patients comparison with the recent esc easd guideline
url http://www.cardiab.com/content/10/1/15
work_keys_str_mv AT angermannchristianee heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT luersclaus heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT neumanntill heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT stahrenbergraoul heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT richterannette heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT storkstefan heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT dungenhansdirk heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT wachterrolf heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT edelmannfrank heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT mehrhoffelix heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT gelbrichgotz heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline
AT pieskeburkert heartfailuretherapyindiabeticpatientscomparisonwiththerecentesceasdguideline