Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical nursing students using 360 degree evaluation. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study that conducted between September 2014 and February 2015, 28 students who were selected by census from those who were passing the last semester of the Nu...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Society of Medical Education
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Korean Journal of Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://kjme.kr/upload/pdf/kjme-2016-22.pdf |
_version_ | 1818570745633046528 |
---|---|
author | Tabandeh Sadeghi Marzeyeh Loripoor |
author_facet | Tabandeh Sadeghi Marzeyeh Loripoor |
author_sort | Tabandeh Sadeghi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical nursing students using 360 degree evaluation. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study that conducted between September 2014 and February 2015, 28 students who were selected by census from those who were passing the last semester of the Nursing BSc program in Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. Data collection tools included demographic questionnaire and students’ evaluation questionnaire, to evaluate “professional behavior” and “clinical skills” in pediatric ward. Every student got evaluated from clinical instructor, students, peers, clinical nurses, and children’s mothers’ point of view. Data analysis was done with descriptive and analytic statistics test including Pearson coefficient using SPSS version 18.0. Results: The evaluation mean scores were as following: students, 89.74±6.17; peers, 94.12±6.87; children’s mothers, 92.87±6.21; clinical instructor, 84.01±8.81; and the nurses, 94.87±6.35. The results showed a significant correlation between evaluation scores of peers, clinical instructor and self-evaluation (Pearson coefficient, p<0.001), but the correlation between the nurses’ evaluation score and that of the clinical instructor was not significant (Pearson coefficient, p=0.052). Conclusion: 360 Degree evaluation can provide additional useful information on student performance and evaluation of different perspectives of care. The use of this method is recommended for clinical evaluation of nursing students. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T13:45:57Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-31f800938cc94a639fb8108c1436b708 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2005-727X 2005-7288 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T13:45:57Z |
publishDate | 2016-06-01 |
publisher | Korean Society of Medical Education |
record_format | Article |
series | Korean Journal of Medical Education |
spelling | doaj.art-31f800938cc94a639fb8108c1436b7082022-12-21T22:59:19ZengKorean Society of Medical EducationKorean Journal of Medical Education2005-727X2005-72882016-06-0128219520010.3946/kjme.2016.221127Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in IranTabandeh Sadeghi0Marzeyeh Loripoor1 Pediatric Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran Midwifery and Reproductive Health Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, IranPurpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical nursing students using 360 degree evaluation. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study that conducted between September 2014 and February 2015, 28 students who were selected by census from those who were passing the last semester of the Nursing BSc program in Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. Data collection tools included demographic questionnaire and students’ evaluation questionnaire, to evaluate “professional behavior” and “clinical skills” in pediatric ward. Every student got evaluated from clinical instructor, students, peers, clinical nurses, and children’s mothers’ point of view. Data analysis was done with descriptive and analytic statistics test including Pearson coefficient using SPSS version 18.0. Results: The evaluation mean scores were as following: students, 89.74±6.17; peers, 94.12±6.87; children’s mothers, 92.87±6.21; clinical instructor, 84.01±8.81; and the nurses, 94.87±6.35. The results showed a significant correlation between evaluation scores of peers, clinical instructor and self-evaluation (Pearson coefficient, p<0.001), but the correlation between the nurses’ evaluation score and that of the clinical instructor was not significant (Pearson coefficient, p=0.052). Conclusion: 360 Degree evaluation can provide additional useful information on student performance and evaluation of different perspectives of care. The use of this method is recommended for clinical evaluation of nursing students.http://kjme.kr/upload/pdf/kjme-2016-22.pdfClinical competenceCross-sectional studiesIranSelf-assessmentSurveys and questionnaires |
spellingShingle | Tabandeh Sadeghi Marzeyeh Loripoor Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran Korean Journal of Medical Education Clinical competence Cross-sectional studies Iran Self-assessment Surveys and questionnaires |
title | Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran |
title_full | Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran |
title_fullStr | Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran |
title_full_unstemmed | Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran |
title_short | Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran |
title_sort | usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in iran |
topic | Clinical competence Cross-sectional studies Iran Self-assessment Surveys and questionnaires |
url | http://kjme.kr/upload/pdf/kjme-2016-22.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tabandehsadeghi usefulnessof360degreeevaluationinevaluatingnursingstudentsiniran AT marzeyehloripoor usefulnessof360degreeevaluationinevaluatingnursingstudentsiniran |