A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite Materials
Modeling the interrelationships between the input parameters and outputs (responses) in any machining processes is essential to understand the process behavior and material removal mechanism. The developed models can also act as effective prediction tools in envisaging the tentative values of the re...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-11-01
|
| Series: | Materials |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6689 |
| _version_ | 1797512134997835776 |
|---|---|
| author | Shibaprasad Bhattacharya Kanak Kalita Robert Čep Shankar Chakraborty |
| author_facet | Shibaprasad Bhattacharya Kanak Kalita Robert Čep Shankar Chakraborty |
| author_sort | Shibaprasad Bhattacharya |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Modeling the interrelationships between the input parameters and outputs (responses) in any machining processes is essential to understand the process behavior and material removal mechanism. The developed models can also act as effective prediction tools in envisaging the tentative values of the responses for given sets of input parameters. In this paper, the application potentialities of nine different regression models, such as linear regression (LR), polynomial regression (PR), support vector regression (SVR), principal component regression (PCR), quantile regression, median regression, ridge regression, lasso regression and elastic net regression are explored in accurately predicting response values during turning and drilling operations of composite materials. Their prediction performance is also contrasted using four statistical metrics, i.e., mean absolute percentage error, root mean squared percentage error, root mean squared logarithmic error and root relative squared error. Based on the lower values of those metrics and Friedman rank and aligned rank tests, SVR emerges out as the best performing model, whereas the prediction performance of median regression is worst. The results of the Wilcoxon test based on the drilling dataset identify the existence of statistically significant differences between the performances of LR and PCR, and PR and median regression models. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T05:56:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-31f9b72c15a04073895838be3d6df592 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1996-1944 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T05:56:36Z |
| publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Materials |
| spelling | doaj.art-31f9b72c15a04073895838be3d6df5922023-11-22T21:15:59ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-11-011421668910.3390/ma14216689A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite MaterialsShibaprasad Bhattacharya0Kanak Kalita1Robert Čep2Shankar Chakraborty3Department of Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700030, IndiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi 600062, IndiaDepartment of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech RepublicDepartment of Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700030, IndiaModeling the interrelationships between the input parameters and outputs (responses) in any machining processes is essential to understand the process behavior and material removal mechanism. The developed models can also act as effective prediction tools in envisaging the tentative values of the responses for given sets of input parameters. In this paper, the application potentialities of nine different regression models, such as linear regression (LR), polynomial regression (PR), support vector regression (SVR), principal component regression (PCR), quantile regression, median regression, ridge regression, lasso regression and elastic net regression are explored in accurately predicting response values during turning and drilling operations of composite materials. Their prediction performance is also contrasted using four statistical metrics, i.e., mean absolute percentage error, root mean squared percentage error, root mean squared logarithmic error and root relative squared error. Based on the lower values of those metrics and Friedman rank and aligned rank tests, SVR emerges out as the best performing model, whereas the prediction performance of median regression is worst. The results of the Wilcoxon test based on the drilling dataset identify the existence of statistically significant differences between the performances of LR and PCR, and PR and median regression models.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6689regressionmodelturningdrillingcomposite material |
| spellingShingle | Shibaprasad Bhattacharya Kanak Kalita Robert Čep Shankar Chakraborty A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite Materials Materials regression model turning drilling composite material |
| title | A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite Materials |
| title_full | A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite Materials |
| title_fullStr | A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite Materials |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite Materials |
| title_short | A Comparative Analysis on Prediction Performance of Regression Models during Machining of Composite Materials |
| title_sort | comparative analysis on prediction performance of regression models during machining of composite materials |
| topic | regression model turning drilling composite material |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6689 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shibaprasadbhattacharya acomparativeanalysisonpredictionperformanceofregressionmodelsduringmachiningofcompositematerials AT kanakkalita acomparativeanalysisonpredictionperformanceofregressionmodelsduringmachiningofcompositematerials AT robertcep acomparativeanalysisonpredictionperformanceofregressionmodelsduringmachiningofcompositematerials AT shankarchakraborty acomparativeanalysisonpredictionperformanceofregressionmodelsduringmachiningofcompositematerials AT shibaprasadbhattacharya comparativeanalysisonpredictionperformanceofregressionmodelsduringmachiningofcompositematerials AT kanakkalita comparativeanalysisonpredictionperformanceofregressionmodelsduringmachiningofcompositematerials AT robertcep comparativeanalysisonpredictionperformanceofregressionmodelsduringmachiningofcompositematerials AT shankarchakraborty comparativeanalysisonpredictionperformanceofregressionmodelsduringmachiningofcompositematerials |