Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture

Abstract Background Distal ulna head or neck fracture is commonly associated with distal radius fracture. Treatment of these fractures remains controversial. Plate osteosynthesis is commonly performed. The purpose of this study was to observe clinical and radiological outcomes in ulna hook plate ost...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morgan Gauthier, Jean-Yves Beaulieu, Lucille Nichols, Didier Hannouche
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00658-3
_version_ 1828434655498469376
author Morgan Gauthier
Jean-Yves Beaulieu
Lucille Nichols
Didier Hannouche
author_facet Morgan Gauthier
Jean-Yves Beaulieu
Lucille Nichols
Didier Hannouche
author_sort Morgan Gauthier
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Distal ulna head or neck fracture is commonly associated with distal radius fracture. Treatment of these fractures remains controversial. Plate osteosynthesis is commonly performed. The purpose of this study was to observe clinical and radiological outcomes in ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for distal ulna fracture associated with distal radius fracture. Materials and methods This retrospective study between 2010 and 2018 included patients presenting combined displaced distal ulna fracture and distal radius fracture who were treated with ulna hook plate osteosynthesis. Patient evaluation included pain measurement with the visual analog scale, wrist range of motion, grip and pinch strengths, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and Mayo wrist score. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed to classify the distal ulna fracture according to Biyani. Bone union was evaluated on postoperative X-rays. At final follow-up, the usual radiographic parameters were measured and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) osteoarthritis was assessed. Results A total of 48 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years old and mean follow-up was 28 months. According to the Biyani classification, there were 12 type I, 4 type II, 8 type III, and 24 type IV distal ulna fractures. Wrist flexion was 60°, extension 57°, pronation 85°, and supination 80°. Grip strength was 21 kg (86% of the uninjured opposite side). Pinch strength was 6.6 kg (92% of the uninjured opposite side). Clinical scores were very good to excellent, with a mean Q-DASH of 12 and a Mayo wrist score of 90. Discomfort or pain due to the implant that required implant removal was reported in 29%, and was higher in younger patients. Nonunion was observed in two cases and secondary implant displacement in one case. These three cases required secondary intervention with ulna head resection, which was higher in Biyani type IV. DRUJ osteoarthritis was observed in 12 patients (31%) and was higher in older patients. Conclusions Ulna hook plate fixation gives good clinical results and a high rate of fracture union, but complications are common. Implant irritation is a frequent complication, especially in young patients, and often requires implant removal. Level of evidence: IV
first_indexed 2024-12-10T18:53:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32008868b6e54d2b87af37beca30ec80
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1590-9921
1590-9999
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T18:53:24Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
spelling doaj.art-32008868b6e54d2b87af37beca30ec802022-12-22T01:37:14ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology1590-99211590-99992022-08-012311710.1186/s10195-022-00658-3Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fractureMorgan Gauthier0Jean-Yves Beaulieu1Lucille Nichols2Didier Hannouche3Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospitals of GenevaDivision of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospitals of GenevaDivision of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospitals of GenevaDivision of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospitals of GenevaAbstract Background Distal ulna head or neck fracture is commonly associated with distal radius fracture. Treatment of these fractures remains controversial. Plate osteosynthesis is commonly performed. The purpose of this study was to observe clinical and radiological outcomes in ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for distal ulna fracture associated with distal radius fracture. Materials and methods This retrospective study between 2010 and 2018 included patients presenting combined displaced distal ulna fracture and distal radius fracture who were treated with ulna hook plate osteosynthesis. Patient evaluation included pain measurement with the visual analog scale, wrist range of motion, grip and pinch strengths, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and Mayo wrist score. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed to classify the distal ulna fracture according to Biyani. Bone union was evaluated on postoperative X-rays. At final follow-up, the usual radiographic parameters were measured and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) osteoarthritis was assessed. Results A total of 48 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years old and mean follow-up was 28 months. According to the Biyani classification, there were 12 type I, 4 type II, 8 type III, and 24 type IV distal ulna fractures. Wrist flexion was 60°, extension 57°, pronation 85°, and supination 80°. Grip strength was 21 kg (86% of the uninjured opposite side). Pinch strength was 6.6 kg (92% of the uninjured opposite side). Clinical scores were very good to excellent, with a mean Q-DASH of 12 and a Mayo wrist score of 90. Discomfort or pain due to the implant that required implant removal was reported in 29%, and was higher in younger patients. Nonunion was observed in two cases and secondary implant displacement in one case. These three cases required secondary intervention with ulna head resection, which was higher in Biyani type IV. DRUJ osteoarthritis was observed in 12 patients (31%) and was higher in older patients. Conclusions Ulna hook plate fixation gives good clinical results and a high rate of fracture union, but complications are common. Implant irritation is a frequent complication, especially in young patients, and often requires implant removal. Level of evidence: IVhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00658-3Distal ulna fracturePlate osteosynthesisUlna hook plate
spellingShingle Morgan Gauthier
Jean-Yves Beaulieu
Lucille Nichols
Didier Hannouche
Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Distal ulna fracture
Plate osteosynthesis
Ulna hook plate
title Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture
title_full Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture
title_fullStr Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture
title_full_unstemmed Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture
title_short Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture
title_sort ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture
topic Distal ulna fracture
Plate osteosynthesis
Ulna hook plate
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00658-3
work_keys_str_mv AT morgangauthier ulnahookplateosteosynthesisforulnaheadfractureassociatedwithdistalradiusfracture
AT jeanyvesbeaulieu ulnahookplateosteosynthesisforulnaheadfractureassociatedwithdistalradiusfracture
AT lucillenichols ulnahookplateosteosynthesisforulnaheadfractureassociatedwithdistalradiusfracture
AT didierhannouche ulnahookplateosteosynthesisforulnaheadfractureassociatedwithdistalradiusfracture