Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
Abstract Background Preoperatively evaluating the feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement is the key to avoiding iatrogenic vertebral artery injury. However, it has not been verified whether the conventional CT measurements of C2 pediculoisthmic component (PIC) are reliable and accurate, and...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03727-3 |
_version_ | 1797853640985149440 |
---|---|
author | YueLin Wu ZhaoQuan Liang JunHao Bao Ling Wen Li Zhang |
author_facet | YueLin Wu ZhaoQuan Liang JunHao Bao Ling Wen Li Zhang |
author_sort | YueLin Wu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Preoperatively evaluating the feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement is the key to avoiding iatrogenic vertebral artery injury. However, it has not been verified whether the conventional CT measurements of C2 pediculoisthmic component (PIC) are reliable and accurate, and the results may lack validity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the evaluative performance of conventional CT measurements and to create an accurate predictor of morphometrics of C2 PIC. Methods A total of 304 C2 PICs were measured in 152 consecutive patients who underwent CT examination of the cervical spine between April 2020 and December 2020. We obtained the morphometric parameters of C2 PIC by measuring minimum PIC diameter (MPD) in CT multiplanar reconstruction versus conventional measurements of transverse PIC width (TPW), oblique PIC width (OPW) and definition of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA). The outer diameter measured less than 4 mm in MPD was regarded as the standard of precluding safe C2 pedicle screw insertion. The evaluative performance of the conventional CT measurements was assessed, and the correlation between conventional CT measurements and measurements in CT multiplanar reconstruction was calculated. Results The parameters in OPW and MPD were measured significantly larger than those in TPW, and the preclusion of C2 pedicle screw placement evaluated from TPW and HRVA was significantly higher than that evaluated from OPW and MPD. The sensitivity of TPW was 93.09%, and the specificity was 79.31%. The sensitivity and specificity of OPW were 97.82% and 82.76%. The sensitivity of HRVA was 88.36%, and the specificity was 96.55%. Strong agreement with the highest correlation coefficient (0.879) and determination coefficient (0.7720) suggested that the outer diameter of OPW could be useful for the precise prediction of MPD. Conclusions CT MPR allows accurate measurement of the narrowest section of the C2 PIC. The outer diameter of OPW could be simply measured and be useful for precise prediction of MPD, which makes C2 pedicle screw placement more safely than the conventional measurement of TPW and HRVA. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-09T19:53:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-32160f0cb72341e3b754241c5105d5e7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1749-799X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-09T19:53:58Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research |
spelling | doaj.art-32160f0cb72341e3b754241c5105d5e72023-04-03T05:34:17ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2023-03-011811810.1186/s13018-023-03727-3Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methodsYueLin Wu0ZhaoQuan Liang1JunHao Bao2Ling Wen3Li Zhang4The Spine Department, Orthopaedic Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General HospitalThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityThe Spine Department, Orthopaedic Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General HospitalThe Spine Department, Orthopaedic Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General HospitalAbstract Background Preoperatively evaluating the feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement is the key to avoiding iatrogenic vertebral artery injury. However, it has not been verified whether the conventional CT measurements of C2 pediculoisthmic component (PIC) are reliable and accurate, and the results may lack validity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the evaluative performance of conventional CT measurements and to create an accurate predictor of morphometrics of C2 PIC. Methods A total of 304 C2 PICs were measured in 152 consecutive patients who underwent CT examination of the cervical spine between April 2020 and December 2020. We obtained the morphometric parameters of C2 PIC by measuring minimum PIC diameter (MPD) in CT multiplanar reconstruction versus conventional measurements of transverse PIC width (TPW), oblique PIC width (OPW) and definition of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA). The outer diameter measured less than 4 mm in MPD was regarded as the standard of precluding safe C2 pedicle screw insertion. The evaluative performance of the conventional CT measurements was assessed, and the correlation between conventional CT measurements and measurements in CT multiplanar reconstruction was calculated. Results The parameters in OPW and MPD were measured significantly larger than those in TPW, and the preclusion of C2 pedicle screw placement evaluated from TPW and HRVA was significantly higher than that evaluated from OPW and MPD. The sensitivity of TPW was 93.09%, and the specificity was 79.31%. The sensitivity and specificity of OPW were 97.82% and 82.76%. The sensitivity of HRVA was 88.36%, and the specificity was 96.55%. Strong agreement with the highest correlation coefficient (0.879) and determination coefficient (0.7720) suggested that the outer diameter of OPW could be useful for the precise prediction of MPD. Conclusions CT MPR allows accurate measurement of the narrowest section of the C2 PIC. The outer diameter of OPW could be simply measured and be useful for precise prediction of MPD, which makes C2 pedicle screw placement more safely than the conventional measurement of TPW and HRVA.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03727-3High-riding vertebral arteryMultiplanar reconstructionC2 pediculoisthmic componentC2 pedicle screwCervical spine |
spellingShingle | YueLin Wu ZhaoQuan Liang JunHao Bao Ling Wen Li Zhang Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research High-riding vertebral artery Multiplanar reconstruction C2 pediculoisthmic component C2 pedicle screw Cervical spine |
title | Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods |
title_full | Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods |
title_fullStr | Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods |
title_short | Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods |
title_sort | morphology analysis of the c2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe c2 pedicle screw placement comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods |
topic | High-riding vertebral artery Multiplanar reconstruction C2 pediculoisthmic component C2 pedicle screw Cervical spine |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03727-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuelinwu morphologyanalysisofthec2pediculoisthmiccomponentandfeasibilityofsafec2pediclescrewplacementcomparisonofmultiplanarreconstructionversustraditionalradiographicmethods AT zhaoquanliang morphologyanalysisofthec2pediculoisthmiccomponentandfeasibilityofsafec2pediclescrewplacementcomparisonofmultiplanarreconstructionversustraditionalradiographicmethods AT junhaobao morphologyanalysisofthec2pediculoisthmiccomponentandfeasibilityofsafec2pediclescrewplacementcomparisonofmultiplanarreconstructionversustraditionalradiographicmethods AT lingwen morphologyanalysisofthec2pediculoisthmiccomponentandfeasibilityofsafec2pediclescrewplacementcomparisonofmultiplanarreconstructionversustraditionalradiographicmethods AT lizhang morphologyanalysisofthec2pediculoisthmiccomponentandfeasibilityofsafec2pediclescrewplacementcomparisonofmultiplanarreconstructionversustraditionalradiographicmethods |