Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods

Abstract Background Preoperatively evaluating the feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement is the key to avoiding iatrogenic vertebral artery injury. However, it has not been verified whether the conventional CT measurements of C2 pediculoisthmic component (PIC) are reliable and accurate, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: YueLin Wu, ZhaoQuan Liang, JunHao Bao, Ling Wen, Li Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03727-3
_version_ 1797853640985149440
author YueLin Wu
ZhaoQuan Liang
JunHao Bao
Ling Wen
Li Zhang
author_facet YueLin Wu
ZhaoQuan Liang
JunHao Bao
Ling Wen
Li Zhang
author_sort YueLin Wu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Preoperatively evaluating the feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement is the key to avoiding iatrogenic vertebral artery injury. However, it has not been verified whether the conventional CT measurements of C2 pediculoisthmic component (PIC) are reliable and accurate, and the results may lack validity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the evaluative performance of conventional CT measurements and to create an accurate predictor of morphometrics of C2 PIC. Methods A total of 304 C2 PICs were measured in 152 consecutive patients who underwent CT examination of the cervical spine between April 2020 and December 2020. We obtained the morphometric parameters of C2 PIC by measuring minimum PIC diameter (MPD) in CT multiplanar reconstruction versus conventional measurements of transverse PIC width (TPW), oblique PIC width (OPW) and definition of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA). The outer diameter measured less than 4 mm in MPD was regarded as the standard of precluding safe C2 pedicle screw insertion. The evaluative performance of the conventional CT measurements was assessed, and the correlation between conventional CT measurements and measurements in CT multiplanar reconstruction was calculated. Results The parameters in OPW and MPD were measured significantly larger than those in TPW, and the preclusion of C2 pedicle screw placement evaluated from TPW and HRVA was significantly higher than that evaluated from OPW and MPD. The sensitivity of TPW was 93.09%, and the specificity was 79.31%. The sensitivity and specificity of OPW were 97.82% and 82.76%. The sensitivity of HRVA was 88.36%, and the specificity was 96.55%. Strong agreement with the highest correlation coefficient (0.879) and determination coefficient (0.7720) suggested that the outer diameter of OPW could be useful for the precise prediction of MPD. Conclusions CT MPR allows accurate measurement of the narrowest section of the C2 PIC. The outer diameter of OPW could be simply measured and be useful for precise prediction of MPD, which makes C2 pedicle screw placement more safely than the conventional measurement of TPW and HRVA.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T19:53:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32160f0cb72341e3b754241c5105d5e7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T19:53:58Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-32160f0cb72341e3b754241c5105d5e72023-04-03T05:34:17ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2023-03-011811810.1186/s13018-023-03727-3Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methodsYueLin Wu0ZhaoQuan Liang1JunHao Bao2Ling Wen3Li Zhang4The Spine Department, Orthopaedic Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General HospitalThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityThe Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical UniversityThe Spine Department, Orthopaedic Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General HospitalThe Spine Department, Orthopaedic Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General HospitalAbstract Background Preoperatively evaluating the feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement is the key to avoiding iatrogenic vertebral artery injury. However, it has not been verified whether the conventional CT measurements of C2 pediculoisthmic component (PIC) are reliable and accurate, and the results may lack validity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the evaluative performance of conventional CT measurements and to create an accurate predictor of morphometrics of C2 PIC. Methods A total of 304 C2 PICs were measured in 152 consecutive patients who underwent CT examination of the cervical spine between April 2020 and December 2020. We obtained the morphometric parameters of C2 PIC by measuring minimum PIC diameter (MPD) in CT multiplanar reconstruction versus conventional measurements of transverse PIC width (TPW), oblique PIC width (OPW) and definition of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA). The outer diameter measured less than 4 mm in MPD was regarded as the standard of precluding safe C2 pedicle screw insertion. The evaluative performance of the conventional CT measurements was assessed, and the correlation between conventional CT measurements and measurements in CT multiplanar reconstruction was calculated. Results The parameters in OPW and MPD were measured significantly larger than those in TPW, and the preclusion of C2 pedicle screw placement evaluated from TPW and HRVA was significantly higher than that evaluated from OPW and MPD. The sensitivity of TPW was 93.09%, and the specificity was 79.31%. The sensitivity and specificity of OPW were 97.82% and 82.76%. The sensitivity of HRVA was 88.36%, and the specificity was 96.55%. Strong agreement with the highest correlation coefficient (0.879) and determination coefficient (0.7720) suggested that the outer diameter of OPW could be useful for the precise prediction of MPD. Conclusions CT MPR allows accurate measurement of the narrowest section of the C2 PIC. The outer diameter of OPW could be simply measured and be useful for precise prediction of MPD, which makes C2 pedicle screw placement more safely than the conventional measurement of TPW and HRVA.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03727-3High-riding vertebral arteryMultiplanar reconstructionC2 pediculoisthmic componentC2 pedicle screwCervical spine
spellingShingle YueLin Wu
ZhaoQuan Liang
JunHao Bao
Ling Wen
Li Zhang
Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
High-riding vertebral artery
Multiplanar reconstruction
C2 pediculoisthmic component
C2 pedicle screw
Cervical spine
title Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
title_full Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
title_fullStr Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
title_full_unstemmed Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
title_short Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
title_sort morphology analysis of the c2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe c2 pedicle screw placement comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
topic High-riding vertebral artery
Multiplanar reconstruction
C2 pediculoisthmic component
C2 pedicle screw
Cervical spine
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03727-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yuelinwu morphologyanalysisofthec2pediculoisthmiccomponentandfeasibilityofsafec2pediclescrewplacementcomparisonofmultiplanarreconstructionversustraditionalradiographicmethods
AT zhaoquanliang morphologyanalysisofthec2pediculoisthmiccomponentandfeasibilityofsafec2pediclescrewplacementcomparisonofmultiplanarreconstructionversustraditionalradiographicmethods
AT junhaobao morphologyanalysisofthec2pediculoisthmiccomponentandfeasibilityofsafec2pediclescrewplacementcomparisonofmultiplanarreconstructionversustraditionalradiographicmethods
AT lingwen morphologyanalysisofthec2pediculoisthmiccomponentandfeasibilityofsafec2pediclescrewplacementcomparisonofmultiplanarreconstructionversustraditionalradiographicmethods
AT lizhang morphologyanalysisofthec2pediculoisthmiccomponentandfeasibilityofsafec2pediclescrewplacementcomparisonofmultiplanarreconstructionversustraditionalradiographicmethods