Skin Conductance Responses of Learner and Licensed Drivers During a Hazard Perception Task

Background: While advanced driver assistance technologies have the potential to increase safety, there is concern that driver inattention resulting from overreliance on these features may result in crashes. Driver monitoring technologies to assess a driver’s state may be one solution. The purpose of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Theresa J. Chirles, Johnathon P. Ehsani, Neale Kinnear, Karen E. Seymour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619104/full
_version_ 1818848544409255936
author Theresa J. Chirles
Johnathon P. Ehsani
Neale Kinnear
Karen E. Seymour
Karen E. Seymour
Karen E. Seymour
author_facet Theresa J. Chirles
Johnathon P. Ehsani
Neale Kinnear
Karen E. Seymour
Karen E. Seymour
Karen E. Seymour
author_sort Theresa J. Chirles
collection DOAJ
description Background: While advanced driver assistance technologies have the potential to increase safety, there is concern that driver inattention resulting from overreliance on these features may result in crashes. Driver monitoring technologies to assess a driver’s state may be one solution. The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend the research on physiological responses to common driving hazards and examine how these may differ based on driving experience.Methods: Learner and Licensed drivers viewed a Driving Hazard Perception Task while electrodermal activity (EDA) was measured. The task presented 30 Event (hazard develops) and 30 Non-Event (routine driving) videos. A skin conductance response (SCR) score was calculated for each participant based on the percentage of videos that elicited an SCR.Results: Analysis of the SCR score during Event videos revealed a medium effect (d = 0.61) of group differences, whereby Licensed drivers were more likely to have an SCR than Learner drivers. Interaction effects revealed Licensed drivers were more likely to have an SCR earlier in the Event videos compared to the end, and the Learner drivers were more likely to have an SCR earlier in the Non-Event videos compared to the end.Conclusion: Our results support the viability of using SCR during driving videos as a marker of hazard anticipation differing based on experience. The interaction effects may illustrate situational awareness in licensed drivers and deficiencies in sustained vigilance among learner drivers. The findings demand further examination if physiological measures are to be validated as a tool to inform driver potential performance in an increasingly automated driving environment.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T06:19:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-321674d64a454205b9702c99cef6c2cc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T06:19:02Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-321674d64a454205b9702c99cef6c2cc2022-12-21T20:32:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-03-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.619104619104Skin Conductance Responses of Learner and Licensed Drivers During a Hazard Perception TaskTheresa J. Chirles0Johnathon P. Ehsani1Neale Kinnear2Karen E. Seymour3Karen E. Seymour4Karen E. Seymour5Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Health Policy and Management Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United StatesCenter for Injury Research and Prevention, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Health Policy and Management Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United StatesTransportation Research Laboratory, Wokingham, United KingdomSchool of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United StatesBloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United StatesNational Institutes of Health, Center for Scientific Review, Bethesda, MD, United StatesBackground: While advanced driver assistance technologies have the potential to increase safety, there is concern that driver inattention resulting from overreliance on these features may result in crashes. Driver monitoring technologies to assess a driver’s state may be one solution. The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend the research on physiological responses to common driving hazards and examine how these may differ based on driving experience.Methods: Learner and Licensed drivers viewed a Driving Hazard Perception Task while electrodermal activity (EDA) was measured. The task presented 30 Event (hazard develops) and 30 Non-Event (routine driving) videos. A skin conductance response (SCR) score was calculated for each participant based on the percentage of videos that elicited an SCR.Results: Analysis of the SCR score during Event videos revealed a medium effect (d = 0.61) of group differences, whereby Licensed drivers were more likely to have an SCR than Learner drivers. Interaction effects revealed Licensed drivers were more likely to have an SCR earlier in the Event videos compared to the end, and the Learner drivers were more likely to have an SCR earlier in the Non-Event videos compared to the end.Conclusion: Our results support the viability of using SCR during driving videos as a marker of hazard anticipation differing based on experience. The interaction effects may illustrate situational awareness in licensed drivers and deficiencies in sustained vigilance among learner drivers. The findings demand further examination if physiological measures are to be validated as a tool to inform driver potential performance in an increasingly automated driving environment.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619104/fullelectrodermal activityautonomous vehiclesdriving experiencehazard perceptionyoung drivers
spellingShingle Theresa J. Chirles
Johnathon P. Ehsani
Neale Kinnear
Karen E. Seymour
Karen E. Seymour
Karen E. Seymour
Skin Conductance Responses of Learner and Licensed Drivers During a Hazard Perception Task
Frontiers in Psychology
electrodermal activity
autonomous vehicles
driving experience
hazard perception
young drivers
title Skin Conductance Responses of Learner and Licensed Drivers During a Hazard Perception Task
title_full Skin Conductance Responses of Learner and Licensed Drivers During a Hazard Perception Task
title_fullStr Skin Conductance Responses of Learner and Licensed Drivers During a Hazard Perception Task
title_full_unstemmed Skin Conductance Responses of Learner and Licensed Drivers During a Hazard Perception Task
title_short Skin Conductance Responses of Learner and Licensed Drivers During a Hazard Perception Task
title_sort skin conductance responses of learner and licensed drivers during a hazard perception task
topic electrodermal activity
autonomous vehicles
driving experience
hazard perception
young drivers
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619104/full
work_keys_str_mv AT theresajchirles skinconductanceresponsesoflearnerandlicenseddriversduringahazardperceptiontask
AT johnathonpehsani skinconductanceresponsesoflearnerandlicenseddriversduringahazardperceptiontask
AT nealekinnear skinconductanceresponsesoflearnerandlicenseddriversduringahazardperceptiontask
AT kareneseymour skinconductanceresponsesoflearnerandlicenseddriversduringahazardperceptiontask
AT kareneseymour skinconductanceresponsesoflearnerandlicenseddriversduringahazardperceptiontask
AT kareneseymour skinconductanceresponsesoflearnerandlicenseddriversduringahazardperceptiontask