Total intravenous anesthesia compared to traditional general anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy with interscalene block in the beach chair position

Background: Shoulder arthroscopy is commonly performed in the beach chair position, which has been linked to cerebral oxygen desaturation. Previous studies comparing general anesthesia (GA) to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol indicate that TIVA can preserve cerebral perfusion and a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lindsay Barrera, MD, Behnam Sharareh, MD, Poornima Tamma, BS, Anup Shah, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-07-01
Series:JSES International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638323001159
_version_ 1797796102854934528
author Lindsay Barrera, MD
Behnam Sharareh, MD
Poornima Tamma, BS
Anup Shah, MD
author_facet Lindsay Barrera, MD
Behnam Sharareh, MD
Poornima Tamma, BS
Anup Shah, MD
author_sort Lindsay Barrera, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Shoulder arthroscopy is commonly performed in the beach chair position, which has been linked to cerebral oxygen desaturation. Previous studies comparing general anesthesia (GA) to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol indicate that TIVA can preserve cerebral perfusion and autoregulation, as well as shorten recovery time and reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, few studies have evaluated the use of TIVA in shoulder arthroscopy. Thus, this study seeks to determine if TIVA is superior to traditional GA methods in terms of improving operating room efficiency, shortening recovery time, and reducing adverse events while theoretically preserving cerebral autoregulation in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position, comparing 2 anesthetic techniques. One hundred fifty patients were included (75 TIVA and 75 GA). Unpaired t-tests were used to determine statistical significance. Outcome measures included operating room times, recovery times, and adverse events. Results: Compared to GA, TIVA significantly improved phase 1 recovery time (53.2 ± 32.9 min compared to 65.8 ± 41.3 min; P = .037) and total recovery time (120.3 ± 31.0 min compared to 131.5 ± 36.8 min; P = .048). TIVA also decreased time from case finish to out-of-room (6.5 ± 3.5 min compared to 8.4 ± 6.3 min; P = .021). However, the in-room to case start time was slightly longer for the TIVA group (31.8 ± 7.22 min compared to 29.2 ± 4.92 min; P = .012). Although not statistically significant, there were fewer readmissions in the TIVA group compared to the GA group (P = .08), and TIVA had lower rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P = .22) and higher intraoperative mean arterial pressures (87.1 ± 11.4 mmHg in the TIVA group compared to 85.0 ± 9.3 mmHg in the GA group; P = .22). Conclusion: TIVA may be a safe and efficient alternative to GA in shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position. Larger scale studies are needed to evaluate the risk of adverse events related to impaired cerebral autoregulation in the beach chair position.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:28:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-322fea8bb5d84cde846709fc6ab47c62
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:28:07Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JSES International
spelling doaj.art-322fea8bb5d84cde846709fc6ab47c622023-06-25T04:44:01ZengElsevierJSES International2666-63832023-07-0174648652Total intravenous anesthesia compared to traditional general anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy with interscalene block in the beach chair positionLindsay Barrera, MD0Behnam Sharareh, MD1Poornima Tamma, BS2Anup Shah, MD3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Corresponding author: Lindsay Barrera, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge Street, Ste. 10A, Houston, TX 77030, USA.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USASchool of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USAUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix Banner University Medical Group, Phoenix, AZ, USABackground: Shoulder arthroscopy is commonly performed in the beach chair position, which has been linked to cerebral oxygen desaturation. Previous studies comparing general anesthesia (GA) to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol indicate that TIVA can preserve cerebral perfusion and autoregulation, as well as shorten recovery time and reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, few studies have evaluated the use of TIVA in shoulder arthroscopy. Thus, this study seeks to determine if TIVA is superior to traditional GA methods in terms of improving operating room efficiency, shortening recovery time, and reducing adverse events while theoretically preserving cerebral autoregulation in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position, comparing 2 anesthetic techniques. One hundred fifty patients were included (75 TIVA and 75 GA). Unpaired t-tests were used to determine statistical significance. Outcome measures included operating room times, recovery times, and adverse events. Results: Compared to GA, TIVA significantly improved phase 1 recovery time (53.2 ± 32.9 min compared to 65.8 ± 41.3 min; P = .037) and total recovery time (120.3 ± 31.0 min compared to 131.5 ± 36.8 min; P = .048). TIVA also decreased time from case finish to out-of-room (6.5 ± 3.5 min compared to 8.4 ± 6.3 min; P = .021). However, the in-room to case start time was slightly longer for the TIVA group (31.8 ± 7.22 min compared to 29.2 ± 4.92 min; P = .012). Although not statistically significant, there were fewer readmissions in the TIVA group compared to the GA group (P = .08), and TIVA had lower rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P = .22) and higher intraoperative mean arterial pressures (87.1 ± 11.4 mmHg in the TIVA group compared to 85.0 ± 9.3 mmHg in the GA group; P = .22). Conclusion: TIVA may be a safe and efficient alternative to GA in shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position. Larger scale studies are needed to evaluate the risk of adverse events related to impaired cerebral autoregulation in the beach chair position.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638323001159Total intravenous anesthesiaGeneral anesthesiaShoulder arthroscopyBeach chair position
spellingShingle Lindsay Barrera, MD
Behnam Sharareh, MD
Poornima Tamma, BS
Anup Shah, MD
Total intravenous anesthesia compared to traditional general anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy with interscalene block in the beach chair position
JSES International
Total intravenous anesthesia
General anesthesia
Shoulder arthroscopy
Beach chair position
title Total intravenous anesthesia compared to traditional general anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy with interscalene block in the beach chair position
title_full Total intravenous anesthesia compared to traditional general anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy with interscalene block in the beach chair position
title_fullStr Total intravenous anesthesia compared to traditional general anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy with interscalene block in the beach chair position
title_full_unstemmed Total intravenous anesthesia compared to traditional general anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy with interscalene block in the beach chair position
title_short Total intravenous anesthesia compared to traditional general anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy with interscalene block in the beach chair position
title_sort total intravenous anesthesia compared to traditional general anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopy with interscalene block in the beach chair position
topic Total intravenous anesthesia
General anesthesia
Shoulder arthroscopy
Beach chair position
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638323001159
work_keys_str_mv AT lindsaybarreramd totalintravenousanesthesiacomparedtotraditionalgeneralanesthesiainshoulderarthroscopywithinterscaleneblockinthebeachchairposition
AT behnamshararehmd totalintravenousanesthesiacomparedtotraditionalgeneralanesthesiainshoulderarthroscopywithinterscaleneblockinthebeachchairposition
AT poornimatammabs totalintravenousanesthesiacomparedtotraditionalgeneralanesthesiainshoulderarthroscopywithinterscaleneblockinthebeachchairposition
AT anupshahmd totalintravenousanesthesiacomparedtotraditionalgeneralanesthesiainshoulderarthroscopywithinterscaleneblockinthebeachchairposition