Abundance or stress? Faunal exploitation patterns and subsistence strategies: The case study of Brush Hut 1 at Ohalo II, a submerged 23,000-year-old camp in the Sea of Galilee, Israel

The submerged site of Ohalo II was occupied during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), between 23,500–22,500 cal BP, bridging the Upper Paleolithic/Epipaleolithic transition in the southern Levant. The site is known for the excellent preservation of its brush huts and botanical remains. This study exami...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tikvah Steiner, Rebecca Biton, Dani Nadel, Florent Rivals, Rivka Rabinovich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791512/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1818985850977910784
author Tikvah Steiner
Rebecca Biton
Dani Nadel
Florent Rivals
Rivka Rabinovich
author_facet Tikvah Steiner
Rebecca Biton
Dani Nadel
Florent Rivals
Rivka Rabinovich
author_sort Tikvah Steiner
collection DOAJ
description The submerged site of Ohalo II was occupied during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), between 23,500–22,500 cal BP, bridging the Upper Paleolithic/Epipaleolithic transition in the southern Levant. The site is known for the excellent preservation of its brush huts and botanical remains. This study examines the behavior of its past inhabitants through analysis of the entire faunal assemblage found on the three successive floors of Brush Hut 1. Furthermore, it provides an opportunity to test differing models of prey choice and assess whether the observed resource diversification is the result of resource depression (explained by Optimal Foraging Theory) or resource abundance (explained by Niche Construction Theory). We focused on a quantitative, qualitative and spatial investigation of the more than 20,000 faunal remains, combining traditional zooarchaeological methods with microwear analysis of teeth and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) of burnt bones. Identification of faunal remains to the most detailed level possible, combined with analysis of skeletal element frequencies allowed reconstruction of a profile of the desired prey, highlighting the importance of small, expedient prey compared to larger game (ungulates). FTIR was used to identify degrees of burning and to develop a key to identifying burnt bones from water-logged environments. Availability of multiple food sources within a rich habitat may have driven exploitation of those varied local resources, rather than targeting energetically-rich large prey. The choice of a littoral habitat that could be intensively exploited is an example of niche selection. Comparison with contemporaneous and later sites contributes to the ongoing discussion about Early Epipaleolithic prey choice, and the impact, if any, of the LGM in the Jordan Valley. Ohalo II is an example of diverse prey choice motivated by abundance rather than stress, at a 23,000-year-old fisher-hunter-gatherers camp.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T18:41:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-32435089c109482f95e3aaefd7e8c662
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T18:41:27Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-32435089c109482f95e3aaefd7e8c6622022-12-21T19:29:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01171Abundance or stress? Faunal exploitation patterns and subsistence strategies: The case study of Brush Hut 1 at Ohalo II, a submerged 23,000-year-old camp in the Sea of Galilee, IsraelTikvah SteinerRebecca BitonDani NadelFlorent RivalsRivka RabinovichThe submerged site of Ohalo II was occupied during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), between 23,500–22,500 cal BP, bridging the Upper Paleolithic/Epipaleolithic transition in the southern Levant. The site is known for the excellent preservation of its brush huts and botanical remains. This study examines the behavior of its past inhabitants through analysis of the entire faunal assemblage found on the three successive floors of Brush Hut 1. Furthermore, it provides an opportunity to test differing models of prey choice and assess whether the observed resource diversification is the result of resource depression (explained by Optimal Foraging Theory) or resource abundance (explained by Niche Construction Theory). We focused on a quantitative, qualitative and spatial investigation of the more than 20,000 faunal remains, combining traditional zooarchaeological methods with microwear analysis of teeth and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) of burnt bones. Identification of faunal remains to the most detailed level possible, combined with analysis of skeletal element frequencies allowed reconstruction of a profile of the desired prey, highlighting the importance of small, expedient prey compared to larger game (ungulates). FTIR was used to identify degrees of burning and to develop a key to identifying burnt bones from water-logged environments. Availability of multiple food sources within a rich habitat may have driven exploitation of those varied local resources, rather than targeting energetically-rich large prey. The choice of a littoral habitat that could be intensively exploited is an example of niche selection. Comparison with contemporaneous and later sites contributes to the ongoing discussion about Early Epipaleolithic prey choice, and the impact, if any, of the LGM in the Jordan Valley. Ohalo II is an example of diverse prey choice motivated by abundance rather than stress, at a 23,000-year-old fisher-hunter-gatherers camp.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791512/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Tikvah Steiner
Rebecca Biton
Dani Nadel
Florent Rivals
Rivka Rabinovich
Abundance or stress? Faunal exploitation patterns and subsistence strategies: The case study of Brush Hut 1 at Ohalo II, a submerged 23,000-year-old camp in the Sea of Galilee, Israel
PLoS ONE
title Abundance or stress? Faunal exploitation patterns and subsistence strategies: The case study of Brush Hut 1 at Ohalo II, a submerged 23,000-year-old camp in the Sea of Galilee, Israel
title_full Abundance or stress? Faunal exploitation patterns and subsistence strategies: The case study of Brush Hut 1 at Ohalo II, a submerged 23,000-year-old camp in the Sea of Galilee, Israel
title_fullStr Abundance or stress? Faunal exploitation patterns and subsistence strategies: The case study of Brush Hut 1 at Ohalo II, a submerged 23,000-year-old camp in the Sea of Galilee, Israel
title_full_unstemmed Abundance or stress? Faunal exploitation patterns and subsistence strategies: The case study of Brush Hut 1 at Ohalo II, a submerged 23,000-year-old camp in the Sea of Galilee, Israel
title_short Abundance or stress? Faunal exploitation patterns and subsistence strategies: The case study of Brush Hut 1 at Ohalo II, a submerged 23,000-year-old camp in the Sea of Galilee, Israel
title_sort abundance or stress faunal exploitation patterns and subsistence strategies the case study of brush hut 1 at ohalo ii a submerged 23 000 year old camp in the sea of galilee israel
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791512/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT tikvahsteiner abundanceorstressfaunalexploitationpatternsandsubsistencestrategiesthecasestudyofbrushhut1atohaloiiasubmerged23000yearoldcampintheseaofgalileeisrael
AT rebeccabiton abundanceorstressfaunalexploitationpatternsandsubsistencestrategiesthecasestudyofbrushhut1atohaloiiasubmerged23000yearoldcampintheseaofgalileeisrael
AT daninadel abundanceorstressfaunalexploitationpatternsandsubsistencestrategiesthecasestudyofbrushhut1atohaloiiasubmerged23000yearoldcampintheseaofgalileeisrael
AT florentrivals abundanceorstressfaunalexploitationpatternsandsubsistencestrategiesthecasestudyofbrushhut1atohaloiiasubmerged23000yearoldcampintheseaofgalileeisrael
AT rivkarabinovich abundanceorstressfaunalexploitationpatternsandsubsistencestrategiesthecasestudyofbrushhut1atohaloiiasubmerged23000yearoldcampintheseaofgalileeisrael